Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.
Chargement... Lost Language Of Cranes,The (original 1986; édition 2005)par David Leavitt (Auteur)
Information sur l'oeuvreLe langage perdu de grues par David Leavitt (1986)
1,001 BYMRBYD Concensus (419) » 9 plus First Novels (121) Best LGBT Fiction (123) Five star books (1,256) 1980s (167) The American Experience (151) Books Read in 2012 (387) Chargement...
Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre. Rose y Owen Benjamin llevan una vida tranquila y sin sobresaltos en el vertiginoso Nueva York de nuestros días. Para ambos, su matrimonio y su apartamento familiar en medio de la ciudad constituyen un remanso de paz, un refugio. Pero Rose, correctora de una editorial, oculta el anhelo de una pasión que ha estado ausente de su vida, y Owen, que en su juventud pareciera destinado a una vida más brillante, se ha recluido en un monótono aunque respetable trabajo en una escuela privada, y esconde también una obsesión inconfesable. Pero será su único hijo, Philip, quien hará estallar este apacible mundo de civilizados secretos, cuando decida airear públicamente su homosexualidad y enfrentar a sus padres con la realidad. The Lost Language of Cranes focuses on a very specific time and place in queer history, and as a result any given reader's mileage may vary. The story focuses on the Benjamin family, consisting of parents Owen and Rose and son Philip. Owen and Rose are in danger of losing their apartment, and Owen and Philip are both closeted gay men living in 1980s New York. I want to start by saying that I enjoyed the read overall, because I did indeed finish it. The story was interesting, and I appreciated the sheer amount of introspection we're given from all of the different perspectives. The very last scene is brilliantly written, and I think it is an image I'll be thinking about for days to come. I say all this first because I have some big gripes that I'll be going into now. There is an additional subplot about a Black lesbian named Jerene that, frankly, does not get enough time in the spotlight. There is so much more that Leavitt could have done with her and her story, but as it is, it just seems like it was thrown in as a way to have additional representation (and to explain the title of the book). It feels like there was a half-hearted attempt to tie Jerene's story in with Philip's, but it ultimately felt like she was playing the role of the main character's boy-trouble confidant, which, ew. Rose, Owen's wife and Philip's mother, becomes intolerable toward the last third or so of the book. It made me want to throw my book at the wall with how much I despised her. This is all fine, but Leavitt seems to be trying to gain her some sympathy points toward the very end, which - hell no. She's an awful, selfish person, and she doesn't deserve a redemption arc, as flimsy as this one is. Because this book was written in the 80s - the same time in which the book takes place - there are things that readers today may struggle with, internalized homophobia chief among them. I'm an advocate for reading with the time and place in mind, but others may not be able to do so. That's worth keeping in mind before checking this one out. All in all, it's clear that Leavitt is a good writer, and the use of scene and character is great; I'd be interested in reading Leavitt's other work. I just wish the women were treated a little differently than they are here. 1986 novel by author, David Leavitt, set in New York and addresses the son's decision to "come out" and tell his parents about his being Gay. The book deals with relationships with Philip's boyfriends and in that it is a bit of a romance. It deals with relationships of Philip with his mother, with his father. The title of book comes from a new article about a child who developed his language from watching cranes (construction) outside of his window. (a bit like Are You My Mother). I found the book to be hard to get pulled into. The first part was slow, the second part a bit better. I didn't feel it was well developed). I wanted to like this book because I really enjoyed his book,The Body of Jonah Boyd. In this book, set in the 90s, it does address the fear of AIDs and how this drove these young men into wanting to find permanent relationships where they could have safety. It also deals with the difficulties that older men had to deal with prior to the option of "coming out". aucune critique | ajouter une critique
Appartient à la série éditorialeRainbow pocketboeken (149) Fait l'objet d'une adaptation dans
Fiction.
Literature.
LGBTQIA+ (Fiction.)
HTML:Set in the 1980s against the backdrop of a swiftly gentrifying Manhattan, The Lost Language of Cranes tells the story of twenty-five-year-old Philip Benjamin, who realizes he must come out to his parents after falling in love for the first time with a man. Philip's parents are facing their own problems: pressure from developers and the loss of their longtime home. But the real threat to the family is Philip's father's own struggle with his suppressed homosexuality, realized only in Sunday afternoon visits to gay porn theaters. Philip's revelation to his parents leads his father to a point of crisis and provokes changes that forever alter the landscape of the family's lives. Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque |
Discussion en coursAucunCouvertures populaires
Google Books — Chargement... GenresClassification décimale de Melvil (CDD)813.54Literature English (North America) American fiction 20th Century 1945-1999Classification de la Bibliothèque du CongrèsÉvaluationMoyenne:
Est-ce vous ?Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing. |
Essentially this is a book about miserable people written in lifeless prose. As a contrast, I'm reading Howard Jacobson at the moment, who writes about miserable people with sparkling, witty prose and it makes all the difference.
I did wonder as I read it if this book has just aged badly, and that at the time of writing it could get away with its dead prose and maudlin world view because it had political currency. However, there are many positive reviews on here, so I guess it just didn't provide that specific thing that separates my taste from that of many others. ( )