Photo de l'auteur
6+ oeuvres 386 utilisateurs 21 critiques 1 Favoris

A propos de l'auteur

Œuvres de Jess Winfield

Stitch! The Movie [2003 film] (2003) — Screenwriter; Actor; Producer — 120 exemplaires
Leroy & Stitch [2006 film] (2006) — Screenwriter; Producer — 48 exemplaires
My Name Is Will (2008) 1 exemplaire

Oeuvres associées

The Compleat Works of Wllm Shkspr (abridged) (1987)quelques éditions585 exemplaires
Living with Shakespeare: Essays by Writers, Actors, and Directors (2013) — Contributeur — 87 exemplaires

Étiqueté

Partage des connaissances

Autres noms
Borgeson, Jess
Date de naissance
1961-03-08
Sexe
male
Nationalité
USA
Lieux de résidence
Los Angeles, California, USA
Professions
novelist
playwright
screenwriter
Organisations
Reduced Shakespeare Company

Membres

Critiques

The Publisher Says: A tale of two Shakespeares . . .

Struggling UC Santa Cruz grad student Willie Shakespeare Greenberg is trying to write his thesis about the Bard. Kind of . . .

Cut off by his father for laziness, and desperate for dough, Willie agrees to deliver a single giant, psychedelic mushroom to a mysterious collector, making himself an unwitting target in Ronald Reagan’s War on Drugs.

Meanwhile, would-be playwright (and oppressed Catholic) William Shakespeare is eighteen years old and stuck teaching Latin in the boondocks of Stratford-upon-Avon. The future Bard’s life is turned upside down when a stranger entrusts him with a sacred relic from Rome . . . This, at a time when adherents of the “Old Faith” are being hanged, drawn, and quartered as traitors.

Seemingly separated in time and place, the lives of Willie and William begin to intersect in curious ways, from harrowing encounters with the law (and a few ex-girlfriends) to dubious experiments with mind-altering substances. Their misadventures could be dismissed as youthful folly. But wise or foolish, the bold choices they make will shape not only the “Shakespeare” each is destined to become . . . but the very course of history itself.

I RECEIVED AN ARC FROM THE PUBLISHER. THANK YOU.

My Review
: Tediously moralistic look at how Society tames us by taking hostages.

Heteronormative...shocking, I know...look at Will Shakespeare as horndog, transformed by Time (and parenthood) into...ya know what, if you like this kind of stuff you already know you like it. I don't much. Catholicism is a major vector for evil in this world, there's no denying that to anyone not an apologist; but Catholics ran the risk of horrible deaths in order to enact their fantasy of Religion. On the modern side, academia comes in for a lot of unkind "ribbing" that's meant to make one see that everyone is, at heart, a spoiled brat. These things are crumped together like they're somehow morally equivalent. They are not.

But worst of all, from my personal point of view, is the fact that I had to agree with the author about something:
Shakespeare, in some sense, helped create the modern man, didn't he, his influence is that pervasive. He held the mirror up to nature, but he also created that mirror: so the image he created is the very one we hold ourselves up to.

Stop with the deification already, recognize that there was a man called Shakespeare who wrote a bunch of cool stuff and take the rose-colored glasses off, he did whatever he did in his personal life and we can not speak about it because we don't know. Guessing is misleading, because you're going to think he did what you'd've done. Maybe...maybe not.

I didn't like it; I don't particularly recommend it; but it was not a waste of eyeblinks for that one excellent insight.
… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
richardderus | 20 autres critiques | Sep 7, 2022 |
If the first half of the book had been as good as the last half, I'd have given it 4 or 4.5 stars. As it happened, though, it took me a real effort of will to pick it up again after I put it down. The only thing that got me to read it again was my sense of responsibility ~ I got it for free in exchange for the review. I was very pleasantly surprised to find that the second half of the book was really good.

I wrote a fuller review at rel="nofollow" target="_top">http://justonemorepageblog.blogspot.com/2009/08/my-name-is-will-review.html.… (plus d'informations)
½
 
Signalé
Storeetllr | 20 autres critiques | Jan 9, 2017 |
Alright, I'm not going to lie. This book was a little weird. Fair warning, it alternates chapters. Every other chapter is about Willie and the others are about William Shakespeare. I was not prepared for that at first and got a little confused for the first two to three chapters (requiring me to go back and re-read them once I figured out what the hell was going on).

All that aside, I liked the beginning and the end, but the middle was a little trippy and farfetched, not to mention a tad convoluted at times. I will say this though, the title does NOT lie. This is a book of sex, drugs, & Shakespeare. Mostly, it's about drugs, then Shakespeare. The sex is just sort of sprinkled through out.

Anyway, the book was good. It wasn't one of my favorites, but I definitely enjoyed it. It was funny and raunchy and interesting all rolled up into one novel. Seriously though, the middle is weird. I'm pretty sure it wasn't only the characters who were trippin' during this story.
… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
cebellol | 20 autres critiques | Jul 22, 2014 |
The subtitle to this book is "A Novel of Sex, Drugs and Shakespeare." That's about as accurate a description as I think you can get.It is relatively well-written, though some of the descriptive passages felt a little forced. I thought that Winfield navigates the time flip (alternating chapters follow two distinct timelines) very well. The stories parallel each other enough to make sense, but not so much as to be repetitive. I think the flipping is useful as well in building some suspense, since you always have to wait to find out what happens next in either timeline.Both the sex and drugs parts of the book are well handled. They are presented to be highly entertaining, but not quite so much as to be gratuitous. They are also written in a way that makes it hard to believe these are not based on autobiographical accounts. Assuming they are not (as Winfield claims in an interview at the end of the book), I think that's an accomplishment - writing things that are just believable enough to have maybe happened but just crazy enough to be hard to believe.The Shakespeare bits are entertaining as well. It is clear that Winfield is both well versed in Shakespeare, and well practiced at playing with Shakespeare (neither being a surprise, given his background). I was especially impressed with the Elizabethan dialogue. I'm sure a true scholar would have many things to criticize, but if it was more authentic I imagine it would have been slow and tedious to follow. It got the point across - I could imagine Shakespeare speaking in the way Winfeild portrayed, even if I know it might not be accurate.In the interest of full disclosure, I read this after a string of non-fiction books, so anything was likely to feel engaging and entertaining. Regardless, I enjoyed the reading, and would recommend it to anyone looking for something fun, and a little irreverent.… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
Drifter83 | 20 autres critiques | Dec 23, 2010 |

Prix et récompenses

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Auteurs associés

Statistiques

Œuvres
6
Aussi par
2
Membres
386
Popularité
#62,660
Évaluation
3.9
Critiques
21
ISBN
14
Langues
1
Favoris
1

Tableaux et graphiques