Ce site utilise des cookies pour fournir nos services, optimiser les performances, pour les analyses, et (si vous n'êtes pas connecté) pour les publicités. En utilisant Librarything, vous reconnaissez avoir lu et compris nos conditions générales d'utilisation et de services. Votre utilisation du site et de ses services vaut acceptation de ces conditions et termes.
Résultats trouvés sur Google Books
Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.
This anthology provides comprehensive coverage of the major contributions of analytic philosophy to aesthetics and the philosophy of art, from the earliest beginnings in the 1950's to the present time. Traces the contributions of the analytic tradition to aesthetics and the philosophy of art, from the 1950's to the present time. Designed as a comprehensive guide to the field, it presents the most often-cited papers that students and researchers encounter. Addresses a wide range of topics, including identifying art, ontology, intention and interpretation, values of art, aesthetic properties, fictionality, and the aesthetics of nature. Explores particular art forms, including pictorial art, literature, music, and the popular arts.… (plus d'informations)
I can't really see people reading this other than undergraduates becuase they've been told to. But maybe I'm wrong. From what I know of the subject area, I'd gamble that it's fairly comprehensive and includes the really important papers, which is what you'd expect from an anthology of this sort. Note that this is analytic philosophy and thus quite difficult from the point of view of the uninitiated. One would probably be better off with something else is they're after a very general guide to aesthetics.
Lamarque was one of my tutors at university. He's very well established name in analytic aesthetics and has a number of his own 'lines' in this area, as he used to say. I also remember him being intrigued by the fishing hat I once wore to a tutuorial. ( )
Gods. Okay. I try not to use any of the Seven Dirty Words You Must Not Say Under Any Circumstances in my review -- after all, there could be CHILDREN READING THIS -- but seriously. Fuck aesthetics. Having to read this was probably the most disillusioning assignment I had in college. It's astonishing that people write so much about something so meaningless and empty.
It gets a star and a half because I guess it's an okay collection. But seriously, ugh. ( )
Références à cette œuvre sur des ressources externes.
Wikipédia en anglais
Aucun
▾Descriptions de livres
This anthology provides comprehensive coverage of the major contributions of analytic philosophy to aesthetics and the philosophy of art, from the earliest beginnings in the 1950's to the present time. Traces the contributions of the analytic tradition to aesthetics and the philosophy of art, from the 1950's to the present time. Designed as a comprehensive guide to the field, it presents the most often-cited papers that students and researchers encounter. Addresses a wide range of topics, including identifying art, ontology, intention and interpretation, values of art, aesthetic properties, fictionality, and the aesthetics of nature. Explores particular art forms, including pictorial art, literature, music, and the popular arts.
▾Descriptions provenant de bibliothèques
Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque
▾Description selon les utilisateurs de LibraryThing
Lamarque was one of my tutors at university. He's very well established name in analytic aesthetics and has a number of his own 'lines' in this area, as he used to say. I also remember him being intrigued by the fishing hat I once wore to a tutuorial. ( )