Ce sujet est actuellement indiqué comme "en sommeil"—le dernier message date de plus de 90 jours. Vous pouvez le réveiller en postant une réponse.
1GirlMisanthrope
Any tags you've decided to stop using? Have you gone in and modified each book under that tag?
As the way I access my library changes, I will sometimes delete tags. I also try to make my library visitor-friendly with my tagging. Folly, I know, considering how subjective it all is.
I used to have some books tagged by their series (for example, Harry Potter books) but now that LT shows a link to the series for each book, I am going back in and removing those.
As the way I access my library changes, I will sometimes delete tags. I also try to make my library visitor-friendly with my tagging. Folly, I know, considering how subjective it all is.
I used to have some books tagged by their series (for example, Harry Potter books) but now that LT shows a link to the series for each book, I am going back in and removing those.
2reading_fox
I've kept my series tags, becasue the series CK column isn't sortable, and the tags column is.
I know some of my tags fall out of favour, but I keep them anyway because that's what I felt about the book at the time I read it, even if I use a different phrase now. I will sometimes edit similar meanings together.
I know some of my tags fall out of favour, but I keep them anyway because that's what I felt about the book at the time I read it, even if I use a different phrase now. I will sometimes edit similar meanings together.
3keristars
Dunno if it's what you mean, but I used to use a category of tag like "historical:1850s" to mean "the period of history in which this book is set is 1850-1859" but recently, it started to feel weird to use a "historical" label for books that were written with a contemporary setting in, say, 1852, or likewise for something written/set in 1984. So I switched it to "setting:1850s" or the like.
I'd also been uncomfortable with tags like "American classic" or "British literature", which were mainly terms I'd learned from my lit classes in school. A while ago, I decided to go with "American poetry" or "British fiction" or whatever instead, but it still didn't feel right. So a month or so ago, I started converting those tags to "origin:place". I'm still not entirely sure about the wording, but it'll be easy to convert them again in the future (not that I've finished the process yet - I keep getting distracted in the middle of things).
I'd also been uncomfortable with tags like "American classic" or "British literature", which were mainly terms I'd learned from my lit classes in school. A while ago, I decided to go with "American poetry" or "British fiction" or whatever instead, but it still didn't feel right. So a month or so ago, I started converting those tags to "origin:place". I'm still not entirely sure about the wording, but it'll be easy to convert them again in the future (not that I've finished the process yet - I keep getting distracted in the middle of things).
4SimonW11
I have tags that duplicate other data Since Tag mash allows you to search for more than one thing.
I
I
5vpfluke
Usually, if I decide that I have a better tag for a book, I put the new one in and keep the old one, unless the old one is misleading.
With all the tag combinations I've voted on, I am now seeing greater usefulness for multiple word tags, where I used to think tagmashes were satisfactory. A particularly good example would where for a city like Springfield, you would want the tag itself to be more complete by putting in 'Springfield Mass', or 'Springfield IL', rather than depending on 'Springfield' and a 'state name'. I might leave both versions in to allow for tagmashes to work.
With all the tag combinations I've voted on, I am now seeing greater usefulness for multiple word tags, where I used to think tagmashes were satisfactory. A particularly good example would where for a city like Springfield, you would want the tag itself to be more complete by putting in 'Springfield Mass', or 'Springfield IL', rather than depending on 'Springfield' and a 'state name'. I might leave both versions in to allow for tagmashes to work.
7GirlMisanthrope
Keristars,
Yup, sounds like me. I'm a bit obsessed with what I consider ideal and change my mind over the years.
Yup, sounds like me. I'm a bit obsessed with what I consider ideal and change my mind over the years.