It has been argued long and hard that Plato's Apology is the true account of the trial of Socrates. As a witness to the trial he transcribes Socrates's speech in his own defense as he faces his accusers. The court affidavit states Socrates is a "doer of evil; does not believe in the gods of the State, but has other new divinities of his own." He is, through his own philosophies, corrupting the youth of Athens. Despite his eloquent and passionate speech Socrates is found guilty and sentenced to death by hemlock. Apology covers the trial, the verdict and the sentencing.

I find it interesting that while Plato does not reveal the number of votes that warranted a guilty verdict Socrates states, "but now, had thirty votes gone over to the other side, I should have been acquitted" (p 32). Found guilty by only 30 votes! Another interesting moment is when Socrates confronts one of his accusers, Meletus. Socrates gets him to contradict the affidavit by admitting he thinks Socrates is an atheist. How can Socrates be both an atheist and someone who worships personal deities? ( )

This little paperback is an excellent introduction to Plato. There are sentence summaries of the paragraphs and a very clear introduction to each dialogue by the editor. Finally after so many years I think I may really get a handle on Plato. ( )