The youngest man to ever hold the position of what is called today Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, came to power as result of the political turmoil following the loss in America and died in office facing off against the greatest general to stride across Europe. William Hague’s William Pitt the Younger is the definitive biography of one of the most important men to lead Britain.

Hague’s detailed recounting of the younger Pitt’s life and times gives the reader an understanding not only of the man but the political dynamics of late 18th-Century Britain. While Pitt’s quick rise to power and the extraordinary crisis he had to manage—the Regency debate, the various wars with Revolutionary and Napoleonic France, etc.—are handled in a well written narrative style of twists and turns, Hague’s analysis of Pitt as a person is where this biography goes from great to excellent. The most important personal issue addressed about the lifelong bachelor was his sexuality, it was something Hague did not handle flippantly but analyzed over some pages drawing on all facets of Pitt’s life to give his conclusion.

William Pitt the Younger gives a full account of the life of Britain’s youngest Prime Minister and the times he lived in that influenced his time in office. William Hague’s biographical and historical narratives are written lively keeping the reader’s attention throughout. ( )

An absolutely superb biography of William Pitt the Younger by William Hague, a man who at the age of twenty-two was Chancellor of the Exchequer and by the age of 24 was Prime Minister for 18 of the next 22 years until his death, caused by a combination of over-work and over-drinking. A tumultuous time in British history with the madness of King George III and the subsequent regency crisis, and the French Revolution leading to the Napoleanoic wars. Hague is always sympathetic to this cold, aloof, very talented character who's singled mindnesses we would probably think as autistic in modern times. A man who had no romantic ties but devoted his life to service to the country. A great read. ( )

A very thorough biography of a British statesman who left a mark on British politics. William Pitt the Younger followed in the footsteps of his father (William Pitt the Elder) and did so a young age, being only 21 when he became a Member of Parliament. Within a few short years he was the principle figure in the government, a position he would hold (with only a few brief exceptions) until his death in 1806. He formed a working relationship with King George III, pursued a number of reforms (some more successful than others), and was at the helm of navigating Britain through the early years of the Napoleonic Wars. This man lived an interesting and influence life and this biography does a good job telling the story of his life and placing it in the context it deserves. ( )

I read William Hague's biography of William Wilberforce which I found gripping, well researched and to constantly provoke me to self examination. By comparison this felt like much harder work and took a lot more getting into. However, it is again well researched and well written. It affords great insight into our political history and the early implementation of income tax and economics driven political leadership. Pitt the younger was an amazing man, just not as inspiring or rounded as Wilberforce. At no stage did I think, "I wish I was more like him." So for political history this is good, but for personal inspiration and a challenge to what a Christian faith lived out looks like, stick with Wilberforce. ( )

Hard to praise this too highly. Puts Hague up there with the great politician/ writers such as Jenkins, Churchill, Buchan. Full of fascinating detail about Cabinet wrangles, Parliamentary procedure, the Irish problem, King George's madness, the Prince of Wales's profligacy, complex diplomacy and more; a page-turner. And this despite his subject, Pitt, being a cold fish to say the least, a man of unfulfilled promise despite his record length of service. Pitt seems to have been a phenomenon of cool brain, determination and political skill with exceptional talents as a manager of the nation's finances (though not his own!). But he was a Spock-like blank, with no sex life, and few human feelings other than a fondness for the bottle. We are told of his mastery of the House of Commons, borne of early training by his father, but the speeches fail to come across on the page; no phrases reverberate; both speeches and letters seem verbose, plodding and artificial. Several of his contemporaries make much livelier copy (Burke, Sheridan, Fox, even Wellington).
Cometh the hour, cometh the man? There are parallels with Churchill. Pitt held his own against the overwhelming land victories of a dictator, when his colleagues and opponents might well have sold out (as they did briefly at the Peace of Amiens). Pitt was perhaps really a peacetime leader who found himself fighting one of the most desperate wars in history. He managed to hold the line, funding the Navy, protecting the pound, but was himself destroyed by the struggle. The last chapters of the book have the quality of tragedy. ( )