Photo de l'auteur
9+ oeuvres 393 utilisateurs 3 critiques

A propos de l'auteur

Retha M. Warnicke is a professor of History in the School of Historical, Philosophical, and Religious Studies at Arizona State University. She is the author of numerous books on Tudor England, including The Rise and Fall of Anne Boleyn.

Œuvres de Retha M. Warnicke

Oeuvres associées

Tudor Political Culture (1995) — Contributeur — 3 exemplaires

Étiqueté

Partage des connaissances

Nom canonique
Warnicke, Retha M.
Autres noms
Warnicke, Retha Marvine
Date de naissance
1939
Sexe
female
Nationalité
USA
Études
Indiana University (BA, 1961)
Harvard University (MA, 1963; PhD, 1969)
Professions
historian
biographer
scholar
professor of history
Organisations
Arizona State University
Royal Historical Society
Society for the Study of Early Modern Women
Prix et distinctions
Phi Beta Kappa
Courte biographie
Retha M. Warnicke is an historian specializing in the study of politics and protocol at the English court of the Tudor era, and gender issues, especially focused on women and on queenship. During her senior year of college, she won the Listenfelt Scholarship for outstanding Undergraduate History Major, followed in 1961 by a Woodrow Wilson Fellowship. She rose through the ranks to become Professor of History at Arizona State University. She was the Director of Graduate Studies at the History Department from 1987–1992, and she was Chair of the History Department from 1992-1998. Professor Warnicke was the first woman hired in the History Department of ASU, and taught the first Women's History course ever offered there. She is best known for her controversial theories over the life of Henry VIII's second wife, Anne Boleyn. These theories were outlined in various articles in the mid-1980s and elaborated in her 1989 book The Rise and Fall of Anne Boleyn: Family Politics at the Court of Henry VIII. Professor Warnicke has served on editorial boards, such as the Medieval Renaissance Texts and Studies. In 2005, she was elected to the nominating committee of the Society for the Study of Early Modern Women. A charter member of this society, she became its second president in 1995. The National Endowment for the Humanities selected her as a panelist twice. She belongs to several prestigious societies, including the Royal Historical Society. She participates regularly in conferences of the Pacific Coast Branch of the North American Conference on British Studies and also of the Arizona Center for Medieval and Renaissance Studies.

Membres

Critiques

I adored Warnicke's The Rise and Fall of Anne Boleyn and I suppose I expected something more along that line.
This books seems more to focus on marrying practices and customs and less on Anne of Cleves-a character I am rather fond of.
 
Signalé
LoisSusan | Dec 10, 2020 |
Warnicke's book is interesting and worth reading, but Eric Ives' Anne Boleyn takes a very different slant on things, and I would read both, especially since Warnicke says that her purpose is not to write a full scale biography but to deal with certain issues.

Warnicke and Ives are in agreement in their tendency to discount a lot of the evidence from Imperial sources as both biased and contradictory, so their conclusions differ from those of authors a decade or more before. They also have dramatic differences between them, one of the main points of disagreement being when Anne Boleyn was born. This is a very vexed subject.

Beyond these interpretations, I have some issues with Warnicke myself. One might call the first philosophical: Warnicke seems to believe that people, particularly Henry VIII, have a single motive for their actions, whereas I think that people often act from mixed motives. Warnicke asserts that the only reason for Henry's desire to terminate his marriage with Catherine of Aragon was his sincere conviction that it was illegitimate. She therefore rejects interpretations of some of his actions on the grounds that it was impossible for him to be acting out of any other motive.

I am not convinced by her explanation of the reasons for Anne's death. If Henry, etc., honestly thought she was a witch, why was she tried for adultery rather than witchcraft? Why not charge with adultery and witchcraft? Warnicke makes it very clear why charges of adultery and other forbidden sexual conduct would support a charge of witchcraft, but she wasn't tried as a witch. Why fabricate charges of adultery, as Warnicke thinks they did, while broadly hinting at witchcraft? The fetus that Anne miscarried is held to be evidence of witchcraft, but why advertise that and then place no charges?

The book has created something of a stir, and I'd advise anyone who wants to be au courant about Anne Boleyn to read it.
… (plus d'informations)
2 voter
Signalé
PuddinTame | 1 autre critique | Aug 12, 2009 |
The reason I wanted to read this book was its inclusion in the list of further reading that Philippa Gregory set out at the end of The Other Boleyn Girl; the reason for Anne's downfall in the novel is based on Warnicke's thesis of her last miscarriage in January 1536 - that she lost a deformed foetus that was interpreted as a punishment for her sexual sins and/or as a sign that she was a witch. I haven't read that much about Anne, so I had struggled a bit to follow all the events but overall I found Warnicke's view of events convincingly argued.

A fascinating book; I'm itching to re-read Gregory's novel and I got David Starkey's book about Henry's wives out of library today (I've seen his TV series on it but I've forgotten most of it).
… (plus d'informations)
1 voter
Signalé
mari_reads | 1 autre critique | Aug 27, 2006 |

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Auteurs associés

Peter Miller Cover designer

Statistiques

Œuvres
9
Aussi par
1
Membres
393
Popularité
#61,674
Évaluation
½ 3.6
Critiques
3
ISBN
16

Tableaux et graphiques