Ce sujet est actuellement indiqué comme "en sommeil"—le dernier message date de plus de 90 jours. Vous pouvez le réveiller en postant une réponse.
1JNSelko
Do you shelve these by order of publication or by author?
Do you feel that you have to have both colophoned and non-colophoned editions of books that that distinction would pertain to?
Do you feel that you have to have both colophoned and non-colophoned editions of books that that distinction would pertain to?
2paradoxosalpha
Mine are mostly boxed right now. :(
I prefer to shelve by author.
I prefer to shelve by author.
3elenchus
I don't have enough of the BAF editions to really be tempted to shelve them together, though even if that were true, I suspect I'd stick with my general approach of shelving by author.
Like >2 paradoxosalpha:, mine are boxed at present anyway. (sigh)
Like >2 paradoxosalpha:, mine are boxed at present anyway. (sigh)
4anglemark
I might shelve these together at some time, but for now, they are dispersed, shelved by author among the rest of our books.
5Crypto-Willobie
I have them shelved in one area, vaguely by author. I also have some non-BAFs by the same authors shelved among them when it seems appropriate.
I don't worry about colophon or not. A few of mine are Canadian or UK BAFs -- I think all of these are James Branch Cabell titles.
I don't worry about colophon or not. A few of mine are Canadian or UK BAFs -- I think all of these are James Branch Cabell titles.
7bookstopshere
by author all together on a small shelf(OK shelves) . . . next door to the same authors (and books) in cloth edns where possible - and including most of the "would have been" volumes
I'd love to see this group more active
I'd love to see this group more active
8Glacierman
Integrated into the SF/Fantasy section of our library. This section is separated into hardcovers and paperbacks. So, of course, they go into the pb section, alphabetical by author, then title.