Ce sujet est actuellement indiqué comme "en sommeil"—le dernier message date de plus de 90 jours. Vous pouvez le réveiller en postant une réponse.
1lilisin
Those who have followed my threads (particularly the Club Read 2011 thread) will remember my great praise for Endo's Sea and Poison. His writing style, for one, and his uncomfortable plot about Japanese doctor's performing vivisections on American soldiers. His take on right or wrong morality in the face of potential medical progress was fascinating as was his focus on the concept of rank and talking out in Japanese society.
When I Whistle takes on a similar role and is similarly fascinating.
Dr. Ozu is a doctor ready to do whatever it takes to get ahead in the medical world. He is quick to follow his superviser's orders and will never question a doctor of higher rank if he thinks it'll put him under a weary eye. Despite knowing that a better treatment could be at hand. He is manipulative of his peers and will downplay others to cast a "good" light on himself. His scheming brang out disgust as I read on.
But the book isn't actually about Dr. Ozu, but instead about Dr. Ozu's father, Ozu. (Distinction between Dr. Ozu and Ozu is important hence the "Dr." notation.) The book focuses on Ozu and his relationship with a childhood friend named Flatfish as they grow up during military time. Unlike his son, Ozu was a poor student growing up and didn't care about making it in life, and his friend Flatfish wasn't any better. But the two of them were able to form this friendship that helped better themselves in a better way. Flatfish's affections for this one girl and how he continues to prize his memories of her is amazing and something that is truly lost in this world.
This discrepancy between Ozu's world and Dr. Ozu's world is quite jarring but it's what makes the book so lovely and thus highly recommended. If only I hadn't waited so long to write a review; it might have come out a little better. In any case, this is a wonderful "sequel" to Sea and Poison.
When I Whistle takes on a similar role and is similarly fascinating.
Dr. Ozu is a doctor ready to do whatever it takes to get ahead in the medical world. He is quick to follow his superviser's orders and will never question a doctor of higher rank if he thinks it'll put him under a weary eye. Despite knowing that a better treatment could be at hand. He is manipulative of his peers and will downplay others to cast a "good" light on himself. His scheming brang out disgust as I read on.
But the book isn't actually about Dr. Ozu, but instead about Dr. Ozu's father, Ozu. (Distinction between Dr. Ozu and Ozu is important hence the "Dr." notation.) The book focuses on Ozu and his relationship with a childhood friend named Flatfish as they grow up during military time. Unlike his son, Ozu was a poor student growing up and didn't care about making it in life, and his friend Flatfish wasn't any better. But the two of them were able to form this friendship that helped better themselves in a better way. Flatfish's affections for this one girl and how he continues to prize his memories of her is amazing and something that is truly lost in this world.
This discrepancy between Ozu's world and Dr. Ozu's world is quite jarring but it's what makes the book so lovely and thus highly recommended. If only I hadn't waited so long to write a review; it might have come out a little better. In any case, this is a wonderful "sequel" to Sea and Poison.
2kidzdoc
Nice review, lilisin. I have this title, and I've read (and enjoyed) The Sea and Poison, so I'll probably read When I Whistle in the next month or two.
3lilisin
I wanted to add something about this book as I see around LT that people are preparing to read this.
In my version of the book -- which I believe is the only version of the English translation -- there is an introduction by Shusaku Endo himself. In it, he discusses his battle with a lung disease that ended up hospitalizing him three years. He was bed-ridden for a year apparently before writing The Sea and Poison (1957) and was then hospitalized for another three years before writing When I Whistle much in the future (1974). I was wondering with this biography if this stint in the hospital and his battle with his disease has led him to be more sensitive towards the patients when comparing these two books.
And I was curious to see if those of you who have also read The Sea and Poison first have noticed any softness on Endo's part for I feel I have.
In my version of the book -- which I believe is the only version of the English translation -- there is an introduction by Shusaku Endo himself. In it, he discusses his battle with a lung disease that ended up hospitalizing him three years. He was bed-ridden for a year apparently before writing The Sea and Poison (1957) and was then hospitalized for another three years before writing When I Whistle much in the future (1974). I was wondering with this biography if this stint in the hospital and his battle with his disease has led him to be more sensitive towards the patients when comparing these two books.
And I was curious to see if those of you who have also read The Sea and Poison first have noticed any softness on Endo's part for I feel I have.
4rebeccanyc
I haven't read When I Whistle (yet), but I definitely noticed compassion for the patients (and they were tuberculosis patients for the most part) in The Sea and Poison.
5rebeccanyc
Here is my review.
This novel was easier to read than most of the other works by Endō that I've read, and was extremely moving, perhaps more so for me than the more overtly religiously themed novels. Nonetheless, it deals with the issue that should be at the heart of any religion -- how we treat each other.
The novel contrasts a father and a son, in more or less alternating chapters. As the story begins, a chance encounter with a former schoolmate on a train reminds middle-aged Ozu, the father, of his years in semi-rural Nada Middle School (which was really what we would call a high school) just before World War II began, and in particular of a strange boy who became his best friend, nicknamed Flatfish. This part of the novel then consists of Ozu and Flatfish's experiences in school, where they were in a class for less motivated students, continuing after their graduation when Ozu goes to college and Flatfish to work, and then into the years when both are drafted into the Japanese army. At the same time, Flatfish becomes enamored of a girl he cannot bring himself to talk to, Aiko. He yearns to impress her, and remains touchingly devoted to her, from afar, after he moves away and goes to war. He even entrusts Ozu with a mission to bring her money when he learns that she is married and pregnant. The story of the lifelong friendship between these two boys and then young men not only captures a time in Japanese history but also vividly depicts the values of friendship and loyalty.
Contrasted with this is the story of Ozu's son, Eiichi, a doctor at a hospital (called a dispensary) in presumably 1970s Tokyo. Although Eiichi still lives with his family, he stays away from home as much as possible. He is eager to get ahead at all costs, schemes constantly, uses people to meet his own needs, and resents his father for not being ambitious and successful and helping him out, as the father of one of his colleagues has done. He doesn't hesitate to follow the orders and perceived wishes of his superiors, who have ulterior financial and professional motives, even when these clearly interfere with the needs of the patients. In fact, he doesn't care about the patients at all, and belittles and plots against a doctor who does; he cares only about his own success. I must say I found him an extremely unpleasant character.
In the end, the two strands of the novel intersect in what is perhaps a difficult-to-believe plot point. Nonetheless, I found this a lovely novel. Like The Sea and Poison, it deals with medical ethics, but not in nearly so horrific a way. More importantly, it illustrates what Endō may have believed were lost values: respect and love for our fellow human beings.
This novel was easier to read than most of the other works by Endō that I've read, and was extremely moving, perhaps more so for me than the more overtly religiously themed novels. Nonetheless, it deals with the issue that should be at the heart of any religion -- how we treat each other.
The novel contrasts a father and a son, in more or less alternating chapters. As the story begins, a chance encounter with a former schoolmate on a train reminds middle-aged Ozu, the father, of his years in semi-rural Nada Middle School (which was really what we would call a high school) just before World War II began, and in particular of a strange boy who became his best friend, nicknamed Flatfish. This part of the novel then consists of Ozu and Flatfish's experiences in school, where they were in a class for less motivated students, continuing after their graduation when Ozu goes to college and Flatfish to work, and then into the years when both are drafted into the Japanese army. At the same time, Flatfish becomes enamored of a girl he cannot bring himself to talk to, Aiko. He yearns to impress her, and remains touchingly devoted to her, from afar, after he moves away and goes to war. He even entrusts Ozu with a mission to bring her money when he learns that she is married and pregnant. The story of the lifelong friendship between these two boys and then young men not only captures a time in Japanese history but also vividly depicts the values of friendship and loyalty.
Contrasted with this is the story of Ozu's son, Eiichi, a doctor at a hospital (called a dispensary) in presumably 1970s Tokyo. Although Eiichi still lives with his family, he stays away from home as much as possible. He is eager to get ahead at all costs, schemes constantly, uses people to meet his own needs, and resents his father for not being ambitious and successful and helping him out, as the father of one of his colleagues has done. He doesn't hesitate to follow the orders and perceived wishes of his superiors, who have ulterior financial and professional motives, even when these clearly interfere with the needs of the patients. In fact, he doesn't care about the patients at all, and belittles and plots against a doctor who does; he cares only about his own success. I must say I found him an extremely unpleasant character.
In the end, the two strands of the novel intersect in what is perhaps a difficult-to-believe plot point. Nonetheless, I found this a lovely novel. Like The Sea and Poison, it deals with medical ethics, but not in nearly so horrific a way. More importantly, it illustrates what Endō may have believed were lost values: respect and love for our fellow human beings.
