AccueilGroupesDiscussionsPlusTendances
Site de recherche
Ce site utilise des cookies pour fournir nos services, optimiser les performances, pour les analyses, et (si vous n'êtes pas connecté) pour les publicités. En utilisant Librarything, vous reconnaissez avoir lu et compris nos conditions générales d'utilisation et de services. Votre utilisation du site et de ses services vaut acceptation de ces conditions et termes
Hide this

Résultats trouvés sur Google Books

Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.

The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are…
Chargement...

The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion (original 2012; édition 2013)

par Jonathan Haidt (Auteur)

MembresCritiquesPopularitéÉvaluation moyenneMentions
2,109555,555 (4.06)75
A groundbreaking investigation into the origins of morality, which turns out to be the basis for religion and politics. The book explains the American culture wars and refutes the "New Atheists."
Membre:GPotter100
Titre:The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion
Auteurs:Jonathan Haidt (Auteur)
Info:Vintage (2013), Edition: Illustrated, 528 pages
Collections:Kindle - Owned, Votre bibliothèque
Évaluation:
Mots-clés:Aucun

Détails de l'œuvre

The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion par Jonathan Haidt (2012)

Chargement...

Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre

Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre.

» Voir aussi les 75 mentions

Affichage de 1-5 de 55 (suivant | tout afficher)
Get to know the other side

This book has been a fantastic way to learn how to not only understand the other side but speak the same language. A world tour on moral psychology, Haidt makes it accessible. ( )
  SeekingApatheia | Apr 13, 2021 |
I believe Jonathan Haidt has done something here that is truly remarkable. In the pursuit of wisdom, he has been able to suspend judgment long enough not only to listen empathetically but to learn from those he disagrees with. With the constant reinforcement of polarization in the media, this is becoming more and more and lost art. In the process, he offers a framework for understanding our religious and political divisions that has already helped me listen better and empathize more with others. You likely will disagree with him on certain points, but few other places will you find someone who listens and empathizes like he has.

This will be a book I read again soon and will probably purchase.

Ps. I was hesitant to read it since I had heard the 6 moral foundations framework before from others and in his TED talk (which is worth a look). However, The Righteous Mind is really three shorter books and the moral foundations part is just the middle third. In other words, there's much more here than I had heard in the summaries. I hope to give a fuller review after my second reading... ( )
  nrt43 | Dec 29, 2020 |
Listened to the first two hours. Lots of pop-sci references, with a heavy focus on self-promotion of studies that the author himself published. Parts of the beginning that discussed morality more from a philosophical point of view were at times enjoyable.

Haidt ends the second chapter with the promise that he would focus more on logic/reason rather than emotion/intuition. Then, the very next chapter starts with him describing a study utilizing hypnosis that had some "interesting results." Honestly, the juxtaposition of those two was so incongruous that at first I thought it might have been provided as an example of poor science. But I was wrong, and Haidt goes on to use the study to further a thesis.

Not recommended. ( )
  rsanek | Dec 26, 2020 |
I'm familiar with Haidts vocal call for more political diversity in social science and listened to some of his talks, which is why I really wanted to read this book for a long time. In the end I wasn't disappointed. Haidt makes a good case for his moral foundations model and made me update on the evolutionary genesis (and usefulness) of religion as he heavily criticises the theories of Dawkins on this topic. Furthermore I was able to gain a better understanding of the discourse on group selection and why everybody hates it, though Haidt prepares a really good defense. Overall I feel much more informed on the nature of human morals and its shaping through the process of evolution than before. Just two minor criticisms: Haidt manages to almost completely evade the topic of kin selection, which is quite sad as I was really curious how he would analyse its importance for our morality. Furthermore I really missed something on differential moral developments based on gene-culture-coevolution for different cultures, but I understand that something like this would have been suicidal to his reputation, career and the general reception of his book. Therefore: Still 5 stars. ( )
  aeqk | Dec 13, 2020 |
Eye opening, very insightful and well worth the read. It will help me talk to people with different political views in a way that hopefully opens doors. ( )
  GretchenCollins | Dec 10, 2020 |
Affichage de 1-5 de 55 (suivant | tout afficher)
aucune critique | ajouter une critique
Vous devez vous identifier pour modifier le Partage des connaissances.
Pour plus d'aide, voir la page Aide sur le Partage des connaissances [en anglais].
Titre canonique
Titre original
Titres alternatifs
Date de première publication
Personnes ou personnages
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Lieux importants
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Évènements importants
Films connexes
Prix et distinctions
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances russe. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Épigraphe
Dédicace
Premiers mots
Citations
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
I could not understand how any thinking person would voluntarily embrace the party of evil, and so I and my fellow liberals looked for psychological explanations for conservatism, but not for liberalism.
In psychology, theories are cheap.
Libertarians are basically liberals who love markets and lack bleeding hearts.
When libertarians talk about the miracle of "spontaneous order" that emerges when people are allowed to make their own choices, the rest of us should listen.
Emphasizing differences makes many people more racist, not less.
Derniers mots
Notice de désambigüisation
Directeur(-trice)(s) de publication
Courtes éloges de critiques
Informations provenant du Partage des connaissances anglais. Modifiez pour passer à votre langue.
Langue d'origine
DDC/MDS canonique
A groundbreaking investigation into the origins of morality, which turns out to be the basis for religion and politics. The book explains the American culture wars and refutes the "New Atheists."

Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque

Description du livre
Résumé sous forme de haïku

Vos raccourcis

Couvertures populaires

Évaluation

Moyenne: (4.06)
0.5
1 2
1.5
2 18
2.5 3
3 39
3.5 10
4 130
4.5 22
5 99

Est-ce vous ?

Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing.

 

À propos | Contact | LibraryThing.com | Respect de la vie privée et règles d'utilisation | Aide/FAQ | Blog | Boutique | APIs | TinyCat | Bibliothèques historiques | Critiques en avant-première | Partage des connaissances | 157,708,644 livres! | Barre supérieure: Toujours visible