Favorite Science Fiction by Women Authors

Description
List of the Month: March 2021 Add works of science fiction by women authors. Please only thumb down if a book does not meet the requirements of the list (i.e. not science fiction and/or not by a woman). Updated to Favorite to provide a better framework for selection.
14
6,119 membres
224 critiques
4.1
Rang global 32
16
2,792 membres
168 critiques
½ 4.3
Rang global 37
17
1,582 membres
114 critiques
3.9
Rang global 40
17 Members
bkhl, andyl, Aquila, rosalita, anglemark, monkity, jain, Ennas, ejmam, sturlington, hoddybook, Maddz, gypsysmom, JackMello, timetunnel, skaplanolmsted, Deborama,
Explications
Aquila: I think of them as more science fiction than fantasy, especially if they fork from one small change.
rosalita: I don't think of alternative history books like Farthing to be science fiction, but that might just be me.
anglemark: Alternate history has long been classified by scholars as science fiction.
ejmam: Alternate history is SF, especially if it isn't alternate because magic
18
2,049 membres
130 critiques
3.9
Rang global 44
19
2,376 membres
48 critiques
4
Rang global 36
20
3,721 membres
169 critiques
½ 4.3
Rang global 51
21
2,959 membres
180 critiques
4.1
Rang global 46
22
3,263 membres
196 critiques
4.2
Rang global 47
23
2,058 membres
148 critiques
3.8
Rang global 56
24
2,450 membres
173 critiques
½ 4.4
Rang global 48
25
7,274 membres
362 critiques
3.9
Rang global 58
26
1,590 membres
118 critiques
4.1
Rang global 83
27
39,447 membres
1,271 critiques
4.1
Rang global 60
19 Members
anglemark, Herenya, BookDoc16, mooingzelda, charl08, sarahemmm, PaperbackPirate, sturlington, hoddybook, IrishSue, gypsysmom, al.vick, JackMello, Peace2, ReaderSally, Superenigmatix, JAlison.Stirling, quondame, Julie_in_the_Library,lorax ,Quaisior , ,susanbooks ,zmeischa , ,TamaraMerrill
Explications
lorax : Not science fiction. Mainstream fiction with some SF trappings.
sarahemmm: My opinion is that all SF is 'mainstream with SF trappings'. It is interesting on the confusion caused by unexpected TT.
sturlington: I don't consider this book to be science fiction.
: Not SF
28
3,527 membres
153 critiques
3.9
Rang global 77
29
439 membres
24 critiques
3.9
Rang global 102
30
2,124 membres
119 critiques
4.1
Rang global 110
31
1,512 membres
39 critiques
½ 3.5
Rang global 115
32
1,586 membres
37 critiques
½ 3.6
Rang global 107
33
2,585 membres
150 critiques
½ 3.4
Rang global 104
34
1,326 membres
29 critiques
½ 3.7
Rang global 91
35
3,037 membres
177 critiques
4
Rang global 126
36
200 membres
5 critiques
½ 3.5
Rang global 142
37
396 membres
5 critiques
½ 4.4
Rang global 164
38
884 membres
11 critiques
4
Rang global 193
39
2,595 membres
165 critiques
½ 4.3
Rang global 170
40
13 membres
Rang global 241
41
134 membres
3 critiques
4
Rang global 242
42
781 membres
12 critiques
½ 3.5
Rang global 303
43
2,830 membres
83 critiques
4.1
Rang global 235
44
1,922 membres
122 critiques
4.2
Rang global 352
45
575 membres
39 critiques
½ 4.3
Rang global 471
2 Members
SChant, JackMello
46
15,914 membres
370 critiques
4
Rang global 728
7 Members
rosalita, jannon, waltzmn, TopFiveBooks, JackMello, ReaderSally, allyrod113,andyl ,Aquila ,tardis ,Quaisior ,anglemark ,jain ,ejmam , ,RoboSchro ,amanda4242 ,CarltonC ,merrystar ,sturlington ,Maddz ,zmeischa ,gypsysmom , ,SChant
Explications
andyl : This is fantasy for me
Aquila : Yeah, this is pretty classic fantasy, unless you want to put all systematic magic into scifi.
anglemark : Books don't really get to be more fantasy than this.
ejmam : Definitely fantasy
amanda4242 : This is a fantasy novel that is on several existing lists of fantasy novels.
Maddz : Fantasy not SF
waltzmn: Yes, it's fantasy, but if it's on the "Science Fiction" list, I put it on MY favorites list because it's one of the three or four best fantasy series of all time. We need a way to vote it to a fantasy list that doesn't imply it's a bad book!
: This is fantasy, not SF
SChant : Fantasy