AccueilGroupesDiscussionsPlusTendances
Site de recherche
Ce site utilise des cookies pour fournir nos services, optimiser les performances, pour les analyses, et (si vous n'êtes pas connecté) pour les publicités. En utilisant Librarything, vous reconnaissez avoir lu et compris nos conditions générales d'utilisation et de services. Votre utilisation du site et de ses services vaut acceptation de ces conditions et termes.

Résultats trouvés sur Google Books

Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.

Chargement...

Purple Secret (1998)

par John C.G. Rohl, David Hunt, Martin Warren

MembresCritiquesPopularitéÉvaluation moyenneMentions
751354,854 (3.88)6
First published in 1998, this is a study, based on DNA sequencing, that traces the porphyria stain through the genealogical maze of Europe's royal dynasties to the present day descendants of the Houses of Hanover and Windsor, and the consequences it might have had on the history of Europe and North America.… (plus d'informations)
Aucun
Chargement...

Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre

Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre.

» Voir aussi les 6 mentions

An account of the likely incidence of porphyria in European royal families. The authors are a historian (John C.G. Röhl) and two geneticists (Martin Warren and David Hunt); perhaps the book could have benefited from fewer authors but more editors. The issue of porphyria in royalty first came up with a 1966 paper in the British Medical Journal by Ida Macalpine and her son Richard Hunter, theorizing that the notorious “madness” of King George III that precipitated the Regency Crisis was porphyria. The theory has now so permeated historical consciousness that I never realized it was (and to a certain extent, still is) controversial; but at the time it most definitely was. The prevailing theory in 1966 was Freudian; George III was suffering from “sexual frustration” resulting in his rejection of Queen Charlotte and sexual attacks on Lady Pembroke (he couldn’t have been that frustrated, as he had 15 children with the Queen). The critics noted neither Macalpine or Hunter were experts on porphyria (they were both psychiatrists) and they weren’t proper Britishers (Macalpine had changed her name from Hirschmann in gratitude for refuge after her escape from Nazi Germany; the authors of Purple Secret mention her Jewishness several times, perhaps hinting that her critics were anti-Semitic). Critics also claimed George III’s reported symptoms were vague enough to be consistent with an assortment of diseases in addition to porphyria, and that if it was genetic porphyria half of his children should have had it as well.


Macalpine, Hunter and collaborator Claude Rimington attempted to answer the objections by tracking down the descendants of George III and asking them for stool and urine samples; they seemed genuinely surprised at the vehement negative responses they received. It was before the days of DNA analyses, and the genetics of porphyria hadn’t been worked out, so samples from an active case were the only way to make a positive diagnosis. The best they could do was claim that at least two people, disguised as “Patient A” and “Patient B”, had clinical signs of porphyria and were descendants of George III.


Unfortunately, the book bogs down at this point. Perhaps historian Röhl took over the writing; but what follows is page after page after page of medical records from various famous (Queen Victoria) and obscure (Princess Feodora) European royalty. While there’s an amazing amount of research involved – pages of doctor’s notes – it really doesn’t say very much. The problem is that the symptoms of porphyria are so varied that practically any complaint can be associated with it (headache, abdominal pains, constipation, “fragile” skin, light sensitivity, mental disorder, delirium, and neurological complaints). Even the sign generally considered definitive – red to purple urine – only occurs in active cases and can be caused by other illnesses – or even by eating beets. If anything, you could make the case that a lot of royalty suffered from overdoctoring and polypharmia – patients were dosed with laxatives, emetics, opiates, arsenic, antimony, brandy; prescribed diets (one princess was instructed to eat nothing but asparagus and mashed potatoes) and subjected to the dubious procedures popular at the time (bleeding, cupping, leeches and electric shocks) – often simultaneously. While some of the original complaints could well be porphyria, once the doctors got ahold of things it’s impossible to distinguish porphyria from reactions to the treatments. What the authors should have done first is provide a detailed explanation of porphyria rather than diving into the symptoms of dozens of European royals; I suspect the editors vetoed that as “too technical” and, unfortunately, it’s relegated to an appendix. Porphyria is caused by metabolic errors in the production of haem (which was originally called porphyrin, hence the name). However, the disease isn’t caused by haem deficiency, but by accumulation of byproducts from incorrect haem synthesis. Haem production is a seven-step process and can go wrong on any step; explaining the wide variety of “porphyria” symptoms and signs; each is caused by accumulation of different metabolites. The full sequence wasn’t worked out until 1995, long after the 1965 BMJ paper. (This might explain some of the criticisms of Macalpine and Hunter; many of the world’s porphyria cases occur in South Africa, where they can be traced back to the 1688 marriage of Gerrit Jansz to Ariaantje Jacobs. The South Africa doctors dismissed Macalpine and Hunter’s claim because George III’s symptoms were mostly different from those seen in South Africa. However, when it was shown that “porphyria” is a suite of conditions caused by different metabolic errors, one of the most prominent South African critics reversed his position and allowed that George III could have had one of the porphyria variants).


More or less definitive results do finally come, but are almost anticlimactic. Warren and Hunt obtain permission to sample the blood-stained shirt of Charles I and to exhume the bodies of two of Queen Victoria’s descendants – her granddaughter Princess Charlotte of Prussia and her great-granddaughter Princess Feodora. Unfortunately only one of these was a hit – Charles I’s shirt had been handled so many times that the evidence was equivocal and Princess Feodora’s grave in Poland had been robbed on several occasions and the scattered bones remaining didn’t seem to be hers. However, Princess Charlotte’s rest had been undisturbed until Warren and Hunt got to her; there was a water-damage hole in the coffin, they were able to get a fiber optics probe inside, and remotely grappled and extracted the Princess’s femur and a couple of finger bones. Amplification by PCR showed Princess Charlotte had a mutation that affected the gene that codes for protoporphyrinogen oxidase (which controls the transition from step 5 to step 6 in haem production). The princess’s medical records did show some porphyria symptoms; interestingly, one she shared with George III was a sort of sexual dementia; George III was notorious for making improper advances to Lady Pembroke during his mental episodes and Charlotte was notorious for doing the same with just about anybody.


Thus, despite a lot of interesting anecdotes about royal medical problems Purple Secret only slightly strengthens the case for porphyria in George III (George III was Princess Charlotte’s great-grand uncle). The definitive answer, of course, would involve getting DNA samples from some of the living royals and/or some of the other royal burials; the British royal family has never allowed anything of the sort (even, for example, to solve the “Princes in the Tower” mystery) and the authors of Purple Secret don’t even suggest it. ( )
1 voter setnahkt | Dec 16, 2017 |
aucune critique | ajouter une critique

» Ajouter d'autres auteur(e)s

Nom de l'auteurRôleType d'auteurŒuvre ?Statut
John C.G. Rohlauteur principaltoutes les éditionscalculé
Hunt, Davidauteur principaltoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Warren, Martinauteur principaltoutes les éditionsconfirmé
Vous devez vous identifier pour modifier le Partage des connaissances.
Pour plus d'aide, voir la page Aide sur le Partage des connaissances [en anglais].
Titre canonique
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Titre original
Titres alternatifs
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Date de première publication
Personnes ou personnages
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Lieux importants
Évènements importants
Films connexes
Épigraphe
Dédicace
Premiers mots
Citations
Derniers mots
Notice de désambigüisation
Directeur de publication
Courtes éloges de critiques
Langue d'origine
DDC/MDS canonique
LCC canonique

Références à cette œuvre sur des ressources externes.

Wikipédia en anglais (3)

First published in 1998, this is a study, based on DNA sequencing, that traces the porphyria stain through the genealogical maze of Europe's royal dynasties to the present day descendants of the Houses of Hanover and Windsor, and the consequences it might have had on the history of Europe and North America.

Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque

Description du livre
Résumé sous forme de haïku

Discussion en cours

Aucun

Couvertures populaires

Vos raccourcis

Évaluation

Moyenne: (3.88)
0.5
1
1.5
2 1
2.5
3 1
3.5 1
4 2
4.5 1
5 2

Est-ce vous ?

Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing.

 

À propos | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Respect de la vie privée et règles d'utilisation | Aide/FAQ | Blog | Boutique | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliothèques historiques | Critiques en avant-première | Partage des connaissances | 204,233,050 livres! | Barre supérieure: Toujours visible