Everything you've always wanted to know about NSA ... well no, probably not everything, but a LOT ... maybe not a WHOLE lot, but some pretty interesting and jaw-dropping stuff about the size and scope of the Agency and its mission. I read Bamford's THE PUZZLE PALACE so many years ago that I've forgotten what was in it. With BODY OF SECRETS the author obviously had better access to both data and people at NSA, especially to one-time NSA Director General Michael Hayden, who was responsible for opening the Agency doors a bit wider to the media and the public. Not a book to whiz through. Took me a couple weeks. I'm glad I finally read this book, which has been gathering dust on my shelf for several years. Highly recommended.

- Tim Bazzett, author of the memoir, BOOKLOVER ( )

This was a frustrating book to read at times! Body of Secrets is a strangely two-tone book: the first 60% or so is historical, covering the National Security Agency's involvement in conflicts past. The last 40%, on the other hand, mostly covers the current-day (~2001) agency.

This is partially a practical melding—Bamford wanted to update his picture of the agency due to the long time since he published The Puzzle Palace, the first significant look at the NSA published in 1982—but it means the book gets a lot less interesting after the first 350 pages or so.

Quite simply, reading about the internal politics of the agency is far less interesting than studying how they've flitted around in the margins of history, occasionally reaching in to make a big mark but mostly trawling for understanding. Bamford is pretty great at cultivating sources and deploying FOIA requests strategically, so a lot of these accounts are much fuller than I'd seen before: the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the near-sinking of the USS Liberty by Israel to cover up war-crimes, etc. Those historical accounts are fascinating, and would be almost five-stars on their own.

But then there comes the accounting for the present day organization. Bamford discovers an obsession with a mountain of factoids, telling us again and again how many acres of computers there are, how much wiring there is, how many miles of roads there are in Crypto City. Quite frankly, it's un-revelatory and boring as hell, and seems to be included simply because Bamford got present-day access from then-Director Hayden.

And as a larger issue, sometimes Bamford's writing is mostly workable, but sometimes falls flat. Could have used some more editing, and a few less metaphorical descriptions. Diagnosis: Thomas-Friedmanitis.

But if you skip over the boring shit, it's a great book if you want to learn more about the Cold War! ( )

Be prepared to keep track an incredible array of organization names; the NSA is the archtypical bureaucratic labyrinth. The author relates the history of the NSA from its origins in the 1930s up to 2001 (the book clearly was written and published before 9/11. Now there's a tale I'd like to hear!). Startling revelations: the US communications security during the Vietnam war was completely compromised and made, for example, the bombings by B52s ineffective. The Israeli attack on the NSA intercept ship Liberty during the Six Day War (1967) was no mistake, but was deliberate in order to hide the massacre of surrendered Egyptian solders by Israel Defense Forces. The US decided to suppress the evidence, since 1967 was an election year and LBJ didn't want to anger the Jewish community. Of course, the NSA is about cryptology and has had more impact on the development of computers than I had realized. Basically, the NSA's needs drive the rapid technological development we've witnessed over the past 30 years.

There is a competing need for defense and so the need for secrecy and the need for transparency for accountability. The author relates a number of abuses and outright illegalitys committed by NSA personnel and directors. NSA officials have often invoked the "trust us" mantra; the problem is that such trust is inevitably abused. So the pendulum of accountability swings back and forth. Who guards the guardians at the NSA? The history of the NSA suggests, "No one." ( )

An interesting book - not the tell-all it claims to be, but still quite interesting.

The author does tell a great deal about the NSA, but also about the CIA, and seems to spend a lot of time going off topic. The Liberty incident, which is covered in great detail in the book, relies a great deal on speculation - a bit too much?

Not a bad book - if only the author would stop relying on awful cliched metaphors. ( )

This is by far the best book thus far written about the secret world of the National Security Agency. Bramford gives readers an amazing peak behind closed doors and dives into everything about the infamous NSA, from its foundations to its modern operations. ( )