2016 Hugo Eligible Novels

Description
This list contains novels eligible for the 2016 Hugo Award for Best Novel. Generally these are science fiction and fantasy stories of 40,000 words or more published in 2015. A full description of the eligibility requirements is here.
1
6,398 membres
389 critiques
4.1
12 Members
Vierran, Awfki, Rtrace, Scorbet, TimSharrock, majkia, lkmiller, KimarieBee, mathgirl40, souloftherose, gypsysmom, Settings,jain
Explications
mathgirl40: Very well written. A fairy tale with unexpected twists. Definitely a Hugo contender.
2
2,515 membres
131 critiques
4.2
3
4,819 membres
251 critiques
3.9
4
2,923 membres
249 critiques
4
7 Members
Vierran, majkia, GreenVelvet, amysisson, rhian_of_oz, mkbird, kara.shamy
Explications
GreenVelvet: One of the most original fantasy/reality merges I've ever read. Utterly unique. I can't stop thinking about it.
5
726 membres
52 critiques
3.8
6
1,035 membres
76 critiques
3.8
7 Members
psybre, AsYouKnow_Bob, Scorbet, majkia, aulsmith, mathgirl40, gypsysmom
Explications
aulsmith: A tour-de-force of speculative fiction, but I suspect folks with no background in Plato or Socratics might be a bit lost.
7
7,959 membres
362 critiques
4.2
8
619 membres
50 critiques
½ 3.7
5 Members
TimSharrock, mkbird, AnnieMod, mathgirl40, souloftherose
Explications
mathgirl40: This book was a real page-turner, with an interesting premise and lovely writing.
9
746 membres
55 critiques
½ 3.4
10
355 membres
25 critiques
4.1
5 Members
Lirleni, jain, mkbird, merrystar, mathgirl40
Explications
mathgirl40: A nice retelling of the Beauty and the Beast story, with unexpected twists.
11
1,857 membres
72 critiques
½ 3.6
12
1,271 membres
43 critiques
3.8
5 Members
Awfki, Rtrace, Scorbet, majkia, tottman
Explications
Awfki: I was really surprised he was able to wrap this up in a reasonable way. The book is typically Scalzi, fast paced, humorous (if you like snark and sarcasm) and generally a light read. My main complaint with this series is that the aliens don't feel at all alien. They speak with the same snark and sarcasm as the humans and that just feels off. It's still a fun read, just don't take it too seriously Also, I hesitate to call a popcorn read the "best" SF/F novel of the year. If a popcorn read is the best year had to offer it seems like it must have been a pretty off year.
tottman: Another great entry in the series. Well-written characters, thoughtful politics and plotting.
13
583 membres
37 critiques
½ 3.7
14
1,901 membres
91 critiques
½ 3.7
15
1,714 membres
106 critiques
3.8
16
881 membres
41 critiques
3.8
17
728 membres
32 critiques
3.8
18
200 membres
19 critiques
2.9
19
509 membres
27 critiques
½ 3.5
3 Members
majkia, rhian_of_oz, tottman
Explications
tottman: Creative plot and world building. Solid and interesting characters. Definitely worthy of Hugo consideration
20
69 membres
2 critiques
3.8
3 Members
karenb, asfi235, majkia
21
2,679 membres
116 critiques
4.2
22
877 membres
59 critiques
½ 3.7
3 Members
karenb, Vierran, majkia
23
1,063 membres
45 critiques
½ 3.6
3 Members
andyl, majkia, Settings
Explications
andyl: Extended eligibility - UK edition 2014, US edition 2015
Settings: This is eligable? If so, it's my favorite so far.
24
931 membres
44 critiques
½ 3.6
3 Members
andyl, karenb, jain
Explications
andyl: UK published in 2014 but extended eligibility (publ. in USA 2015)
25
591 membres
30 critiques
½ 3.7
3 Members
karenb, Vierran, Rtrace
26
1,721 membres
106 critiques
½ 3.7
27
727 membres
36 critiques
4
3 Members
Scorbet, majkia, mkbird
28
1,803 membres
94 critiques
3.8
29
5,134 membres
259 critiques
½ 3.6
2 Members
Rtrace, AnnieMod
30
2,107 membres
96 critiques
4
2 Members
Awfki, souloftherose
Explications
Awfki: It feels very fresh and original. It's a blend of elements strung together in new and interesting ways and a well told story with likable characters and a dash of humor. Butcher is obviously the servant of several cats because knows exactly what is going on in their evil little heads. Also, this is a much, MUCH better selection for him than the puppy-slated Dresden novel of last year. The Dresden stuff is good but it got old for me after book four or five. This is a totally different feel and much better than than any of the Dresden novels.
31
1,337 membres
68 critiques
½ 3.5
32
244 membres
24 critiques
½ 3.7
2 Members
andyl, Lirleni
Explications
Lirleni: has an interesting base for 'mancy (magic). Basically, a 'mancer has become so obsessed with it, that they can use their obsession to change reality, with a price.
33
303 membres
15 critiques
½ 3.5
3 Members
karenb, majkia, mathgirl40
Explications
mathgirl40: Not my favourite of Wilson's books, but well-written with good character development and interesting ideas. More speculative fiction than science fiction.
34
715 membres
34 critiques
4
2 Members
jain, souloftherose
Explications
jain: Extended eligibility: UK published 2014, US published 2015.
35
105 membres
6 critiques
½ 3.3
2 Members
andyl, majkia
36
200 membres
19 critiques
3.9
2 Members
andyl, kara.shamy
37
2,585 membres
150 critiques
½ 3.4
38
332 membres
17 critiques
½ 3.6
39
355 membres
18 critiques
½ 3.7
2 Members
jain, majkia
40
121 membres
37 critiques
½ 3.6
41
133 membres
10 critiques
3.8
2 Members
jain, majkia
42
495 membres
28 critiques
3.8
2 Members
andyl, majkia
43
1,500 membres
90 critiques
4
44
180 membres
8 critiques
½ 3.5
2 Members
andyl, majkia
45
4,949 membres
248 critiques
4.1
46
188 membres
11 critiques
4
Member
karenb
47
2,452 membres
98 critiques
4.2
2 Members
Rtrace, majkia
48
46 membres
3 critiques
½ 3.6
Member
Lirleni
49
3,412 membres
197 critiques
½ 3.7
3 Members
Scorbet, TimSharrock, majkia,andyl ,merrystar
Explications
andyl : light entertainment not Hugo-worthy
50
220 membres
9 critiques
3.1
Member
Rtrace
51
1,223 membres
81 critiques
½ 3.7
52
70 membres
2 critiques
4
Member
Scorbet
53
68 membres
9 critiques
4
54
882 membres
38 critiques
3.8
Member
Rtrace
55
216 membres
25 critiques
½ 3.5
Member
andyl
56
131 membres
4 critiques
½ 3.3
Member
jain
57
850 membres
40 critiques
½ 3.4
Member
karenb
58
74 membres
9 critiques
3.2
59
430 membres
17 critiques
½ 3.6
Member
andyl
60
47 membres
2 critiques
½ 3.4
61
3,471 membres
124 critiques
4.1
Member
Rtrace
62
1,011 membres
65 critiques
½ 4.3
Member
Tapetum,Awfki
Explications
Awfki : #8 in a series. Didn't think it was appropriate for the Dresden book last year, don't think it's appropriate for this. Also, the three (four?) Kate Daniels books that I read at my daughter's request were good, but they weren't award winning good.
63
444 membres
32 critiques
4
Member
majkia
64
255 membres
15 critiques
4
Member
majkia
65
127 membres
1 critique
½ 3.6
Member
majkia
66
3,562 membres
146 critiques
4.1
Member
majkia
67
48 membres
6 critiques
½ 3.7
Member
andyl,tottman
68
420 membres
15 critiques
3.9
69
321 membres
14 critiques
3.1
70
145 membres
10 critiques
3.8
71
142 membres
9 critiques
½ 3.7
72
111 membres
9 critiques
4.1
73
107 membres
1 critique
3.2
74
106 membres
6 critiques
½ 3.3
75
79 membres
2 critiques
½ 3.6
76
43 membres
4 critiques
½ 2.4
77
40 membres
5 critiques
½ 3.7
78
31 membres
1 critique
3
79
21 membres
6 critiques
3
80
19 membres
1 critique
½ 4.3
81
554 membres
42 critiques
3.8
Member
majkia,Awfki
Explications
Awfki : Read it, sort of enjoyed it, but it doesn't deserve a Hugo.
82
192 membres
35 critiques
½ 3.5
Member
majkia,AnnieMod
Explications
AnnieMod : Weaker than his previous novel - and not really Hugo worthy.
83
7,368 membres
324 critiques
3.9
3 Members
Scorbet, majkia, kara.shamy,andyl ,jain ,souloftherose ,Settings
Explications
andyl : light entertainment not Hugo-worthy
Settings : This is a light popcorny novel. Recommended if you want something fun, but it doesn't have any qualities I think make it worthy of the Hugos.
84
162 membres
18 critiques
½ 3.4
Explications
AnnieMod : It is very light, not really Hugo worthy in my opinion but it is still readable (and eligible)
85
48 membres
3 critiques
3.9
Explications
AnnieMod : Not really Hugo worthy on its own.
86
Explications
AnnieMod : Not really Hugo worthy on its own.
87
Explications
AnnieMod : Not really Hugo worthy on its own.
88
14 membres
3.1