Photo de l'auteur

Chaïm Perelman (1912–1984)

Auteur de Traité de l'argumentation : La nouvelle rhétorique

21 oeuvres 504 utilisateurs 4 critiques

A propos de l'auteur

Séries

Œuvres de Chaïm Perelman

Étiqueté

Partage des connaissances

Nom canonique
Perelman, Chaïm
Nom légal
Perelman, Chaïm
Date de naissance
1912-05-20
Date de décès
1984-01-22
Sexe
male
Nationalité
Poland (birth)
Belgium
Lieu de naissance
Warsaw, Poland
Lieu du décès
Brussels, Belgium
Lieux de résidence
Warsaw, Belgium
Antwerp, Belgium
Bruxelles, Belgium
Études
Université Libre de Bruxelles (Doc|Law|1934)
Université Libre de Bruxelles (Doc|1938)
Professions
philosopher
Professor
logician
Relations
Maneli, Mieczysław (friend)
Olbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie (co-author)
Organisations
Université libre de Bruxelles
Pennsylvania State University
Société Belge de Philosophie (president)
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (board of governors)
Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie (secretary-general)
Prix et distinctions
Francqui Prize (Human Sciences, 1962)
Baronage (Belgian Parlament, 1983)
Courte biographie
Chaïm Perelman was born to a Jewish family in Warsaw, Poland. His father was a diamond trader, and the family immigrated to Antwerp, Belgium in 1925. He studied at the Université Libre de Bruxelles, where he earned two doctorates, one in law in 1934, and the other in philosophy in 1938. That year, he was appointed a lecturer in the Faculty of Philosophy and Letters. He married historian Fela (Fajga) Estera Liwer in 1935. During World War II, the Perelmans worked with the Comité de Défense des Juifs, the Belgian Jewish resistance organization, and helped rescue Jewish children. By the end of the war, Prof. Perelman had risen to become professor of logic and metaphysics, the youngest full professor in the history of the university. He helped found the organization Aide aux Israélites Victimes de la Guerre to aid Holocaust survivors and refugees. An ardent supporter of Israel, he served on the board of governors of the Hebrew University of Jerusalem. In 1948, he began working with Lucie Olbrechts-Tyteca on a project that would eventually establish ancient rhetoric as the foundation for a logic of value judgments. In 1958, they published their magnum opus, Traité de l'argumentation: La nouvelle rhétorique (English translation, The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation, 1969). In 1962, Prof. Perelman was invited to Pennsylvania State University as a distinguished visiting professor. That same year, he was awarded the Francqui Prize for Human Sciences. He was director of the National Center for Research in Logic at the Université Libre de Bruxelles. He served as president of the Société Belge de Philosophie and secretary-general of the Fédération Internationale des Sociétés de Philosophie. He published numerous articles in philosophical journals, and other books that included Justice et Raison (1963), and Rhétorique et Philosophie (1952). In recognition of his accomplishments, Prof. Perelman was appointed to the peerage as a baron by the Belgian legislature in 1983.

Membres

Critiques

Posso dirne solo bene. Che piacere un libro che procede ordinatamente, chiarendo ben bene i termini del discorso, costruendo per gradi e con completezza.

E però confesso che non riesco ad andare ulteriormente avanti. Non sono, è chiaro, un buon comunicatore :(
 
Signalé
kenshin79 | Jul 25, 2023 |
muy buena obra, firmada en el año 44 un canto de fe y esperanza en oscuros años. La justicia en definitiva esta basada en valores que son en definitiva arbitrarios y en consecuencia, debemos comprender al otro y los valores que pueda tener
 
Signalé
gneoflavio | May 11, 2021 |
This is an excellent introductory work. The author walks the reader through philosophical mindsets beginning with the Greeks and ending with Kant. The chapter on Kant is a good short outline of Kant's Critique of Pure Reason. The first year philosophy student would do well with this book in their backpack.
½
 
Signalé
galacticus | Jan 14, 2014 |
I'm not satisfied after having read this book. Or possibly, I am just confused. I get the feeling that when Perelman made the connection in his mind between formal logic and the racist arguments of the Nazis, he created an obstacle for himself, and he had to contort his own system of informal logic to work around it at all costs. (After all, the the arguments of the Nazis were the opposite of appeals to the rationality.) But ultimately, I get the feeling that his system is really just shorthand for formal logic. Whether you base your arguments on first principles or human foibles, the force of argument is still reducible via analysis to the traditional rules. There is indeed a sense in which an audience is convinced informally by an argument, but the process of critical thinking that we apply to evaluate it is not more than the formalized tools which have come to us from the ancient philosophers.

The value of this book may be that it could be a starting point for looking at the ways in which an argument may be accepted by a human audience, especially a non-sophisticated one. But I think the goal for every human being is to reduce the irrational and non-rational portions as much as possible.
… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
mikebridge | Oct 25, 2006 |

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Auteurs associés

Statistiques

Œuvres
21
Membres
504
Popularité
#49,151
Évaluation
3.8
Critiques
4
ISBN
62
Langues
12

Tableaux et graphiques