Bridgey's 2015 reading

Ah well, another year begins. This will be my fifth year on Librarything. I joined the Club Read last year and found it far better alternative to the 'set number' or 'set theme' groups.

My previous years reads can be found here:

These are here:

http://www.librarything.com/topic/107657 (2011)
http://www.librarything.com/topic/129358 (2012)
http://www.librarything.com/topic/148974 (2013)
http://www.librarything.com/topic/162991 (2014)

As before I will keep a running book total at the top and add review posts as and when I find the time.

I tend to read most genres but having just discovered Clive Cussler I think his books will be taking up a few spaces this year.

So if you fancy a chat or want to recommend any reads, drop by and leave a message.

All the best

Lee

1 - The Killer Inside Me - Jim Thompson ***
2 - Joyland - Stephen King *****
3 - Rain on the Dead - Jack Higgins ***
4 - A Town Like Alice - Nevil Shute *****
5 - The War of the Worlds - H. G. Wells ***
6 - Mr Mercedes - Stephen King *****
7 - Allhallows's eve - Richard Laymon ***
8 - Exocet - Jack Higgins ****
9 - Recalled to Life - Robert Silverberg ****
10 - Last Sword of Power - David Gemmell ****
11 - Taken at the Flood - Agatha Christie ***
12 - The Mediterranean Caper - Clive Cusler ****
13 - The Darling Buds of May - H E Bates ***
14 - Death From a Top Hat - Clayton Rawson ****
15 - Knights of Dark Renown - David Gemmell ****
16 - Harvest - Jim Crace ****
17 - The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin - David Nobbs ****
18 - Of Mice and Men - John Steinbeck *****
19 - The Big Sleep - Raymond Chandler *****
20 - Night of the Fox - Jack Higgins ****
21 - North Star - Hammond Innes *****
22 - The Buried Giant - Kazuo Ishiguro ***
23 - Rasputin: A Short Life - Frances Welch ****
24 - Figures in a Landscape - Barry England *****
25 - Gone to Texas - Forrest Carter ****
26 - Journey to Hell - Donald Macneil ****
27 - Three Men in a Boat - Jerome K Jerome **
28 - No Man's Land - Barry England ***
29 - The Return of Reginald Perrin - David Nobbs *****
30 - Iceberg - Clive Cussler ****
31 - King Rat - James Clavell *****
32 - Ian Fleming and James Bond - Ben Macintyre ****
33 - The Spy Who Came in from the Cold - John Le Carre ****

The Killer Inside - Jim Thompson ***

I had never heard of Jim Thompson, but browsing in a bookshop came across this. Stephen King recommended the author on the cover so I decided to pick it up and give it a try. I was surprised that it was written so long ago (1952) but I am quite a fan of the Noir period. James M Cain has to be one of most recently discovered favourite authors.

What is it about?

The book is told through the eyes of a small town deputy by the name of Lou Ford, a man who has created a fake persona as a slightly slow but lovable member of the community. We experience his paranoia and disturbed view of the world that leads him into a killing spree. Fuelled by past events from his childhood Ford meticulously plans each murder, but how long will it be before he is found out?

What did I like?

The action when it comes is very vivid, Thompson leaves very little to the imagination as we are described blow by blow the injuries inflicted on Ford's victims. I enjoyed the way that we are only allowed to experience Ford's own thoughts, this left me second guessing along with him whether or not the other characters were believing his stories or not. It was interesting to see how he perceived each situation and as his mental disease became more apparent to the reader, I also found myself looking at past events in a new light.

What didn't I like?

I understand the whole noir genre, and the need to keep language short and direct, but for me the novel was just a little too extreme. At times I lost myself in the plot and wasn't entirely sure what was happening. I admit, maybe this was just as much down to me as the author, but for me it spoilt the flow of the novel. Also I wish the author had explored Lou's early life a little more especially as the events directly related to his present day frame of mind. I love the character of Lou, but can't but help wonder what more have become if Cormac McCarthy had got his hands on him. Reminds me more than little of Child of God.

Anyway, by no means a poor read, just didn't hit enough buttons for me to be able to give it more than 3 stars. Looking at Amazon it has more than it's fair share of 5 star reviews so I am willing to accept that the fault is likely to be with me. I don't think I will actively seek out any more of Thompson's works, but if one 'fell' into my lap I would possibly give it a try.

Joyland - Stephen King *****

King has always been one of my favourite authors, renowned for his horror writing it always surprises me at how good an author he is when taken away from his usual genre. True Joyland does have more than a little supernatural element enclosed within its plot, but it is primarily a tale of a boy becoming a man, that happens to include a murder mystery. The book is sold as 'Hard Case Crime' and I have not read any of the other titles so I am unsure as to how well it fit's into the genre.

What is it about?

It follows Devin Jones a student who takes a summer job at an amusement park called Joyland, here he makes friends with Tom and Erin Although they all fit in well, Devin seems to take to it the easiest, leading some long term workers to claim that he must have some 'Carny' in him. However, there is a dark history lurking there. A number of years prior to that summer a girl named Linda Grey was brutally murdered in the haunted house and the killer is still at large. In a nod to King's earlier work 'The Shining' there are certain characters here with a psychic ability to tell the future and sense the dead. The first Devin encounters is the fortune teller who gives him a reading offering both a glimpse of his future and a warning. Intrigued by the murder Devin begins to investigate the events surrounding the event.

Along the way (as foretold by the fortune teller) he encounters a woman and a crippled son that watch him walk to work daily. A friendship with the boy begins against the mothers wishes, and his own personal problems soon become an integral part of the choices Devin is forced to make. All this, coupled with a broken heart, leads Devin on a personal journey of discovery.

What did I like?

Everything. Aside from the Dark Tower books this has to be the best King book I have read. It follows in the tradition of Hearts in Atlantis, The Body, and The Green Mile in allowing the reader to really care about what happens next. I have read other reviews that describe this a coming of age novel, but I really have to say that there is so much more to it than that. King has expertly blended the real life problems encountered by a boy growing up with a mystery even Agatha Christie would be proud of. I am far from an emotional person, but even I couldn't help but be drawn into the storyline, and while I can't say I was a gibbering wreck at the end of the novel I certainly felt myself filling up. That is a first for me. I don't want to go into the story any more than I have as it unfolds so beautifully that any more information would spoil the enjoyment. The ending was just so wonderfully written it will stay with me for a long time to come.

What didn't I like?

If I had to be very critical, the only thing that I could say was the 'carny' language (alternative words used by fairground workers) was used a little too much, but not so much that it detracted from the storyline.

Would I recommend it?

In a heartbeat. Some people are turned off King because they have read his horror stories and felt let down by either the plot development or the mediocre endings (Under the Dome anyone?). I think Joyland would be an ideal place both as an introduction to the author or those willing to revisit and give a second chance, of course King's constant readers will need no persuading to get stuck into the book.

Hi Bridgey - greetings from the bottom of the valley! Gonna be following your thread this year. I want to read some Jim Thompson, so I liked your review of The Killer Inside.

Excellent review of Joyland I will remember your recommendation when I want to tackle Stephen King

Hi both, thanks for the comments. :)

I've been considering Joyland for a while and I think I will be putting it on my list. Considering how Stephen King focuses so much on horror, I think I like his books better when he moves away from that. (I know there are horror themes in The Dark Tower books, but I don't think it's the main focus.)

Really enjoyed your review of Joyland, even if I'm unlikely to ever read King.

>4 Bridgey: Most of the dings that Joyland got was from people that believe that King must write only horror or that expected horror from it...

Thanks all for your comments, feel free to leave a link for your 2015 reading. I have found Annie and Baswood. :)

>4 Bridgey: Other than The Stand, I haven't read any Stephen King. I have never been able to read horror, and have an even harder time watching it. I've seen The Shining and it creeped me out for ages. Your review of Joyland sounds like one that I might enjoy.

Hi Nana

Give it a try. And if you fancy a bit of King without the horror maybe have a look at the Dark Tower series.

Rain on the Dead - Jack Higgins ***

Jack Higgins has to be my favourite author of all time. I have read every single book (over 60) he has written, and preorder each new release as soon as I am able. In recent years he has concentrated solely on his Sean Dillon creation. An ex IRA enforcer that now works for the Prime Ministers secret army which consists of his usual band of colleagues, fighting against terrorism and for the safety of the UK/world. Rain on the Dead showcases Dillon in his 21st adventure under of the pen of Jack Higgins.

In my opinion any new Jack Higgins release will be read by mainly 2 categories of readers, the new reader unused to his style or stories, and the avid reader. Obviously I fall into the second group which is why I find it so hard to rate this latest offering with anything more than 3 stars.

What is it about?

Following on from the previous book, Dillon and co are still trying to pit their wits against al-Qaeda, and the new mysterious ‘Master’. The novel opens with an attempt on former USA President Jake Cazalet's life, of course the secret army are in the neighbourhood and disaster is averted. However, when Dillon does a little digging into the assassins identity, a few ghosts from his earlier career in the IRA resurface. Couple this with the added pressure being forced on the army from AQ and the Muslim Brotherhood and it seems highly unlikely any of the good guys will survive. This time it is personal and there will be nothing that can stop the blood flowing.

What did I like?

The story, when you get down to the basics is typical Higgins. Plenty of gunfire and killings, action every few pages accompanied by a plot that speeds along without getting bogged down in too much detail. The storyline is modern and up to date with current world issues that frequent the news on a daily basis, whilst still being able to relate to past troubles such as the IRA troubles. Higgins has always managed to create colourful characters that are easily to visualise and they are in abundance here. The book at just over 300 pages was an easy read and the pages really did fly by.

What didn’t I like?
As mentioned this is the 21st outing by Dillon and co, and anyone who has followed the series may have a problem. There just isn’t anything that hasn’t been written before. I have noticed in the last few releases that the storylines were getting more and more predictable but this has to be the worst yet. The characters are just acting totally unbelievable for the situation they find themselves, the speech is formulaic, sparse and at times just boring. The prefix ‘said’ is used on nearly every dialogue, and the only real substitute is the word ‘demanded’ – often when there isn’t really any need for it.
Unusually for Higgins this novel really does have far too many characters that seem to dip in and out so often that it gets confusing. Bearing in mind that the majority of characters are supposedly hardline extremists, they change to the opposing side on a whim. The details of the plot are just not feasible at times and everything just seems, well, wooden.

As I have said, I love Higgins but this latest release is possibly, in my eyes, his weakest for a long time. There is only one other novel that is this poor and that was written in the mid seventies, called Sheba. I am sorry to say this, but although it isn’t time that he hung up his pen for good, it is certainly time he put away Dillon and the rest of the crew.

Going back to the beginning of the review, I stated that there are other readers that maybe are discovering Higgins for the first time. To those it may well seem that the plot and characters are fresh and exciting. I wish I could agree. To those readers I advise to try something else first, such as the brilliant ‘Eagle has Landed’ or my own favourite ‘A Prayer for the Dying’.

I know I will buy his next book, and to be fair at his age I should probably be grateful he is still releasing new material, I just hope I find it a little more satisfying.

Bad luck with the latest Jack Higgins. I was just thinking about any authors that are still living and if there are any that I would read as soon as they came out. Probably only Hilary Mantel.

Baswood - there aren't many that I would rush out to buy either. Cormac McCarthy, Stephen King and Jack Higgins are the only ones I can think of. I have varied tastes :)

I used to enjoy a good Jack Higgins novel back in the 70's. I think that The Eagle Has Landed was my favorite of the ones I read.

Barry, I love Hilary Mantel. I was hoping the third book in The Wolf Hall trilogy would be out sometime this year, but I'm afraid I've heard that it won't be. I do have A Place of Greater Safety sitting on my bookshelf, and this may just be the year that I actually pick it up to read.

Thanks for the review of Joyland. I just finished Mr. Mercedes and while I enjoyed the book thought it would not draw me back to King. Your review made me reconsider that and Joyland is on my watch list.

Hi there! I like the style of your reviews. They really give a good impression of what to expect from a book.

>4 Bridgey: I especially enjoyed this review. I might want to give the book a try some time. I'm currently reading 22.11.63. Have you read it?

Hi Oscar,

I've not read that one yet. It's languishing on a shelf :)

Tom, I think that Mr Mercedes will be the next King book I read. I think he is releasing a sequel to it at some point this year.

Just a quick question.... how do you put the link in the comment to the previous comment you are replying to?

>20 Bridgey:. Do you see the symbol > before the number 20? That will refer back to your post just prior to my reply here. If I put the symbol and the number 4 it will take me back to your post in number 4. Like this >4 Bridgey:.

Is that what your question meant?

>20 Bridgey: Bridgey: I'd like to read more about the detective in Mr. Mercedes...maybe I will get drawn back into King.

Yes Nana. I tried Cutting and pasting, lol. But it didn't work (obviously) :) >21 NanaCC: ---- it worked ;)

Hi Tom, I'll make that my next read after War of the Worlds and let you know how it goes.

A Town Like Alice - Nevil Shute *****

I first discovered Nevil Shute a year or so ago when I picked up a copy of ‘On the Beach’, I loved every page and it has remained in my top five reads and will probably always stay there. Since this I have been slowly working my way through the rest of his 20 plus novels. Unlike most people I have never seen the film of ‘A Town Like Alice’, so other than the blurb description I didn’t really know what to expect.

What is it about?
We uncover the story of Jean Paget as told to the reader through her Solicitor Noel Strachan. Following the death of his wealthy client a considerable fortune is inherited by Jean in the form of an annual income and a trust fund that will not mature until she reaches her mid thirties. Because of a clause in the will Strachan is able to advance Jean a lump sum should he feel the expenditure is worthy. Once Jean is identified as the benefactor a meeting is arranged between the two which quickly develops into a friendship. Jean tells her tale of how she spent the war as a prisoner on a forced march through Malaya. During this time she encountered a friendly Australian POW who, through his acts of kindness helps her survive. They fall in love but circumstance tears them apart. The rest of the novel details her life in post war years and how she decides to carve out a new future from her newfound wealth.

What did I like?
Shute always manages to write convincingly of a time that no longer exists, a time when manners and chivalry were abundant. He really drags you into the lives of the characters and allows you to feel their emotions. This book is essentially a love story, the type of genre I would normally run a mile from, but the author manages to make it into so much more than that. When he needs to add effect Shute is not afraid to let you have it with full force. You feel the pain suffered during those prison camp years, you are appalled by the brutality suffered under the Japanese guards, and more than anything you want to right the injustices. The book is set in the 40s/50s and although at times it may seem a little dated, that just adds to its charm.

What didn’t I like?
There wasn’t really anything to dislike, but if I was forced to be picky I would say that the 3rd quarter of the book did get slightly repetitive, but this was saved by the ending.

Would I recommend it?
Definitely, although I still think On the Beach is his greatest novel, this also wouldn’t be a bad place to start.

Enjoyed your excellent review of A Town Like Alice

Great review of A Town Like Alice. I'm very interested in the Malaysia aspect. I believe last year's Booker Prize winner has a similar theme regarding Japanese treatment of POW's as (expendable) labor.

Really good review Bridgey - I like the look of Nevil Shute's books whenever I pick one up - which is why I've got a few of his on the TBR shelves (that I really should get to!). A Town Like Alice isn't one of them, and although I always heard of the film, I've not seen it either; I'm wishlisting this one without any hesitation.

>25 Bridgey:. I have heard of A Town Like Alice, but never felt drawn to it until now. Very good review.

>25 Bridgey: I think this is the only Shute I've read (although I did read his autobiography). It could be described as a love story, but I think you're right that there is so much more to it than just that. Might be just me, but I was left with the idea that the solicitor might have had a thing for Jean, only was far too conscious of his position with respect to her trust fund ever act upon it.

I'm enjoying your reviews. I think I liked The Killer Inside Me more than you, but your mention of Child of God in connection with The Killer Inside Me led me straight to Amazon where I purchased it for my Kindle. It will be my first Cormac McCarthy

I really don't like horror and supernatural, and for that reason there is a lot of Stephen King I won't read. I really liked Under the Dome and 11/22/63. For years I avoided The Shining, but finally tried it a couple of years ago. I was very much enjoying the story of a young boy growing up, his fears and problems, and was thinking about how well Stephen King was able to portray this little boy and his troubled parents. Then all the supernatural and horror stuff began to happen. Although I finished the book, I can't help but feel that it could have been an excellent book as a straight-forward coming of age book. So, I'm somewhat concerned about Joyland--how big of a part do the supernatural elements play? Other than supernatural elements, the book does sound like one I might like.

Your review of A Town Like Alice really captures the feeling of the novel as seen in the old BBC/Masterpiece Theatre series, which was gutwrenchingly memorable. I haven't read the book and have actually hesitated to do so because the filmed adaptation was so moving. Sometimes a book and the movie need to be approached as entirely separate from each other as one can ruin the other in the mind's eye. The BBC people seem to be pretty good at capturing the essence of a thing, but one never knows. Anyway, I enjoyed your comments.

>30 Helenliz: Helenz, definitely right there. I liked the way his colleague approached the subject with him and then the solicitor avoided him for weeks :)

>31 arubabookwoman: Arubabookwoman The story does have a supernatural edge to it, and without that theme the book would fall flat on it's face. But it is more of a constant background theme rather than always in your face. There aren't many 'horror' moments in this novel. It was just a really nice read.

The War of the Worlds - H. G. Wells ***

I left it a few weeks before I reviewed WOTW to see if I would change my mind about this book. I haven't.

I think most people by now know the story of Martian's landing in London and creating havoc and death. The novel is written in the first person by an unnamed narrator (something I usually enjoy). We follow his journey from when the aliens first land all the way through to their eventual demise.

The book is approaching 120 years old, so I anticipated that it may be more than a little dated, but this hasn't bothered me with other classics from the same era. For some reason, and I can't put my finger on it, War of the Worlds just really failed to engage with me. Very rare do I find reading a book a chore but this was one of those occasions. I fully understand the foresight shown by Wells and the way he used and described scientific information must have been really revolutionary for the time, and because of this I can see why it is still revered today. But for me it didn't work. I found the plot extremely monotonous and at times just wishing the narrator would get zapped by the heat ray. On more than one occasion I felt like I was reading an AA route planner as we constantly get told the place names he is travelling through (which would probably help if I knew my way around London, but I don't). The house scenario really detracted from the flow of the plot and just seemed a slog through, that twist for me was a little unbelievable (even more so than being invaded by Martians) and although it allowed Wells a chance to include a little segment of horror, the whole concept of the curate and narrator being imprisoned for 2 weeks was a step too far for me.

I know many people are screaming at me right now, telling me to look deeper into the novel, examine how the appearance of the Martians has the potential to reflect humanities own future or how Britain at the time was an empire crushing many parts of the globe and War of the worlds could be seen as a vision or warning of our own fate. I have to agree that all these themes (and many more) are there for the reader, but I have to be fully absorbed in the plot to want to dig that little bit deeper. In reality my enjoyment would only warrant a one star rating, but that wouldn't be fair. The book did have it's moments of brilliance and I would be the first one to put my hand in the air and admit that it is more down to my personal taste rather than the novel, you only have to see the hundreds of 5 star reviews for this. I wish I had liked it, I really do, I tried my best, but 3 stars is the most I can offer.

Has it put me off reading further H G Wells novel? Not really, possibly just lowered my expectations. Maybe the next one I choose will be one where I haven't heard the story before so hopefully the writing and events will be totally fresh.

Mr Mercedes - Stephen King *****

What is it about?

Stephen King used to be my favourite horror author, but lately he is fast becoming one of my favourite authors regardless of genre. Throughout his career he has deviated at times from his standard of shocking his constant readers (The Body, Hearts in Atlantis), but lately it seems that non horror is becoming a more frequent staple.
Mr Mercedes features recently detective Bill Hodges, a man who was exceptionally good at his job, but with a cloud hanging over him in the form of the unsolved Mr Mercedes case. Now sat at home with nothing but daytime tv for company, he feels depressed and useless, his mind wandering over both past events and his own suicide. Out of the blue he is contacted by the Killer and this proves to be the shot in the arm he needs, believing the killer will strike again Hodges once again puts his detecting skills to the test, but can he find the killer in time?

What did I like?
King has created one of his most real ‘bad’ guys in the form of Brady Hartsfield, in this character you will find no supernatural powers, no links with the dead or no demonic possession, but you may well find something even more horrifying, the concept that the most twisted criminals could very easily be living next door to you. As the novel progresses we discover more of Brady’s background history and the levels of depravity to which he has stooped, it will even make you look at your own neighbours in a different light. King allows both Hartsfield and Hodges to share their views with the reader, with almost alternating chapters being told by each character. The reader can see the cat and mouse chase from both viewpoints, and although this makes the reader aware of the killer very early in the novel, it takes nothing away from the suspense.

Would I recommend?
Definitely. But not only to fans of King, but also to readers that previously may have been put off discovering King by his being typecast as a writer of horror.

Allhallows's eve - Richard Laymon ***

We all have a guilty pleasure or two in our reading lives, and Richard Laymon is one of mine. You can't really expect much of a storyline, virtually no character depth and a plot usually so full of holes you could use it to strain your veg. But what you will usually find is a fast paced, gore filled, taboo ridden storyline that will either have you reaching for more or tossing it straight in the bin. A writer that has more of an acquired taste you will be hard pressed to find.

Anyone who is used to Laymon will be familiar with his themes, and Allhallow's Eve doesn't deviate far from his usual approach. It features a town where a house was the location for a grisly murder several years previous, lately however it has been attracting attention once again. With Hallowe'en fast approaching several of the townsfolk have been invited to a party at the house on Allhallows' eve, but the invitation doesn't say who is the host.

As normal the book is made up of a number of 'sub stories' that all come together to make a sort of grand finale. Expect to find death, past misdemeanours, rape and the almost schoolboyish descriptions of the female form that only Laymon could get away with.

Not the best of his books, but not the worst either. The plot rattles along at enough of a pace to hold my interest, but the ending was far too short, rushed and didn't really flow that well. At 290 pages it's worth a try but not as an introduction to the author.

Your thoughts on Mr. Mercedes make me want to read it.

I admit to a guilty pleasure with Richard Laymon.

>39 baswood: Baswood, I didn't have you down as a Laymon reader. :)

I tend to only read one or two of his a year. They can get a little samey. But they are certainly different to other authors.

>38 OscarWilde87: I read somewhere that Mr Mercedes is going to form the first part of a trilogy.

>36 Bridgey: Mr Mercedes sounds like a Stephen King I might actually be able to read. :). I did like The Stand.

>42 NanaCC: I read the Stand years ago, but bought the complete and uncut edition last week. Gonna keep it for when I got a spare month. lol :)

Exocet - Jack Higgins ****

Anyone who is familiar with Higgins will find all his usual trademarks here: the second shot that smashes the spine, the pianist that plays 'A Foggy Day in London Town', alcohol by the bucketload, a trained killer that feels life is a game and the ruthless commanding officer who uses his employees like pawns in a game. There are no real surprises to be found here, although there is a reduction in the amount of violence we normally find in a Higgins' novel.

The story centres around Gabrielle, a stunningly beautiful British agent, who is assigned with a mission to get close to a decorated Argentinian officer Raul Montera. Things become complicated when they fall in love, but one or the other must choose loyalty to either their country or their hearts. The famous Exocet missile is also a prominent feature with Argentina desperately trying to get their hands on more in an attempt to swing the war more favourably in their direction. Throw in some Russian involvement and you are left with a sort of cold war/love story/boy's adventure.

Exocet as far as I am aware is Higgins' only book that is set during the Falklands war and was actually released in the same year as the conflict. Although this meant that Higgins was able to integrate real life events into the plot, it also unfortunately allows the book to have a rushed feel to it. Fans of the Sean Dillon series will find many of the novel themes and traits start to come to fruition here, including General Ferguson.

Worth a look for fans, but not somewhere I would recommend a new reader start as an introduction to the author. Maybe this is the point where the storylines started to become slightly generic? I am unsure but it definitely has a déjà vu feel to the writing.

Recalled to Life - Robert Silverberg ****

Silverberg is a bit of an anomaly to me, I seem to either love his books or absolutely detest them. Prior to discovering Recalled to life there were 4 of his novels that I have read, the first two were brilliant (Tower of Glass & Invaders from Earth) but the next two were among the worst books I have ever read (Dying Inside & Son of Man), with this in mind I decided to give him one more chance and when I came across this book in a second hand shop picked it up. Although not as good as I had hoped it did manage to restore my interest in his works.

What's it about?

Set in 2033 a group of scientists have discovered a method that allows recently deceased corpses to be brought back to life. This is achieved through a combination of hormone treatment and electrical stimulation, but the success rate becomes lowered the longer after death the process occurs. The novel centres mostly around Harker, an ex state Governor that was forced out of office for trying to introduce his own ideals into the wheels of power. Now partner in a law firm he is approached by the medical lab to both front their PR campaign and advise on any legal implications the process may have, seeing this as a risky but lucrative chance to rebuild his career, he accepts. As you would expect there is mass opposition to the procedure from both political and religious groups, armed with nothing more than his own self belief can he manage to salvage his own reputation and convince the American public that 'reanimation' is nothing to be afraid of?

What did I like?

The story at just over 140 pages (although the type was tiny) moved along quickly enough, and you had the feeling that Silverburg really put a lot of thought into the varying degrees of reaction such an announcement might evoke. We encounter the families of the recently deceased begging for them to be brought back to life, expertly contrasted with the some peoples fear that once dead they will be reanimated against their wishes citing the concern that their souls may be left in limbo. There are more than a few unexpected twists, and after a few dozen pages I really thought I had the ending all sewn up, but thankfully this wasn't the case. The science seems plausible without going into any mind boggling detail and characters easily relatable.

What didn't I like?

I suppose the biggest question poised throughout mankind's history is 'What happens to me after I die?'. I really wish that the novel had explored a little more Silverberg's ideas of the afterlife. We have a small taster now again, but that really just left me wanting more. It wasn't until I had read the book that I discovered he actually rewrote much of the novel in the 1970's (mine was printed in 1962) so maybe this next addition elaborated on these themes.

Would I recommend?

The book really does leave the reader with a sense of wonder. What does death hold for us? How would we react if there was potential to 'bring us back', and what choices would we make? Definitely worth a look whether as an introduction to the author or as someone already familiar with his work. If you do buy the book, I would really advise you not to read the blurb on the back, it gives away a number of the plot twists and just ridiculous that it was included in this way.

Enjoyed your review of Recalled to Life, Robert Silverberg

I've found the same with Robert Silverberg. I liked some of his books, but wasn't impressed at all by Dying Inside, which I found very dull. I also found the same with Robert Heinlein though, enjoying some of his work until I had the misfortune of reading the dreadful Farnham's Freehold. Maybe it's a thing with sci-fi authors called Robert.

>46 baswood: Thanks Baswood

>47 valkyrdeath: Any of Silverbergs books that you think I would like?

>48 Bridgey: Mostly the ones I liked were short story collections that I read many years ago. I can't remember the specific ones. I read Dying Inside more recently, and also The World Inside which didn't have much of an impact on me either.

Last Sword of Power - David Gemmell ****

I was first introduced to Gemmell last year through the Jerusalem man books, really enjoyed them and decided to try and read a few more of his novels. I dug into his catalogue and found that the Jerusalem books were written as a part of a larger series of books that primarily dealt with Sipstrassi stones – a powerful stone that has the ability to grant the person who holds it unimaginable power. Last sword of power is the sequel to The Ghost king, and although set a number years in the future we still find a number of the same characters with in the pages. This is one of those books where reading the series in order, although not totally necessary, would really help understand the plot as much of the action relates to previous events.

Gemmell has mixed his own brand of fantasy with both real life events and various ancient myths from a number of different sources. We find Arthurian legend side by side with Greek gods, Roman history intertwined with Gemmells own creations. The plot, as regular readers would expect, isn’t all that straight forward. There is a fairly large cast of characters for a book of just over 300 pages, and just to make things even more confusing a number of these have more than one name. But the gist of the novel is that the world is in turmoil, an evil ‘God’ is wreaking havoc on the earth and the only King who is able to stop him has had his soul trapped in Hell. It leaves a fairly motley bunch of characters to try and save the day by battling the enemy, traversing great distances and, more often than not, facing up to their own hidden demons.

Expect plenty of action, lots of fantastical characters and enough magic to keep even Gandalf happy. I really enjoyed the book, but there were just a few things that stopped me giving it a full 5 stars. The characters names really got on my nerves, especially when the same person may have up to 3 or 4 names. While this in itself gets me a little confused, the main issue was that many of the names were so similar. Quite often I would find myself skimming back a few pages to try and find who was who (it didn’t help that I put it down for a few days either). The only other flaw I found, and it isn’t anything major, was that much of the plot just seemed to rely on convenience or was just explained away with the alternate dimension get out clause. As I said, this wasn’t anything that took anything away from the plot too much, but it was noticeable.

Well worth a read if you are a fan of heroic fantasy, but probably not the place I would start as an introduction to Gemmell.

Taken at the Flood - Agatha Christie ***

What is it about?

Written in 1948 (first published under the name 'There is a Tide'), the title is taken from a line in Shakespeare's Julius Caesar. The majority of the book takes place just after the second world war, although we are privy to a few flashbacks to events previously taken place during the war years. The novel is typical Agatha Christie, we encounter the wealthy deceased and the family squabbles that result from the reading of the will, a beautiful girl, jealousy and of course the various alibis and motives. Although this is a Poirot novel, we meet him in the opening pages and then he is absent for the first half of the book.

We follow the Cloade family, a mismatch of individuals that although relatively successful in their own fields have always relied upon their elder brother Gordon Cloade's income. Having been promised all their lives that upon his death each member will be bequeathed enough money to live out their days comfortably, they are shocked to discover that he has taken a young bride and unfortunately been killed during an air raid before having chance to adjust his will resulting in their being cut from the inheritance. However, Gordon is his bride's second husband, and there is a rumour that her first husband may still be alive. If he can be found then the marriage would be illegal and the Cloade fortune would once again be in the hands of the family. When a stranger turns up in the village from South Africa, a glimmer of hope rises and Poirot is employed to try and iron out the creases. What follows is a story rich with murder, blackmail and secret identities. Which side will win the battle of wits between the family and the recently widowed Rosaleen, who governed by her roguish brother David make a very formidable team.

What did I enjoy/not enjoy?

The first half of the book was spent fleshing out the Cloade characters, allowing the reader to dig into their individual personalities and histories. Christie is a master of creating fully rounded characters that the reader can easily empathise with or dislike. This created a very clever build up of tension before the introduction of Poirot, allowing us to try and second guess what he will make of the situation or what plan of attack he will adopt. Some readers may have been a little dismayed that their hero did not arrive until the second half, but for me this was a welcome change to the normal books.

There were a few aspects of 'Taken at the Flood' that stopped me giving my usual high mark for Christies books. Firstly I found the way the plot unravelled a little disappointing, although there were a few twists and turns, many of these I had second guessed. The ending didn't have the same sense of realism that many of the other titles in the series has, and I found myself wondering if it would ever have really worked out like that, or was it just too obvious. Unusually for me I had worked out correctly the killers identity a number of chapters before it became confirmed (which I became a little peeved at as this is one of the few Poirot books that I had not seen the tv adaptation for). The other detail I found issue with was the way that Christie kept referencing the thoughts of the characters, I have noticed this in other novels but not to the same frequency as here. At one point is was almost after nearly every other speech. I just felt it was often unnecessary and distracted me away from the storyline.

Well worth a look if you are a fan of either Christie or the Poirot series, but not a novel I would advise a reader unfamiliar with Christie to start with.

The Mediterranean Caper - Clive Cussler ****

I'm relatively new to Clive Cussler, but decided to read his books as there seemed to be a fair similarity to Ian Fleming and Jack Higgins. This is my second book by the author, and it definitely will not' be my last. This was also published under the title 'Mayday'.

What is it about?

Although this is the first published book in the Dirk Pitt adventure series, it was actually the second written (Pacific Vortex being the first). The novel opens with a WW 1 plane attacking an American base on the Greek island of Theros. The conning tower issues a mayday warning requesting immediate assistance; luckily Dirk is flying nearby and answers the call of distress. Although successful in stopping the assault it is not without cost and he has to land for repairs at the same base. Kirks original destination is 'The First Attempt' a marine research vessel anchored just off shore from where the attack took place. Unfortunately they have also been having issues with some accidents that have hindered their research in trying to find a fish that is believed to have been extinct for millions of years. Is there any connection between the unexpected visitor and the constants mishaps? Can Pitt use his wits to figure out the reason for the plane’s actions? And who is the mysterious German millionaire Von Till?

What did I like?
Action books have always been my favourite genre, and picking up a Cussler book seems to be the next logical step after exhausting practically all of Jack Higgins catalogue. The book is full of action and the pages just seem to melt away. Dirk Pitt is a typical man’s man, strong, womanising, hard drinking, and even harder hitting. This is a man that gets shot in the leg and looks down as if an ant has nipped him and carries on with the task at hand. The plot is totally unrealistic, but that just adds to the charm (escapism at its finest). Some readers may be put off by the apparent sexism, but I think you have to read it within the context of the era it was written (1973) and the subject matter involved, for me it just adds to the atmosphere and cements Pitt as a Bond like character. The book seems very well researched and Cussler’s enthusiasm for technology and science really does start to shine through.

What didn’t I like?
The only thing I can put my finger on, and the reason for the 4 stars instead of five, was the ending. Although not written in the first person, the majority of the book features Pitt and his surroundings, because of this were are allowed to see and feel most things as they happen. The ending seemed to just disregard this and in order to tie up the loose ends it added to previous scenes, for example if Pitt sent a telegram earlier in the novel and received a reply, the reply was kept secret until now, when surely we should have found out the same time as him.

Would I recommend?
Definitely. Although from reading other reviews it seems that this is one of the weaker Dirk Pitt novels, I always find it best to start at the beginning of a series rather than midway. If you like the ‘Boys own’ style of adventure then give it a try. Cussler is unlikely to win the Nobel literature prize, but if you take his books at face value, I’m sure you will have a good time.

The Darling Buds of May - H E Bates ***

Like many people I was first introduced to the Larkin family through the TV drama with the brilliant David Jason, it was one of those programs I remember from my childhood and I never realised that it was taken from a group of novels. We follow the trials and tribulations of the ever increasing family as they go about their day to day lives. Anyone familiar with the ITV adaptation will already know most of the story, very little has been changed from the original text. The only major difference is the overt sexuality present within the novels pages, in particular with the Larkin’s eldest daughter Mariette, who is not so sweet and innocent as I seem remember.....

Like most books written in the same period the novel portrays a post war idyllic life, where days can be filled with strawberry picking, eating, meadow walks and more eating. The Larkin world is changed when a good natured, slightly drippy tax inspector calls upon them to query the lack of tax returns, he soon falls for Mariette and encouraged by Ma and Pa spends an ever increasing amount of time at the farm, slowly changing his whole outlook on the world outside his office.

There are two ways of viewing this book and each will influence your outlook on the Larkin brood. On one hand we have the jolly local farmer, someone that can always be relied upon, a steadfast member of the community that although a little rough around the edges manages to charm even his most prudish neighbours. A bit of a rogue that isn’t afraid to bend the rules but all’s well that ends well. On the other hand we have a man who is tax avoider, possibly a bit of a sex pest and generally without much of a conscience (especially if it means his family are kept happy). But whatever your opinion, there is something in the book for nearly everyone.

I have only given 3 stars because there were a few things that really got on my nerves. The way ‘Pa’ speaks in dialect really grates on me. The odd ‘Perfic’ is fine, but I have always hated reading books that have characters speaking in this way. It just annoys me. The other reason was the constant reference to food, and what they were going eat, what they had eaten previously, what they would like to eat and currently eating. Sometimes it read like a cookery book.

So did I enjoy the book? I suppose in parts I did, but not enough that I would really be able to recommend it. This is the first book in a series and I am unsure if I will ever bother to seek out the rest. Having said that, there is a small part of me that wants to know what else the Larkin family may have in store for them.... so you never know.

I had no idea that Darling Buds of May was based on a book. I watched that as a kid but all I remember now is David Jason saying perfic. Doesn't sound like the book is particularly worth hunting out.

I think David Jason made it a brilliant program, maybe he should have written the book :)

Death from a Top Hat ****

This is the first book in a trilogy that show case the talents of the ‘Great Merlini’. It features a ‘locked room mystery whereby the murder is seemingly committed by an unknown assailant with no means of entrance or exit. The plot follows a typical Agatha Christie type trail, where there are a number of suspects and each have their own motive(s) for the crime.

Merlini, accompanied by the detective assigned to the case and helped by a local writer must unravel the various alibis to find who really was responsible. However, as each suspect is an expert in the various magic arts (ventriloquism/escapism/psychics etc) it will take a lot more than average police work to bring the culprit to justice.

Written in 1938 the book had aged considerably, but still manages to keep the readers interest, in particular if you have ever wondered how the old tricks were accomplished you may find a few answers here. At times I felt as if the storyline was a little bogged down by facts and figures and a few characters quite wooden, but all in all a nice little piece of ‘escapism’, easily worth 4 stars as a stand alone novel, but I don’t think I will read the rest of the trilogy though.

Knights of Dark Renown - David Gemmell ****

This is one of those books that has Gemmell doing what he does best, a fantasy novel set in a different yet similar world to our own, one we can can recognise from history but with enough magic and mayhem to transport us into a whole new experience. Much of the plot is mingled with our own Arthurian legends and myths, but Knights of Dark Renown is as much a coming of age novel as heroic fantasy. We follow a young boy named Lug who possesses a number of strong powers, but he does not yet know how to control them or even their extent. One night he witnesses the Knights of the Gabala passing through a magic portal in order to protect the kingdom. The Knights never returned from this fateful mission, but one remained behind. Now branded a coward he travels the lands looking for redemption. Couple these two pathways with that of the wizard Maerlyn, who is able to breath life into his almost robotic creations, and you have an action packed 400 pages.

A new evil appears, with mass genocide of all citizens of nomadic descent taking place. Can the King be defeated and what part will Lug play? What happened to the missing Knights and how will their destiny play a part? We meet numerous colourful characters from wizards to warriors, and something I love about Gemmell is that we never really know who is next to get bumped off. He certainly doesn't get attached to his creations.

A really brilliant stand alone book from Gemmell, and one that I can easily recommend. I was tempted to award 5 stars, and although it came close I just thought there was something a little missing.

Harvest - Jim Crace ****

What is it about?

A bit of a strange book this. We follow the life of a village over seven days as it begins the difficult transition period from crop growing to sheep farming. The story is relayed through the eyes of a villager (Walter Thirsk) who became part of the community some twelve years previous, yet despite this is still seen by many as an 'outsider'. One day 3 new travellers show up on the land boundary with a view to joining the villagers, unfortunately this coincides with a fire that breaks out. What unfolds over the next few hundred pages is a lesson in humanity and the human condition, with characteristics that seemingly have remained unaltered throughout the generations. We encounter bravery, cowardice, superstition and bullying. We see the best in man and the worst, in Harvest, Crace has created a soap opera for the middle ages. Times are changing, the old ways of life are being pushed to one side and new farming methods are being introduced, uncertainty is rife and when the landowners cousin makes an appearance no ones future is safe.

What did I like?

For a start the novel seems incredibly well researched, it has numerous facts and details that a reader with even a slight interest in history will be enthralled by. Crace has created a realistic world where many things that we take for granted today are just simply unobtainable to the villagers. For instance I had never really thought about how people of old perceived the way the presented themselves, with mirrors a rarity and only a fleeting glimpse of a reflection in a dirty puddle did they wonder how they had aged or how they looked to their loved ones? This is a time when even a small injury could become life threatening or make a man unable to complete his daily chores, and no detail is omitted. It's a time when a bad winter or a poor spring could spell starvation for villagers reliant on natures bounty and by using Thirsk as his vessel we feel each smart and indignation as they are delivered. The author writes prose that is almost poetry, and it reminded me more than a little of Cormac McCarthy (with punctuation), the landscape descriptions are vividly painted and the daily activities are given in minute detail.

What didn't I like?

I love many different kinds of books, from Stephen King to Charles Dickens, I am willing to try almost any genre, but there has to be a storyline to keep me fully hooked. And this is where Harvest lost a star for me. At times I felt the storyline became impacted by the vast amount of descriptive writing. The indecisiveness of the narrator dragged a little too much and I just kept thinking at times 'Please do something... anything'. This may sound a little harsh and I have to admit I still loved Harvest, but it kept a very good book from turning into an exceptional book.

Would I recommend?

Definitely. This is the first time I have encountered the author, and I believe he has said he will not be writing any further novels, but I will be checking out his back catalogue.

Enjoyed your review of Harvest, Jim Crace. He is an interesting author and your review was very even handed.

Thanks Baswood. I am going to check out more of his books.

The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin - David Nobbs ****

What is it about?

I remember watching the tv programme as a child with my father, but never realised it was based on a book. So when I came across a copy I decided to give it try. The novel follows Reggie Perrin, a senior executive in Sunshine Deserts, a man who’s daily routine becomes so monotonous that it edges him further and further into a mid life crisis. Reggie’s behaviour becomes increasingly bizarre and we follow his descent into a near complete nervous breakdown. Struggling to hold onto his youth and unhappy with a seemingly bleak future he decides to dramatically change things.....

What did I like?

The tv series mirrors the book almost exact, but there were more than a few surprises with a number of the ‘riskier’ elements being left out (these will be more than apparent). Unusually for me I actually found myself laughing out loud on a number of occasions. The book is extremely well written with individuals that we can relate to in our own lives and work places. We get to know Reggie so well that whether we like it or not there are certain aspects of his character that we begin to recognise in ourselves, and that just adds to the humour.

What didn’t I like?

My only criticism, and the reason for not getting 5 stars, was that at times the plot just became slightly repetitive and the situations a little unrealistic. I won’t go into that any further as it would spoil various plot lines, but now and again I found myself thinking ‘Would he really get away with that?’

Would I recommend?

I very rarely venture in to the comedy aisle in a bookshop, and to be honest usually steer clear of the genre, but this is one of those occasions when I am glad I tried something different. So would I recommend it? Definitely. So much so that I have just ordered the next book in the series, ‘The Return of Reginald Perrin’.

>58 Bridgey: I enjoyed your review of Jim Crace's Harvest. This is on my TBR too.

>61 Bridgey: I actually rented the DVDs of that series just a few months back and was curious about the book. Going by your review I might have to check it out.

Of Mice and Men - John Steinbeck *****

What was it about?

For some reason I have reached my mid thirties without ever reading Of Mice and Men, it bypassed me in school, I have never seen any film adaptation and my only knowledge of the plot was that it was about two friends and one liked rabbits. So I started the book not knowing what was to come and without any expectations. I am always wary reading novels that have been deemed ‘classics’, very often I find them not very entertaining and the sort of book that people only read because they are either made to, or feel they should. But at around 160 pages I decided to give the book a try. Essentially we follow the story of two friends, George and Lennie, they are two drifters looking for work at various ranch stands across California in the midst of the depression. The two characters are opposites, with one small and quick, the other large and mentally challenged, and yet against many odds their friendship has always managed to survive. Practically inseparable they follow their dream of earning enough money to allow them to buy their own plot of land and become self sufficient. Lennie is really a child trapped inside a man’s body, unfortunately for him it is a very powerful vessel and he is not able to judge his own strength, this causes all sorts of issues for the duo and the main reason why they have never been able to settle in one place for any length of time. The novel starts with a new job prospect and another step towards that American dream they both hold onto. As they have done many times they try to settle into normal life, but interference from others once again causes them to face the realisation that maybe it can’t all be as simple as they would like. Prejudice, racism, life and death coupled with loneliness, ambition and loyalty allow the reader to understand just how fragile our human existence really can be. Are we any more worthy of life than an old decrepit dog? Do we really control our own destiny?

What did I like?

The way that Steinbeck crams so many themes into such a short novel is amazing. This is my first book by him and I am sure it won’t be my last. The descriptions are vivid, the characters realistic and you really do find yourself lost in their world.

What didn’t I like?

I really can’t think of anything in particular that I can honestly say I disliked. Maybe I would have preferred the novel to have been a little longer, but it certainly was a case of quality over quantity.

Would I recommend?

Definitely. This is one of those books I wish had discovered much earlier. Even nearly 80 years after its first publication the messages that it conveys are as relevant today as ever.

>63 valkyrdeath: I just ordered thee tv series box set as well :) The book is available as trilogy as well and for the same price on amazon.

>62 reva8: It's worth a try. I'm going to order some of his when my TBR pile starts to get a little lower

>64 Bridgey: I just read Of Mice and Men last month, myself -- it took me until my 40s! -- and I had much the same reaction you did, especially being amazed at the way Steinbeck puts so much into such a short novel. The one difference is that I was very, very spoiled for the ending, right down to specific details... and I was deeply impressed that, even so, I still found it incredibly powerful.

It was my first Steinbeck, too, and now I'm very much looking forward to reading more.

Great review of Of Mice and Men. I haven't read it (yet), and I'm past 40 now.

Was thinking of trying Grapes of Wrath.... anyone else read it?

The Grapes of Wrath is on my TBR as a re-read. It has been many years since I last read it, but would say you can't go wrong.

The Big Sleep - Raymond Chandler *****

I have only recently discovered the Noir style of novel through James M Cain’s works and really enjoyed them. I love the way the story is conveyed through short sharp sentences, where barely a word seems wasted. Other authors may attempt to fluff up a novel in order to fill more pages, but this is certainly not the case here. Raymond Chandler seemed the next stop after Cain, so where better to start than with his first novel (written in 1939) featuring his famous investigator Phillip Marlowe.

What is it about?
Marlowe is summoned to the home of General Sternwood and employed to investigate a case of blackmail involving one of his two daughters. Marlowe accepts but things aren’t quite as they seem, and he becomes embroiled in multiple murders, enticed by numerous simmering broads and discovers a pornography ring. But this isn’t your usual murder mystery outing, Chandler has created a fairly intricate plot (I sometimes had to flick back a few pages to remember who was who) with a protagonist that only follows his own moral compass and not necessarily that of the law.

What did I like?
The descriptive language used has to be some of the best I have ever read, and to be honest I can’t understand why this novel has not quite achieved ‘classic’ status yet. Maybe it is because of the subject matter or just plain snobbery? The storyline never stagnates and the pages fly by. I am sure that whoever reads this book will come away with a few cutting remarks and one liners stuck in their head for months later.

What didn’t I like?
There wasn’t anything in particular that really stood out as a negative, but if I were to be really picky I did at times get slightly lost in the plot and found myself rereading a few pages to get my bearings back.

Would I recommend?
Definitely, whether you are a fan of the whole noir period or just want to have a taster, The Big Sleep is an ideal read. I am sure I will be picking out the rest of Chandler’s works shortly.

I love Chandler's writing style, especially as you say the descriptions. Which reminds me I haven't re-read one of his books in a while...

whoever reads this book will come away with a few cutting remarks and one liners stuck in their head for months later.?

I read that book a few years ago and loved it. So much fun. I remember very deliberately including those one liners in my review so I'd have them (I had a library copy).

I follow a mystery writer on my FB page, believe me, Chandler is considered classic in that circle!

Night of the Fox - Jack Higgins ****

Higgins is easily my favourite author, he may not be the most talented or refined writer in the world but when he is on form he is easily the best of the action/boys own adventure, with intricate plots and action dripping from every page he really knows his subject matter. But what really sets him apart from many of his fellow authors is his ability to weave fact into fiction, leaving the reader wondering if his story was ever reality. Higgins first successfully used this formula in The Eagle Has Landed and carried on developing it over the next decade or so, for those unfamiliar, it involves a modern reporter/historian digging into missions of the second world war that have been buried for decades, only to find that the truth was much stranger than they ever could have imagined.

What is it about?
It is quite difficult to write about the plot without spoiling any of the twists throughout the novel, but if I had to sum it up it would be this: Britain is on the threshold of the D Day landings, a select group of officers have been briefed on the invasion plans, however when one of these (Colonel Hugh Kelso) is injured over the English Channel and washed up in Jersey all plans could be destroyed if the Nazis manage to get their hands on him. In order to ensure this doesn’t happen the British send in Harry Martineau accompanied with Sarah Drayton to either rescue or silence Kelso. Meanwhile on the other side of the channel the Desert Fox (Rommel) has his own agenda to sway the progression of the war, part of which involves a visit to Jersey. With deception and subterfuge on both sides, will either complete their mission or will the missions be destroyed unknowingly by the others enemy?

What did I like?
What is there not to like? If you are a lover of books set during wartime then this is for you. Who doesn’t like reading about Nazi’s, undercover missions and men that would put a bullet between your eyes before they even give you a second look. I love the way Higgins builds the intrigue and leaves you second guessing what is going to happen next. He is truly one of those writers where I keep promising myself one more chapter and I will turn out the light, only to find the whole book has been eaten up.

What didn’t I like?
As mentioned Higgins tends to get ‘stuck’ on a formula now and again, and even though it has proved to be his success over the years, regular readers may find events repeated. Night of the Fox is no exception, and a number of the characters are rehashed. We have the tough Irish man, the girl who falls in love at the drop of a hat, the military man who having suffered personal tragedy no longer cares if he lives or dies and the ever present bad guy who is tired of the war and could possibly be a good guy underneath it all.

Would I recommend?
As an introduction to Higgins I would have to say look elsewhere first (my own personal favourites are The Eagle has Landed and Prayer for the Dying), having said that this novel is easily in the top 25% of his works and was written probably just as his creativity was starting to decline. Any fans of the author should lap this book up and I am sure than anyone unfamiliar to him will use this as a stepping stone to discover his 70+ other novels.

>72 avidmom: What mystery writer do you follow? :) I have only read the one Chandler book but will try and read them all in order.

Thinking I may buy all his and read in order :)

North Star - Hammond Innes *****

I have read a few Hammond Innes books over the past few years and always enjoyed them. I love the settings he chooses to write about (mostly the sea or icy locations) as he always manages to bring them to life for the reader. North Star is no exception, with the majority of the novel set against the backdrop of the Shetland Islands and North Sea.

What is it about?
Michael Randall is a man with a past, formerly an industrial activist he once witnessed an act of violence and now must decide on how to act. He resolves to leave his old way of life behind him and throws himself into the restoration of a recently wrecked trawler, however his old associates soon find him and in an attempt to apply pressure they makes things extremely awkward both inside and outside the law. Soon lives are at risk and decisions must be made. Michael Randall isn’t a particularly likeable person, he is a loner and often has a personality as changing as the weather that surrounds him, but he must face his demons and battle not just the enemy, but nature as well.

What did I like?
Innes is one of those writers that possess an ability to pack a lot of technical information into a book and yet not slow down the speed of the novel. It is obviously very well researched and although a lot of the technology used has since been eclipsed it really didn’t take anything away from the novel. Oddly enough I read this book while cruising through the North Sea, it made me realise just how brilliant his descriptions of nature really are, he can look at a wave and through his writing make the reader view it in a totally different light. The action when it comes is never over the top and nothing is sensationalised for the sake of a shock.

What didn’t I like?
I suppose my only issue with the book was that the content seems to have dated quite badly. We are no longer in a time of mass industrial action or in a time when people had to work or didn’t eat (at least in the UK). It appeared odd to me the reasons behind the various acts of sabotage, but a little bit of background reading made it mostly fall into place.

Would I recommend?
Definitely, this is my 3rd book by the author and I really can’t wait to get stuck into the next one. If you are a fan of action stories with a bit more depth than the normal offerings, you will love Innes.

>74 Bridgey: The mystery writer I follow is Jeri Westerson. She writes what she calls "medieval noir." Fun stuff.

Enjoyed your reviews - especially of the Higgins book. He is on my radar now!

>70 Bridgey: Interesting about The Big Sleep.

>70 Bridgey: You'll enjoy the rest as well. ;) Some are better than others, of course, but the biting wit and repartee between Marlowe and most other characters is always there to grin and laugh out loud at.

The Buried Giant - Kazuo Ishiguro ***

I have previously read two Ishiguro books, The Remains of the Day (which I loved) & A Pale View of the Hills (which I hated) so when I saw that he had released a new book that was quite far away from his usual genre I decided to pick it up and finally decide if he was an author I wanted to invest any more time in or just pass by.

What is it about?
The story is set in a fictional time, but it seems to be around the early middle ages, but a time that is equally mixed with fantasy as fact. British heritage and Arthurian myths are weaved together with the story of Axl & Beatrice, an aging couple that reside in a typical village of the time. Something is wrong though, and most people have trouble remembering things from the past with only snippets surfacing now and again. Despite this they both feel an overwhelming urge to visit their son in another village and with only instinct for guidance they set off. Along the way they meet a number of weird characters that either help or hinder their quest. The buried giant in question is that of memory, and are we always better off in knowing the past, or are some things better left covered up

What did I like?
I suppose that if I had to pick something it would be the way Ishiguro uses certain metaphors throughout the novel. The Buried Giant is obviously that of the memory loss, and the main theme of the book is whether or not some things are better left undiscovered. The first 20 pages or so started quite promising for me but I soon struggled with the repetition.

What didn’t I like?
Most of it. Firstly the annoying way that the characters names are repeated over and over and over again, also the affectionate term Princess (Axl’s term of endearment for his wife) was printed so much I felt like throwing the book across the room. The characters are totally one dimensional and speak in such an unbelievable way that every time I had to read their speech I could feel it grating on my nerves. At times I had to check I wasn’t reading a children’s novel as the story got more and more ridiculous, with events repeated on a 30ish page cycle… walk a bit, talk a bit (in a very unlikely manner) and then walk a bit more.

Would I recommend?
Not really. I know there are numerous subliminal messages littered throughout the text, but the story and writing itself just wasn’t enough for me to be bothered to dig down deep enough to find them. Personally I found the book a 1 * read, but I am not arrogant enough to believe that this lies entirely with the novel, and I must shoulder some of the blame. I know Ishiguro can write brilliantly, he can portray the human character as well as any other author, he just didn’t involve me enough here. Many people who have left negative reviews seem to have been shot down with “you didn’t understand it”, I think I understood most of it, but didn’t enjoy hardly any of it really. I find it very unlikely I will pick up another of his books again, unless it is a reread of The Remains of the Day.

>80 Bridgey:

Sorry that this one did not work for you. I loved it earlier this year - but it relies a lot on the correct pieces just clicking in your mind based on previous books/emotions I think and when it does not happen, it falls flat - which makes it one of those love/hate books.

Too bad about the book. I'm interested in your last paragraph. If we don't like a book, how much is our fault and how much is the author's? Although that is an odd way of putting it. It's not like you can quantify it. What I mean is when is a book bad and when is it just that we, the reader, just didn't get it, or read it right, or read it from the right perspective?

>82 dchaikin: It is an interesting question. And I will say that the comment in >80 Bridgey: of "you didn't understand it" is, to me, the most annoying and condescending reaction someone can have to a person's opinion. Sometimes it's true, of course, but there has to be some room for "I understood it, but I didn't like it."

>82 dchaikin: That would be a good one for the Questions for the Avid Reader thread.

Enjoying your reviews especially those that deal with Adventure/thriller type novels.

Like you I have read two novels by Ishiguro and while I enjoyed An artist of the floating world I really did not like never let me go

>84 RidgewayGirl: Noted. (If I can remember it!)

>82 dchaikin: when is a book bad and when is it just that we, the reader, just didn't get it, or read it right, or read it from the right perspective?

That's an interesting question. When I first tried to read Austen's Pride and Prejudice years ago, I couldn't get through the first half of the book and gave up. And then, just last year (or the year before?) I read it and loved it - because I finally caught on to the "snark" in Austen, where I hadn't before.

I wonder how many people have had a similar experience: Pick up a book hate it; pick it up later and love it or vice versa.

Hmm....

I'm a terrible book starter. Best if I read the opening 50 pages, then drop the book for a week and start over (I don't ever actually do exactly that, but I do drag out beginnings.). I just find it very hard to figure out how to read the book. So, it's something I think about a lot. I always wonder how I could have approached a book differently.

88 - I think that's a good point. There have been several things (particularly British literature) that I have to read a few chapters and then go back and restart just to get my brain to process the tone of the work. Then there's other things that are interesting plot/character wise but still feel like a slog no matter what I do.

I get that feeling when I have tried some of the 'classics', a year or so ago I tried Gulliver's Travels and just found it too stale to interest me. I suppose it depends on your mindset when you first pick up a novel, normally I read for fun and enjoyment, a way of escapism, and therefore maybe skim a number of themes. Having said that, I think if an author is talented enough they will drag me into the subplots, Cormac Mcarthy is a brilliant example of an author that can do this to me.

Rasputin: A Short Life - Frances Welch ****

After just coming back from a holiday to St Petersburg and a tour of the Yusupov palace, I actually visited the room where Rasputin met his more than sticky end. I was surprised at how little I really knew about the ‘mad monk’, and what I thought I knew was probably partially fictionalised anyway. I decided to find a book that would not be too heavy but give a fairly accurate account and general gist of the man that history has clouded in suspense.

What is it about?

Exactly as the title suggests it covers the life of Grigori Yefimovich Rasputin from his childhood to death. How he rose from humble peasant beginnings to unofficial advisor to one of the most rich & powerful families the world has world has ever seen. Shrouded in myth and secrecy, the author attempts to separate folklore and propaganda from actual events, but as is usual, this is easier said than done and much is still left to the reader to make up their own minds. Nothing is spared here and we learn as much of his varied sexual appetite as we do his political persuasions and thoughts on the times he lived in.

What did I like?

The book is written with a lot of humour, some tongue in cheek, some practically laugh out loud. It appears very well researched and draws upon a number of sources from the actual time period. Frances Welch is definitely a talented writer and manages to pack an awful lot of facts and figures without the book turning into too much of a laborious essay.

What didn’t I like?

When I was walking around the Yusupov palace the guide asked the question whether or not we thought that Rasputin was a ‘Bad’ person, the majority of non Russians in attendance agreed that they thought he was, whereas in contrast the staff at the museum and ‘locals’ thought the opposite. This wasn’t reflected at all throughout the book and I found the views to be very negatively biased, there was plenty to be said against Rasputin but little to display him in even a slightly positive light. I find it quite difficult to believe that a person with so much charisma and influence didn’t have any redeeming qualities. It would have been nice to have seen witness statements from both sides of the coin, I mean Rasputin wasn’t exactly a mass murderer or found guilty of infanticide.

Would I recommend?

I think I would. As I have said this book is more for the person that wants to know a little about a lot, and as a sort of semi brief introduction to the man you can’t go far wrong.

That sounds interesting. I would have been really annoyed with the blatantly negative portrayal. I read The Life and Times of Grigorii Rasputin several years ago and enjoyed it quite a bit. It might have been a little bit too lenient on him, but I think overall it painted a very accurate portrayal. He wasn't a bad person at all, I don't think, he just turned situations to his advantage where he could. I certainly don't think he's any worse than any politicians or lobbyists these days, he simply was able to make more of an impact given the political situation of Russia back then; and unlike many modern politicians, I don't believe he did anything with malicious intent towards anyone, he was merely ignorant of the larger picture of his actions.

>92 .Monkey.: I don't think he was bad either, just very clever and made the best for himself out of his high friendships. I don't think I would turn down the chance of having all his perks. :) Just ordered "The Life and Times of Grigorii Rasputin" be nice to see a more balanced account.

You'll have to let me know what you think when you read it! Honestly I'd love to have been able to meet him, he must have been incredibly charismatic to charm his way up the social ladder like he did, into such a position! Granted, luck was on his side with Nicholas being a pretty flaky leader and capitulating to Alexandra at every turn, but even still, quite an achievement for an uneducated peasant.

>94 .Monkey.: What do you think about his 'mystical' abilities? These are really glossed over in the book I read. I am a big sceptic of things like that, but it does make you wonder...

Figures in a Landscape - Barry England *****

I have always been a fan of the action and adventure novel, in particular the type of book where prisoners escape and are tracked whilst fleeing across a difficult terrain. So when having a browse in a second hand book store I came across Figures in a Landscape I decided it was worth a shot. Interestingly Barry England has only ever written two novels, this and No Man’s Land which was published 27 years later.

What is it about?

As far as storylines go, you can’t get much simpler than this. Two prisoners of war (Ansell and MacConnachie) escape from a forced march into the surrounding countryside. Made to keep moving through a desolate and unforgiving terrain they meet danger at every turn. Constantly being tracked and assaulted by air and land troops they are unable to rest or obtain refuge. Each passing hour sees them become more and more fatigued and sooner or later they must either stand and fight or surrender. Mistakes begin to happen as small cracks appear in their strength and logic. As much a tale of friendship and trust we follow the duo through each painstaking footstep where either ones mistake could spell the ultimate disaster.

What did I like?

England is a writer that isn’t afraid to pull any punches and when the action arrives it is fast and extremely graphic with no words wasted, and yet these passages are intermixed with brilliant descriptions of the surrounding lands. There is no background information and we are never made aware of the reasons for the conflict or nationalities of those involved, for me this keeps the reader focussed on the here and now and you really do feel as if you are part of the escaped duo. I found myself willing them on to survive against the ever increasing odds of capture, and struggled to put the book to one side. It really makes you stop and think if your own survival instinct could ever be as strong

What didn’t I like?

The only real thing that I found annoying (and this is a small whinge) was that it was quite difficult to judge the distances that were travelled throughout the novel. Occasionally it seemed a little inconceivable that they were overlooked or not apprehended and maybe if a map was included showing the areas described it would have added to the reading experience.

Would I recommend?

For anyone that enjoys these type of stories then yes, my only regret is that England really doesn’t have much of a back catalogue, if he had I am sure I would have ordered the lot and be working my way through it. It was also nominated for the booker prize, shame it wasn’t successful, it may have catapulted the author into the limelight and fuelled his creativity.

>95 Bridgey: I'm certainly a skeptic, but there is definitely a lot he was involved in that has no explanation. There's no question that Alexei had the disease and a few times, if I recall, was as good as dead, and yet somehow, with Rasputin's intervention, he was healed. There is no way to explain it, no science to support it, but also no doubting that somehow, it happened. Lots of people back then wanted to discredit him and tried explaining the ways he supposedly faked it, but none of those hold merit. Life and Times does go into the mystic aspect a bit, though of course, it can draw no real conclusions.

Gone to Texas - Forrest Carter ****

Like most people I have seen the brilliant film ‘The Outlaw Josey Wales’ starring Clint Eastwood, but I never realised that it was actually based up a novel called ‘Gone to Texas’. Written in 1972 and originally published under the title ‘The Rebel Outlaw: Josey Wales’ it was republished in 1975 as ‘Gone to Texas’. The author Forrest Carter had a more than colourful life with several links to the KKK hidden in his past, and it’s worth having a quick read on Wiki about him.

What is it about?
Typical western, following the wronged outlaw as he evades capture from the enemy and must travel to safety. With a bounty on his head Wales must use both his guns and quick thinking to keep one step ahead of the ever increasing number of hunters looking to bring his down. Unlike a lot of other ‘cowboy’ novels Carter has introduced a number of themes that deal with the various issues of the time that the book was set, such as the relocation of the native indians and the struggles of the civil war. It has a gritty realism that is usually absent from most books of this genre.

What did I like?
The main attraction of the book for me was the way that Carter placed the novel around real life events. Many of the supporting characters in the book are actual representations of real life figures and Carter certainly has the ability to draw you into the story. The action when it comes is fast and furious, and anyone who enjoys the occasional gunfight (and who doesn’t?) will find plenty to keep them entertained here.

What didn’t I like?
The story at times seemed to drag. There were a number of paragraphs that contained, at least to my mind, a lot of excess information. This really caused me to struggle to keep up with the storyline and at times I felt as if I was just drifting through the book without really taking anything in. My only other bugbear was the use of dialect when the characters speak. I enjoy reading a novel without having to try and decipher what people are saying.

Would I recommend?
To fans of westerns then this has to be a part of your collection, especially if you have already seen the film. There was also a sequel written called ‘The Vengeance Trail of Josey Wales’, but I don’t think I enjoyed the first novel enough to seek it out.

Entertaining review of Gone to Texas.

Thanks, been neglecting this lately got a few to catch up on :)

Journey to Hell - Donald Macneil ****

Although I have never been a fan of autobiographies, I have always had a bit of an interest in real life tales of hardship or endurance. Over the years I have read many prisoner of war and escape books, so decided to try a more modern twist and read about some of the drug dealers that have been imprisoned abroad.

What is it about?
In a nutshell : A man a little down on his luck falls in with some ‘bad’ guys after they invite him to teach them to sail their new yacht. A plan is concocted that involves an attempt to smuggle drugs half way around the world. The three of them set off on the trip, become captured along with their cargo and must face the consequences. Donald is found guilty at trial and is sentenced to a long jail term in a foreign prison. The prison he ends up is very different to his expectations and what we would consider human rights are not even remotely acknowledged. Donald describes the happenings of the underworld prison system, the attitude of the authorities and the difficulties faced in dealing with a very unique judicial system.

What did I like?
There wasn’t too much detail to get bogged down in and the majority of the events are laid out in a very straight forward manner. The authors writing skills are really quite good and pages fly by, you can tell this is an intelligent man and he doesn’t seem to pad out any of the actual events for added effect. I think you can trust him that the main dealings during his stay in prison really happened as he says they did, which is a must for these books to hold any credibility. The violent parts are described with fairly graphic detail and not a lot is left to the imagination, there is nothing worse than a book with the juicy parts left to the reader’s imagination.

What didn’t I like?
Firstly I just wish the author would have taken a lot more responsibility for his actions. As I have said previously, he comes across as a very intelligent person, and whilst I understand that we all experience weakness at times I find it extremely hard to believe that he was hooked into the deal as naively as he would have us believe. Here is a man that has a vast amount of real life experience attempting to explain his way out of being a drug runner by simply advising that he feared for his safety, and this is even before they have put together any concrete plans. At times it did start to sound a little bit too much of a sob story and I would have preferred it if he had just come out, and said something along the lines of ‘I was skint, drugs sounded an easy way to make money so I tried my luck’. There is also the possibility that he takes too much credit for any changes that are made for the better for the prisoners, but of course I wasn’t there so it is hard to say just how influential he really was in instigating reform.

Would I recommend?
I would, but as I have only read two books from this category (The other being ‘In the Shadow of Papillon) it is difficult to advise whether or not this is one of the better ‘foreign imprisonment’ offerings or not, but I have to say that I enjoyed it and that you may as well give it a go.

Three Men in a Boat - Jerome K Jerome **

I was given this book by a friend as they had tried to read it but struggled to finish. It’s always been one of those books I meant to read and it has been sat on my list of novels to tick off for a number or years. Published in 1889, I expected the language to be a bit dated but thought that it must have something going for it to have stood the last 125 years and still be in print. Supposedly Jerome started writing this novel as a travel guide but it turned into a ‘humorous novel’ somewhere along the way.

What is it about?

Basically the title is exactly what we find between the covers, three friends (and a dog) for no particular reason other than ‘overwork’, make a decision to hire a boat and go for a trip upon the Thames. The prose contains descriptions of their surroundings and events, alternating with numerous anecdotes about the writer’s experiences and thoughts on the world around him.

What did I like?

Tricky one... I suppose that the novel allows the reader a glimpse into the time of when it was written, although it could hardly be called a ‘rounded’ view. The characters are very much like the character ‘Bertie Wooster’, a bit lazy, thick and spoilt, and I doubt the majority of the population thought too much about how difficult bagpipes are to learn. At times the comedy elements struck a note with me, such as the hopelessness of the putting up of the tent (who hasn’t been in that situation?). The other credit I can give Jerome is that when he wants to he can actually write really beautiful prose:
"And the red sunset threw a mystic light upon the waters, and tinged with fire the towering woods, and made a golden glory of the piled up clouds. It was an hour of deep enchantment, of ecstatic hope and longing."

What didn’t I like?

I know I am in the minority here, but, well, most of it. I found the characters boring and annoying, the plot tedious and the multiple tangents the author takes pointless and adding nothing to the overall tale. I’m all for breaking up a plot. I decided to read the book as primarily a comedy, and have read other books from the same period that have hit the spot, this unfortunately didn’t. At the beginning of each chapter there are several bullet points detailing what is going to be covered (why these are there I don’t know) and I could have honestly read only these and given the book the same score.

Would I recommend?

Not really, and only if you are looking for a piece of work that can act as a social commentary for the late Edwardian period. I have read the multiple reviews on Amazon where people state that they have cried with laughter whilst reading Three Men and a Boat, and it was recently voted the second best comedy novel of all time, so the fault is likely with me. Where others have had to put the book aside from being overcome with humour, I have put aside to stop myself from throwing it in the bin.

No Man's Land - Barry England ***

Barry England only ever had two novels published during his lifetime, the first being ‘Figures in a Landscape’ and some 27 years later ‘No Man’s Land’. His first novel narrowly missed out on the booker prize so I am unsure why he left it so long between novels.

What is it about?

It follows John Savage, a mercenary that lives with a band of survivors on the outskirts of civilisation. There has been a cataclysmic event that has devastated the country, man must live by his wits and treat all strangers as potential enemies, including the army. Unwillingly leading his motley crew he must choose the safest path possible while keeping the death count low.

What did I like?

The basic story is one of redemption, the finding of a spark of humanity in a world that appears devoid of goodwill. Barry manages to capture the desolation experienced by the characters really well and the action when it comes wouldn’t be amiss in a James Bond Novel.

What didn’t I like?

For me the novel fell down because I felt that Barry was never really sure of the type of book he wished to write. The language used was far too unconventional for your typical action book, and at times slowed up the pace of the story when all you really wanted to do was rattle through to the next scene. It was almost as if he was trying to make up for his first novel not winning the booker prize by placing as many obscure words as he knew and hoping someone would recognise this as having literary merit. The word ‘said’ after practically every speech became a little annoying, as did the at times confusing plot.

Would I recommend?

Oddly enough, I suppose I would, although not as an introduction to the author (seems strange to say that with only two novels), but as a follow up to his earlier book. It would be a shame if you enjoyed Figures in a Landscape to not read his entire collection.

The Return of Reginald Perrin - David Nobbs *****

The brilliant sequel to Nobbs earlier book ‘The Fall and Rise of Reginald Perrin’. Many people will have seen the TV series which remained fairly consistent with the books

What is it about?

It continues the story of one Reginald Iolanthe Perrin and his ever deepening descent into a midlife crisis. Unhappy with his life he decides to open a shop that sells useless products, but is amazed when it becomes a success. How will he deal with once again being trapped in the repetition of the daily rat race?

What did I like?

Nobbs is a brilliant writer, very rarely do I venture in the comedy shelves but he has totally changed my perception of the genre. The book is filled with warmth, witty anecdotes, memorable catchphrases and characters you actually care about. It is easy to place yourself into any of the characters shoes and recognise your own misgivings and traits. I defy anyone approaching their middle years to read this and not have to chuckle to themselves as they identity thoughts they are currently experiencing. It is not all that often you will find me laugh out loud reading a book, but I am glad to say that on more than a few occasions this happened.

What didn’t I like?

There wasn’t really anything. If I had to be picky I would say that at times it did seem a little dated to our modern world, but you can hardly blame Nobbs for that.

Would I recommend?

Definitely, although not necessarily as a standalone novel, a lot of the storylines are a continuation of the previous book, so read that first.

Iceberg - Clive Cussler ****

Dirk Pitts third adventure under the watchful eye of Clive Cussler. Anyone who has read the previous Pitt novels will know exactly what to expect from what can only be described as a boys own adventure. Take an empty box, throw in an improbable plot, fairly sexist and macho main character, plenty of explosions and just for good measure exotic locations, shake it up a bit and empty, Iceberg would be the resultant concoction.

What is it about?

This finds him investigating a ship that is embedded in the middle of an iceberg in the North Atlantic. However things are not as they seem and when an attempt is made on his life, Dirk must dig deeper into the layers of double agents and subterfuge to find the truth.

What did I like?

Jack Higgins is my favourite action author, and Clive Cussler seems a natural progression. Now and again we all need a book where the action speeds along and drags the reader with them. Iceberg is just that type of novel. The author is not afraid to over exaggerate things and this gives the reader the sense of escapism that they are looking for.

What didn’t I like?

Although I know the plot is never going to be watertight in these types of novels, there were one or two holes in this one that made me think twice, also the reliance merely on gut instinct to catch the bad guys was worn a little thin.

Would I recommend?

Of course I would, but only to people that promise not to get offended by books that were written mainly for men. Books that contain more than a fair share of sexism (If you thought Bond was bad then you haven’t seen Pitt), and occasionally a hint of homophobia, although never in a malicious way.

an improbable plot, fairly sexist and macho main character, plenty of explosions and just for good measure exotic locations
True, but they're still lots of fun. Alister MacLean is my favorite, though. His books often tended to have some nice biting wit, in addition to the rest. They're super fast and super fun, despite any flaws! :)

I agree Monkey, I have read a few Alistair Mclean and enjoyed them, also Hammond Innes but his are a little more realistic :)

I have read the first 3 Cussler books, and over the xmas hols raided all the second hand book stores and now have them all.

King Rat - James Clavell *****

This is the first novel by Clavell that I have read. When I picked it up I didn’t realise that it was part of a group of six books he published called the ‘Asian Saga’. Although it was the first written, if placed in chronological order it is actually the fourth in the series. However, I don’t think there is any tenuous link that means it has to be slotted into the order of reading at a certain point. King Rat was written in 1962 but set towards the latter end of WWII, and is based upon a number of the authors own experiences.

What is it about?

The story is set in the Pacific, and focuses on a group of allied prisoners currently imprisoned in a Japanese camp called Changi. The harsh and intolerable conditions meant that only 1 man in 15 had the strength to make it through to see peacetime. As with normal everyday life the social structure of the camp makes up the bulk of the plot, where the human condition is such that many will do anything they can to survive, and some even make a living out of it. King Rat is an American soldier who doesn’t conform to normal camp standards, he is always immaculately dressed, has plenty of food and a small army of followers. How long can he maintain this way of life? With Jealousy rife and the camp guards always on the lookout it can only be a matter of time before the King becomes a peasant.

What did I like?

The descriptions of camp life are second to none; it’s hard to believe sometimes that this is a work of fiction. You feel the prisoners pain as yet another dose of dysentery racks their already emaciated bodies. You experience the British officer’s resentment as they are reduced to wearing rags while their subordinates have clean pressed clothes. You wince at the brutality of the guards as punishment is dished out again and again. Clavell is a writer that is not afraid to pull any punches and I respect him for that.

What didn’t I like?

There really wasn’t anything to criticise. This is one of the best books I’ve read for a long time

Would I recommend?

I can’t speak for any other of Clavell’s books, but I can certainly recommend this one. I can’t wait to try some more of his.

>102 Bridgey: I had mixed feelings about Three Men in a Boat too. I found it moderately entertaining and moderately charming.

Ian Fleming and James Bond - Ben Macintyre ****

I have always been a fan of the James Bond books, and fancied reading something about the author and the reasons behind his creation. I didn’t want War and Peace, just a general overview of Fleming’s life and those that surrounded him. I have read a few books by Macintyre before so thought I would give it a try.

What is it about?

Basically it cover’s Flemings life, skimming over his childhood and naval career until we reach the introduction of the world’s most famous secret agent, James Bond. Macintyre showcases the similarities between the creator and his creation and gives reasons why he thinks these have been included. He also studies the other aspects that make up a bond novel (baddies/girls/gadgets) and offers potential real life counterparts that may have been the influence behind them.

What did I like?

Macintyre has obviously well researched his subject, and written in a clear and interesting way. It was something for someone that wants to know a little about a lot, rather than any great detail. There were also a number of interesting photographs included.

What didn’t I like?

When you get down to the nitty gritty, we will never know the real people that Fleming based his characters on, and each person seems to have multiple possibilities. Because of this it did tend to run a little like a telephone directory and fell in to the trap of ‘it could have been her or her or her...’

Would I recommend?

Yes, for anyone with an interest in the man behind the licence to kill then give it a try.

>109 rebeccanyc: I can see why some people would enjoy it. I just couldn't cope with the ramblings. :)

>111 Bridgey: As I recall, the ramblings were something I enjoyed!

The Spy Who Came in from the Cold - John Le Carre ****

LeCarre has always been one of those authors that I meant to try but never got around to it, I was aware that a lot of his books have been turned into films but The Spy Who Came in From the Cold was one that I had never seen. At around 250 pages it seemed short enough as a taster to the author.

What is it about?

Set during the cold war we follow the British spy Alex Leamus, he is coming to the end of his career and is asked by ‘Control’ to complete one last mission. He is to defect to the other side and instigate a series of planned events. However things don’t go exactly as he imagined. A story of how human relationships are made or broken and contrasted with a sense of duty, we follow the age old struggle of loyalty to yourself and those around us.

What did I like?

The writing flows along very nicely, you are allowed to become drawn into characters personal lives and you actually begin to care about their safety. The detail he puts into the story is clinical, there is never too much or too little, he seems to judge it just right, this is particularly impressive when you consider the twists and turns throughout the plot. It leaves you wanting to flick a few chapters back and see if there are any additional clues you may have missed. You get the impression that this is an author that pores over his books many times before he releases them for the publisher, and because he cares, you care also.

What didn’t I like?

This is just my personal opinion, but for me there just wasn’t enough action in the book. I didn’t expect tons of gun fights or people jumping from aeroplanes, but I did expect something a little more to happen. It was one of those books that I found I could put down and pick up again in a day or two and not really have any kind of yearning to pick it up.

Would I recommend?

I would. But I am unsure why. I did enjoy the book, but as I have said it didn’t really grip me enough as I was working my way through it. Strangely though, once I had finished I did think back over the events more than I normally would and even went and reread the final chapter again. I think it is one of those novels that will stay with me for a long time, although I am unsure if I will pick up another of his books. Also I think this is probably a far truer reflection of the actual goings on during the Cold War than other authors seem to offer.

Here is next years link

http://www.librarything.com/topic/210670