Thomas Stanley (1)
Auteur de Pythagoras
Pour les autres auteurs qui s'appellent Thomas Stanley, voyez la page de désambigüisation.
Œuvres de Thomas Stanley
Poems & Translations of Thomas Stanley 1 exemplaire
Historia philosophiæ orientalis 1 exemplaire
The History of Philosophy, in Eight Parts 1 exemplaire
Pythagorus 1 exemplaire
Oeuvres associées
Étiqueté
Partage des connaissances
- Date de naissance
- 1625
- Date de décès
- 1679-04-12
- Sexe
- male
- Nationalité
- England
- Lieux de résidence
- Cumberlow, Hertfordshire, England (birth)
London, England (death) - Études
- Cambridge University (Pembroke Hall now Pembroke College)
Oxford University - Professions
- poet
historian of philosophy
translator
Membres
Critiques
Listes
Vous aimerez peut-être aussi
Auteurs associés
Statistiques
- Œuvres
- 7
- Aussi par
- 2
- Membres
- 80
- Popularité
- #224,854
- Évaluation
- 4.0
- Critiques
- 3
- ISBN
- 11
Pythagoras was first inspired to study math because of strings. He and his team's work on harmony and (untampered) pure modes was what led to geometry, and the study of observed number relationships. The hammer weight story is wrong. The team used strings attached to measured boards for their experimental study.
Take an oscilloscope and just look at string waves when plucked vs when bowed with horse hair, and see a pure wave vs a ragged coastline-style wave. See brass-instrument waves, almost pure but with a single disruption caused by crossing lips. The wave shapes on the oscilloscopes sure look to me like extra dimensions are easily viewable. Do string-theorists play music instruments?
Maybe the extra energy which string theory says is transferring to the extra dimensions is like the feelings you get when a band is flopping and everybody feels awkward and wants to leave, or when a band is wailing and ripping and everybody dances hard!
We are standing looking up at gravitational waves, string theory, and other phenomena in the same way Greeks of their time looked at the stars. They were desperate to understand but did not have the equipment to search for answers. We are touching on theories and wish we had more understanding because we know this is monumental knowledge, if only we could find out more.
Ridiculous theory more like. How can the universe be fundamentally made up of strings? Surely rope theory would be more of a robust theory? Vibration my atoms. What a load of atomic noise and silence. Stars and black holes my not Adams ample. If evolution was real there would be billions of people not believing in anything. Why would you need to if you understood your thoughts?… (plus d'informations)