AccueilGroupesDiscussionsPlusTendances
Site de recherche
Ce site utilise des cookies pour fournir nos services, optimiser les performances, pour les analyses, et (si vous n'êtes pas connecté) pour les publicités. En utilisant Librarything, vous reconnaissez avoir lu et compris nos conditions générales d'utilisation et de services. Votre utilisation du site et de ses services vaut acceptation de ces conditions et termes.

Résultats trouvés sur Google Books

Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.

Chargement...

Good and Mad: The Revolutionary Power of Women's Anger (2018)

par Rebecca Traister

MembresCritiquesPopularitéÉvaluation moyenneMentions
6222637,583 (4.24)30
In the year 2018, it seems as if women's anger has suddenly erupted into the public conversation. But long before Pantsuit Nation, before the Women's March, and before the #MeToo movement, women's anger was not only politically catalytic but politically problematic. The story of female fury and its cultural significance demonstrates the long history of bitter resentment that has enshrouded women's slow rise to political power in America, as well as the ways that anger is received when it comes from women as opposed to when it comes from men. Rebecca Traister tracks the history of female anger as political fuel--from suffragettes chaining themselves to the White House to office workers vacating their buildings after Clarence Thomas was confirmed to the Supreme Court. Here Traister explores women's anger at both men and other women; anger between ideological allies and foes; the varied ways anger is perceived based on its owner; as well as the history of caricaturing and delegitimizing female anger; and the way women's collective fury has become transformative political fuel, as is most certainly occurring today. She deconstructs society's (and the media's) condemnation of female emotion (notably, rage) and the impact of their resulting repercussions. Highlighting a double standard perpetuated against women by all sexes, and its disastrous, stultifying effect, Traister offers a glimpse into the galvanizing force of women's collective anger, which, when harnessed, can change history.… (plus d'informations)
Chargement...

Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre

Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre.

» Voir aussi les 30 mentions

Affichage de 1-5 de 24 (suivant | tout afficher)
One of the best books I've ever read. Such a new, important, thorough account of history. ( )
  nogomu | Oct 19, 2023 |
This very well-written book takes a deep dive into the political potential of women's anger to affect change in the world. Traister also looks at the ways it already has. If you're good and mad, I recommend you read this book — then run for office. ( )
  beckyrenner | Aug 3, 2023 |
I’ve always considered myself to be a strong feminist, and I’m a political liberal. So Rebecca Traister’s “Good and Mad: The Revolutionary Power of Women’s Anger” should have been right in my wheelhouse. The truth is, I had a terrible time finishing it, and after several days of grinding through this disorganized, one-note (okay, two-note) howl, my husband asked me “What is that book about?” And I couldn’t answer him. Oh, I could – “Men are shits”. But there’s more than that, and less, in this 250-page screed arising largely from the upwelling of women’s anger at the 2016 elections, given a second wind by the 2017 revival of the #MeToo movement, and fueled by a whole lot of stuff about race-based and class-based schisms within the movement.

See what I mean?

Traister wants to talk about the women’s movement in America, going all the way back to First Lady Abigail Adams’ cautionary advice that “if particular care and attention is not paid to the ladies, we are determined to foment a rebellion, and will not hold ourselves bound by any laws in which we have no voice, or representation”, skimming over the Declaration of Rights and Sentiments of 1848 and the fight for women’s suffrage, but at the same time noting that women of color have often been excluded by the movement’s upper-class white leaders who are themselves the recipients of many of the rights and privileges granted them by their affiliation with the very white patriarchal power structure that the movement wants to dismantle.

(And incidentally, that 124-word single-sentence paragraph above is mine, but could have been dropped anywhere into Traister’s manuscript and been indistinguishable from her own prose.)

There’s just too much going on here. Too many “yes, but” moments. Too much roll-calling of powerful men who have been revealed as guilty of everything from thoughtless sexism right up to criminal rape. Too many diatribes by women within the movement calling out others for not being angry enough, supportive enough, politically active enough. And not enough, really, of what to do with your anger beyond “vote, run, and knock on doors for your candidate”.

I saw a review on Amazon.com that rated it “5 stars if you are mad; 1 star if you are tired of mad”. I guess if you’re tired of mad after reading this book but feel guilty about that, you’d have to split the difference. So … 2.5 stars. ( )
  LyndaInOregon | Jun 29, 2023 |
In anticipation of the 2020 election, this book remains an incredibly relevant overview of women's role in the political and public realm. If nothing else, it sets the stage for the Republican backlash that we've already seen towards Kamala Harris as the Vice Presidential nominee, along with important historical touchpoints about white women co-opting black female movements. Powerful and timely. ( )
  amsilverny | Feb 22, 2023 |
A deeply personal account of the aftermath of Hillary's loss to Trump and the metoo movement.

( )
  Bookjoy144 | Mar 2, 2022 |
Affichage de 1-5 de 24 (suivant | tout afficher)
aucune critique | ajouter une critique
Vous devez vous identifier pour modifier le Partage des connaissances.
Pour plus d'aide, voir la page Aide sur le Partage des connaissances [en anglais].
Titre canonique
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Titre original
Titres alternatifs
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Date de première publication
Personnes ou personnages
Lieux importants
Évènements importants
Films connexes
Épigraphe
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Do not put such unlimited power into the hands of the husbands. Remember, all men would be tyrants if they could. If particular care and attention is not paid to the ladies, we are determined to foment a rebellion, and will not hold ourselves bound by any laws in which we have no voice or representation.
—Abigail Adams
The Feminine
Is not
Dead
Nor is she
Sleeping

Angry, yes,
Seething, yes.

Biding her time;

Yes.
Yes.
—Alice Walker
Dédicace
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
For Bella and Rosie
Premiers mots
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
"Get your fucking hands off me, goddamn it!" bellowed Florynce Kennedy, enormous peace sign earrings flying, her head wrapped in a red turban.
Citations
Derniers mots
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
(Cliquez pour voir. Attention : peut vendre la mèche.)
Notice de désambigüisation
Directeur de publication
Courtes éloges de critiques
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Langue d'origine
DDC/MDS canonique
LCC canonique

Références à cette œuvre sur des ressources externes.

Wikipédia en anglais

Aucun

In the year 2018, it seems as if women's anger has suddenly erupted into the public conversation. But long before Pantsuit Nation, before the Women's March, and before the #MeToo movement, women's anger was not only politically catalytic but politically problematic. The story of female fury and its cultural significance demonstrates the long history of bitter resentment that has enshrouded women's slow rise to political power in America, as well as the ways that anger is received when it comes from women as opposed to when it comes from men. Rebecca Traister tracks the history of female anger as political fuel--from suffragettes chaining themselves to the White House to office workers vacating their buildings after Clarence Thomas was confirmed to the Supreme Court. Here Traister explores women's anger at both men and other women; anger between ideological allies and foes; the varied ways anger is perceived based on its owner; as well as the history of caricaturing and delegitimizing female anger; and the way women's collective fury has become transformative political fuel, as is most certainly occurring today. She deconstructs society's (and the media's) condemnation of female emotion (notably, rage) and the impact of their resulting repercussions. Highlighting a double standard perpetuated against women by all sexes, and its disastrous, stultifying effect, Traister offers a glimpse into the galvanizing force of women's collective anger, which, when harnessed, can change history.

Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque

Description du livre
Résumé sous forme de haïku

Discussion en cours

Aucun

Couvertures populaires

Vos raccourcis

Évaluation

Moyenne: (4.24)
0.5
1
1.5
2 6
2.5 1
3 12
3.5 1
4 39
4.5 4
5 52

Est-ce vous ?

Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing.

 

À propos | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Respect de la vie privée et règles d'utilisation | Aide/FAQ | Blog | Boutique | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliothèques historiques | Critiques en avant-première | Partage des connaissances | 204,231,503 livres! | Barre supérieure: Toujours visible