Worst religious books

Description
Worst books that purport to be revealed scripture, holy, etc. Which do you think is worse reading -- the Koran or the Bible or the Book of Mormon? Which do you think is more awful in its ethics? Have fun deciding.
1
100 membres
1 critique
2.8
3 Members
lquilter, inkcrow, waltzmn,
2
7,249 membres
90 critiques
3.2
3 Members
lquilter, aulsmith, waltzmn, ,
Explications
aulsmith: Very tedious
waltzmn: The Bible (both Hebrew and Greek portions) are written in the contemporary language of their people -- that is, contemporary Hebrew and Greek. If Joseph Smith was granted divine inspiration, why didn't God tell him to drop the fake King James English?
: I do see problems with its language and origins, but it also holds great value as a vehicle for inspiration. Some of its teachings are unfortunate, but others can be sublime and profound. In other words, it's a lot like many prized religious texts that wouldn't make the "Worst" list.
3
39 membres
1 critique
½ 1.5
2 Members
lquilter, inkcrow
4
22,394 membres
396 critiques
½ 3.7
5
309 membres
2 critiques
½ 3.7
Member
thorold
Explications
thorold: Isherwood is great. But not when he's in full guru-adoring mode
7
1,009 membres
11 critiques
4
2 Members
aulsmith, inkcrow,
Explications
aulsmith: Completely revolting ethics.
8
41 membres
2 critiques
3
Member
inkcrow
9
530 membres
10 critiques
½ 3.7
Member
lquilter
10
610 membres
5 critiques
½ 4.3
Member
aulsmith
Explications
aulsmith: Dull
11
50 membres
1 critique
0.8
Member
lquilter
12
164 membres
1 critique
½ 3.4
Member
aulsmith
Explications
aulsmith: Really dull and not very forthcoming if you don't know what adultery or the power of the keys is already.
13
672 membres
15 critiques
3.8
2 Members
lquilter, aulsmith, ,waltzmn ,
Explications
aulsmith: Repetitive, misogynist, dull and ethically questionable.
waltzmn : It is unfair to judge the Quran by English translations; although the Arabic is said to be brilliantly written, I have yet to see an English translation that is anything but wooden (usually so literal as to be meaningless). But I don't read Arabic. I will not condemn a book I cannot read.
14
498 membres
19 critiques
3.8
3 Members
lquilter, aulsmith, waltzmn, ,thorold , , ,
Explications
thorold : It might be a bad translation technically, but it's had a huge and generally positive influence on English literature
aulsmith: Bible in general: Too long, contradictory, misogynist and ethically queestionable. KJV: translation made from bad original sources
waltzmn: Without discussing the merits of the Bible as a religious work, the King James Translation is very poor as a translation (although an excellent piece of prose). The translators' Hebrew was poor, and although their Greek was better, they were translating an incredibly corrupt Greek text. Time to put the King James translation on the shelf as a literary monument and study a translation that is competent.
15
13,884 membres
112 critiques
4
Member
aulsmith,lquilter , ,thorold ,
Explications
aulsmith: Except for the part about Satan, it's dull.
16
17,459 membres
171 critiques
½ 3.7
Member
aulsmith, , ,thorold , ,
Explications
aulsmith: Dull and didactic.
17
18,491 membres
217 critiques
4.2
Explications
aulsmith : Short, snappy, a little obscure, but then it's not telling you stuff you can't find out by just living your life.