Photo de l'auteur

Hannah Weiner (1928–1997)

Auteur de Hannah Weiner's Open House

17+ oeuvres 120 utilisateurs 1 Critiques 2 Favoris

A propos de l'auteur

Comprend les noms: Hanna Weiner

Œuvres de Hannah Weiner

Hannah Weiner's Open House (2006) 42 exemplaires
Spoke (1984) 16 exemplaires
We Speak Silent (1996) 8 exemplaires
The Fast (1992) 8 exemplaires
Code Poems (1982) 6 exemplaires
Page (2002) 6 exemplaires
Clairvoyant Journal 1974 (1978) 4 exemplaires
Weeks (1990) 4 exemplaires
Silent Teachers Remembered Sequel (1991) 3 exemplaires
Written in the Zero One (1985) 3 exemplaires
Nijole's House (1981) 3 exemplaires
Little books/indians (1980) 2 exemplaires
Country girl 1971 1 exemplaire

Oeuvres associées

unmuzzled ox 13 — Contributeur — 7 exemplaires
ACTS 4, Vol. 1, no. 4, Summer 1985 — Contributeur — 2 exemplaires
Personal Injury Magazine, no. 4 — Contributeur — 1 exemplaire
L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E, Number 9/10, (Vol. 2, No. 3 and 4) — Contributeur — 1 exemplaire
Crawl Out Your Window #2 — Contributeur — 1 exemplaire
Dark Ages Clasp the Daisy Root #1 — Contributeur — 1 exemplaire
Telephone 13 — Contributeur — 1 exemplaire

Étiqueté

Partage des connaissances

Date de naissance
1928-11-28
Date de décès
1997-09-11
Sexe
female
Nationalité
USA
Lieu de naissance
Providence, Rhode Island, USA
Lieu du décès
New York, New York, USA
Lieux de résidence
New York, New York, USA
Études
Radcliffe College
Professions
poet
Organisations
A.H. Schreiber Co., Inc.
Courte biographie
Hannah Weiner, née Finegold, was born in Providence, Rhode Island and attended Radcliffe College. She graduated in 1950 with a B.A. after writing a dissertation on Henry James. She moved to New York City and worked in publishing and at Bloomingdale's department store. She started writing poetry in the 1960s, and published her first collection, The Magritte Poems after René Magritte, in 1970. In the following years, she began writing a series of journals that were partly the result of experiments with automatic writing, which she called " clairvoyant poems." Her published works included Clairvoyant Journal (1973), Little Books/Indians (1980), Code Poems (1982), SPOKE (1984), The Fast (1992), and We Speak Silent (1996). Interest in her work continued after her death with the publication in 2007 of a collection called Hannah Weiner's Open House, edited by Patrick F. Durgin. She is often grouped with the avant garde group known as the Language poets.

Membres

Critiques

review of
Hannah Weiner's Open House
by tENTATIVELY, a cONVENIENCE - August 31, 2014

Don't I EVER run out of things to say & 'too many words' to say it in?! Apparently not. Click on the link for the full review:
https://www.goodreads.com/story/show/372092-hannah-weiner-s-open-house-opened

Hannah Weiner & I read on the same bill at the EAR INN in NYC on January 9, 1982. You can read a description of my part of the reading here: http://idioideo.pleintekst.nl/MereOutline1982.html . I was 28, Hannah was 53. That was my 1st reading in NY. The EAR INN was where the Language Poets were reading at the time. As I recall, I had the impression that Hannah & I were on the same bill b/c we were the 'lunatic fringe' of the 'Language Poets', b/c we didn't quite fit in.

I knew about Hannah mainly as the author of Clairvoyant Journals & I'm sure I wd've read the 1978 issue of Kirby Malone & Marshall Reese's "E pod #3" wch published Hannah's "eleven days from Clairvoyant Journal 1973" along w/ Jackson Mac Low's "Homage to Leona Bleiweiss". I may've also read her Clairvoyant Journal 1974 (Angel Hair Books, 1978) by then & any contributions she might've made to "L=A=N=G=U=A=G=E" magazine such as "CAPITALISTIC USELESS PHRASES AFTER ENDLESS" amongst other things I'm not remembering. That sd, I don't think I had a broad knowledge of her work.

At this EAR INN reading I had deliberately restricted myself to only speaking prepared texts so that I'd be giving a reading the entire time I was there. I had 61 prepared single sentence texts on specially shaped cards that were for 'small talk'. This, of course, inhibited actual conversation between people. Nonetheless, somehow Hannah & I discussed guerrilla actions on the streets. I somehow told her that that was what I did & that that was one of my primary interests & Hannah told me that she had also done guerrilla actions. This upped my interest level in her.

"I am trying to understand through my continued writing which of these WORDS I see are 1) my own ordinary conscious thought; 2) from my developed superconscious mind which has precognitive, clairvoyant powers; 3) telepathic connections with living people; 4) BIG QUESTION communications from non-living forces." - "The words in CAPITALS and underlines are words I see" - p 63

"Spoke (Sun & Moon) was written differently. The words appeared on my forehead in groups short enough for me to remember and write them down and the continuation or interrruptions were included in this word-group seeing. This is true even though the style varies from a journalistic technique (June & July) to a poetic technique (August) and a prose technique (Sept.). The exceptions are the large words which appeared once on every page, about 3/4 of the way through, as I was writing down the seen forehead phrases. Words for Spoke were not seen on any furniture, in the air, or otherwise. This, as far as I can remember, was also pretty much the same technique for the long poems Nijole's House (Potes & Poets Press) and Sixteen (Awede)."

[..]

"I saw words in a wide variety of sizes, script and printed, on my own forehead (the large capital words on my forehead began in a retreat in June 1973 (Unpublished Journals, 1973) and on other people, forehead included" - "MOSTLY ABOUT THE SENTENCE" - pp 125-126 & 126

Since I knew Hannah as the writer who transcribed words that she envisioned on her own forehead & on the foreheads of others & on other such places where most people don't see words I was under the impression that she was looking at my forehead & reading from there as we spoke. I wondered whether she liked what she read. Whatever she read there, if anything, she was very friendly to me & I was relieved - after all, having someone read words on yr forehead is akin to having someone dream about you: you don't know whether you're the villain or not.

I don't know whether I met Hannah on other occasions, I suspect I did. In September of 1982 I published a tape called "Public Language" w/ her reading on it - arguably the 1st published Language Poetry recording - still available here: http://idioideo.pleintekst.nl/WdmUCatalog.html . At any rate, I liked her - but while I found her clairvoyant writing interesting I was more interested in writers who worked from a significantly new basic structural premise for every new piece - wch basically meant just about nobody except for myself & Concrete Poets (&, as I probably later learned, OuLiPo writers) [Ha ha! Imagine the outrage of some people reading that claim!]. In other words, I think I thought that Hannah was a bit of a one-trick pony.

NOT SO! & this excellent compilation edited & introduced by Patrick F. Durgin of Kenning Editions, the publisher, is what drove that home for me. Not only was Hannah a more diverse writer than I realized, she was more politically conscious than I realized & more articulate in her writing theory.

P 9 essentially starts the bk off w/ a reprinting of a poster advertising a series of events called "HANNAH WEINER'S OPEN HOUSE" - hence explaining the title of the bk. This series consisted of events at 7 locations over 2 days (Oct 4 & 5, 1969) & involved the participation of Vito Acconci, someone whose work I deeply respect, Bernadette Mayer, ditto, John Perreault, Weiner, Abraham Lubelski, Marjorie Strider, & Arakawa (another person whose work has caught my attn). In "Sreet Works I, II, III, IV, V" she explains:

"I. March 15, 1969. In mid-town Manhattan, I pasted blank labels on signs, doors, walls, posts, etc. in order to draw attention to the environment.

"II. April 18, 1969. I met the other Hannah Weiner. She is tall and blonde. I am short and dark. She does Psychodrama."

[..]

"IV."

[..]

"During the month of October, for IV, I did OPEN HOUSE. I invited the public into the homes of participating artists. From 3 to 26 people showed up at different places. We sat around kitchen tables, or on the floor and talked and smoked or had a party. I met new friends." - p 25

Wow! This resonates deeply w/ me. Sometime in the mid 1970s I conceived of a piece, & probably wrote instructions for it, to gather together a large group of people to cover over all locations signs in an area, such as street signs, w/ fly paper so that the words wd disappear & air-born whatevers wd adhere on the signs instead. Hannah & I were much more on the same page than I'd ever realized! (Not to mention that I was an "honorary member" of a group called "Psycodrama" [sic].)

Durgin writes in his Intro that "The entire Clairvoyant Journal project, beginning with The Fast (United Artists, 1992) and Country Girl (Kenning Editions, 2004), and continuing with Pictures and Early Words, Big Words, and the Clairvoyant Journal proper, spans a period synonymous with the onset of what was diagnosed as psychotic episodes indicative of schizophrenia." (p 13)

As a person positively inclined toward what little I know of the Anti-Psychiatry mvmt & very pro self-definition, I'm always on the lookout for people who self-define contrarily to such psychoanalysis. After all, what gives psychologists the ultimate say-so on the mindsets of others? Their expertise? Perhaps the person they're appraising is more expert on the subject of their own mind than the shrinks are - at least they shd be if they're introspective. Beware of letting other people define you!

To my delight, Weiner does an excellent job of defining her experiences in her own terms - or, possibly, in the terms of open-minded & supportive friends. As Durgin perspicaciously explains later on in the Intro:

"As Judith Goldman and others have duly noted, it is disingenuous to equate what Weiner called "clairvoyance" with either illness or a supernatural gift of fortune-telling. Although Weiner's claims regarding clairvoyance are, to many readers, her calling card, it's important to relativize those claims in terms of form and content, especially form. This is why clairvoyance can be more appropriately synonymous with, in her own words, "clairstyle."" - p 16

For those of you unfamiliar w/ what this "clairstyle" entails, the Intro quotes from a New Wilderness Audiographics audio cassettes release's liner notes:

"In 1970 Hannah Weiner began to see pictures and energy fields. Two years later she began to see words. This came after a period of intense artistic activity in the late 60s, and after experimentation with altered states of consciousness and the development of a strong belief in yoga. She was interested in signaling, and had just completed a series of Code Poem performances, using the "International Code of Signals for the Use of All Nations."

"After nine months of seeing disorganized words in small print, all over the place—on curtains, walls, toes—she went on a retreat conducted by Swami Satchitananda. There, for the first time she saw words clearly printed, in capitals, on her forehead." - p 16

She expressed this by developing a typography that distinguished between the different ways she experienced the words. More about that later. Back to how she defines her experience:

"I bought a new electric typewriter in January 74 and said quite clearly, perhaps aloud, to the words (I talked to them as if they were separate from me, as indeed the part of my mind they come from is not known to me)" - p 127

Note that she attributes the origin of the words to a part of her mind not known to her. I suspect that it's more common for people who experience such voices, usually heard instead of seen, to consider them to be of external origin. I'm reminded of a woman I met while waiting for a bus in a Greyhound stn in Harrisburg, PA. The woman told me that she hears voices originating from a man named Michael & that he constantly orders her around - telling her to do things like stand up & salute when an American flag appears on TV. Since both she & I found that oppressive & since I was trying to help her in the simplest way during this brief encounter, I suggested to her that she didn't need to follow his orders. Now cf Hannah's description(s):

"Living with these words is like living under orders. It always knows more than I do so I usually obey the directions, trying to put aside my personality, EGO, desires, habits, etc., except for fatigue which often stops me.
" - "The words in CAPITALS and underlines are words I see" - p 64

The Clairvoyant Journal published by Angel Hair (Anne Waldman again) has enuf typographical diversity to keep me visually interested & I find the clairstyle justification to make it even more interesting since it deviates from the more expected aesthetic motivations. The last page in the "CLAIRVOYANT JOURNAL" excerpt ends on "thas enough of this page" laid out as a very neat circle in wch the letters become backwards as they pass the 4 o'clock point. (p 74)

"Especially in the Clairvoyant Journal the person writing is bossed around by voices, and gives up her autonomy to the other parts of herself. A relinquishing of constant conscious control to let the other part of the mind dominate. The ego belongs to the conscious part, the writer's voice, and often, or nearly always, I reacted with some ego controlled emotion such as anger or impatience or amusement to the seen words or voices." - "MOSTLY ABOUT THE SENTENCE" - p 131

"I was afraid to leave immediately on signal and dont obey instructions" - "FROM SPOKE" - p 105

She, too, is receiving orders but she considers the orders to be from an unconscious part of her mind & she relinquishes conscious control b/c she thinks "It always knows more". I'm not convinced "It always knows more" & that following the orders is a good idea but at least Weiner self-defines the process (or, perhaps, her psychoanalyst provided this explanation) & proactively uses it to produce what I find to be interesting writing.

"The manuscript begins in the fall of 1970, describing a 3 week fast. The early material contains much information on the nature of the kundalini energy and electro magnetic sensitivity that I have never seen elsewhere. KNOWLEDGE. I was receiving messages" [reviewer's note: the original typography has the word "FORCE" above the word "messages" & slightly encroaching on the word "magnetic" wch appears above it. I don't know how to reproduce that arrangement in this review.] "through FEELING energy at that time. Later pictures developed, and colors. Then in Aug. 1972 words developed.

"Unfortunately the fasting experience left my body weakened and I am still ill often and tire easily. I feel that I should spend my time working with this gift. MONEY. It leaves me without a source of income." - "The words in CAPITALS and underlines are words I see" - p 63

A few words about fasting.. & MONEY. I've fasted many times, more than I can recall but at least 10, probably more. I started when I was, perhaps, 28, most recently when I was 59. I've fasted for 3 wks at least twice, for 4 wks definitely twice. Let's say Hannah was 41 when she fasted. I was 43 when I last fasted for 4 wks. That was the 1st time fasting seemed to take a toll on me. Before that I'd always felt excellent during the fast & after. Last yr when I fasted for 3 wks at age 59 I felt great, psychologically & physically. Thanks to the vicious shenanigans of a former friend of mine, I was in dire poverty & cdn't really 'afford' to eat anyway. It felt great to lose weight, averaging about a pound a day, but I've noted that my body has developed the habit of gaining it bak ASAP - the weight loss, despite its being healthy, is responded to as an emergency. Fast w/ care but don't be put off it altogether.

"MONEY"? Yeah, what a drag. I've never had much of it & never will. No matter how intelligent you are, no matter how creative you are you're going to be 'valued' mostly by what class you're in: if you're born into ruling elites yr value is immediately higher for one yr than what I have to live on throughout my entire life. No need for a get-out-of-jail card either: you're considerably less likely to ever go there. As I'm fond of saying: "I hate money but my _____ [originally I put "landlady" in the blank but any bill collector will do] loves it!" In other words, those of us born into the 'Western World' are mostly born indentured servants. Is it any wonder so many of us try to be runaway slaves?

But let's get back to the beginning of the bk again:

""My life is my art. I am my object, a product of the process of self-awareness. I work part-time as a designer of ladies underwear to help support myself. I like my job, and the firm I work for. They make and sell a product without unnecessary competition. The people in the firm are friendly and fun to work with. The bikini pants I make sell for 49¢ and $1.00. If things can't be free, they should be as cheap as possible. Why waste time and energy to afford?

"Art is live people. Self respect is a job if you need it. On 3 Wednesday evenings I will be at my studio, where I work. My boss, Simeon Schreiber, will be with me. There will be bikini underpants for sale, at the usual prices, and one made especially for this show by August Fabrics and A. H. Schreiber, to whom I am grateful."" - "OPEN GROUND PRESENTS HANNAH WEINER AT HER JOB" - p 23

I wrote above that "I was more interested in writers who worked from a significantly new basic structural premise for every new piece" & this compilation gives an excellent glimpse into the variety that Weiner produced w/o my having previously known about it. How many people have people visit them at their job as an opening of their "first one man show"? (p 23)

What I'd like to know more about, tho, is why Weiner seems to've started such activities so late in life. She was born November 4, 1928. This "first one man show" was March 11, 18, & 25, 1970ish. She wd've been 41 at the time. The earliest work represented in this bk seems to date from 1969 when she was 40. "i had just at 35 started to write" (p 59) Why so late? What was she doing before then?! The earliest significant writing of mine that I can remember was done at age 13.

In "THE MAGRITTE POEMS", footnote numbers are interpolated. These footnotes are extensions of the poems rather than the more typical explication - a formal device that I enjoy:

"Amorous Perspective

I rushed through the door.
You had bitten a way for me. (1)

1. See your dentist every six months for a regular check up." - pp 26 & 28

"The Golden Legend

Magritte, damn
your stone loaves (8)
that float past
my hungry
window!

8. made from wheat and rye flour, rye meal, yeast, table salt, vegetable shortening, malt, caraway seeds, caramel, onion powder, calcium propionate and water." - pp 28 & 29

& then there are the Code Poems. I love these. When I started reading this I realized that the entire bk is 'waiting' to be read on one of my voluminous bk piles. "These poems and performance pieces are from the INTERNATIONAL CODE OF SIGNALS for the Use of All Nations, British Editions 1859, 1899 and American Edition, post-war, 1931, a visual signal system for ships at sea." (p 34) Wonderful! Taking these very purposeful codes out of context & repurposing them has an OuLiPian quality of humor-producing restraint. I found her "Romeo and Juliet" particularly rich:

"
SDQ Romeo: What is her name?
SDL Juliet: My name is
J Juliet
ENC dazzling, am, is, are
SDT What is your name?
SLD Romeo: My name is
R Romeo
EBQ Juliet: Your name is not on my list: spell it alphabetically
JG Romeo: I wish to have personal communication with you
" - p 36

Weiner takes advantage of this Semaphore code's use of the International Radiotelephony Spelling Alphabet's inclusion of "Romeo" as the way of clarifying the letter "R" & the word "Juliet[t]" as the clarification of the letter "J". Obviously, these 2 names wd've been picked b/c of the familiarity of the famous Shakespeare play. Hannah takes this a step further. For those of you not familiar w/ this alphabet:

"The NATO phonetic alphabet, more accurately known as the International Radiotelephony Spelling Alphabet and also called the ICAO phonetic or ICAO spelling alphabet, as well as the ITU phonetic alphabet, is the most widely used spelling alphabet. Although often called "phonetic alphabets", spelling alphabets are not associated with phonetic transcription systems such as the International Phonetic Alphabet. Instead, the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) alphabet assigned code words acrophonically to the letters of the English alphabet so that critical combinations of letters and numbers can be pronounced and understood by those who transmit and receive voice messages by radio or telephone regardless of language barriers or the presence of transmission static.

"The 26 code words in the NATO phonetic alphabet are assigned to the 26 letters of the English alphabet in alphabetical order as follows: Alfa, Bravo, Charlie, Delta, Echo, Foxtrot, Golf, Hotel, India, Juliett, Kilo, Lima, Mike, November, Oscar, Papa, Quebec, Romeo, Sierra, Tango, Uniform, Victor, Whiskey, X-ray, Yankee, Zulu." - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_phonetic_alphabet
… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
tENTATIVELY | Apr 3, 2022 |

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Auteurs associés

Statistiques

Œuvres
17
Aussi par
7
Membres
120
Popularité
#165,356
Évaluation
4.1
Critiques
1
ISBN
13
Langues
1
Favoris
2

Tableaux et graphiques