Huey P. Newton (1942–1989)
Auteur de Revolutionary Suicide
A propos de l'auteur
Crédit image: Image of Huey P. Newton from national Archives Footage By Department of Justice. Federal Bureau of Investigation. 1935- (Most Recent)From: Series: Motion Picture Films and Video Recordings, ca. 1936 - ca. 1985Record Group 65: Records of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, 1896 - 2008, Public Domain, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=66559222
Œuvres de Huey P. Newton
Essays from the Minister of Defense 4 exemplaires
The Last Speeches of Huey P. Newton 4 exemplaires
Prison, Where is Thy Victory? 3 exemplaires
Huey Newton Talks to the Movement about the Black Panther Party, Cultural Nationalism, Sncc, Liberals, and White… (1968) 2 exemplaires
Black Politics : A Journal of Liberation Vol. 1, #4 & 5: Special Issue -- Huey P. Newton (1968) 2 exemplaires
The Black Panther leaders speak : Huey P. Newton, Bobby Seale, Eldridge Cleaver and company speak out through the Black… (1976) 2 exemplaires
Intercommunalism (1974) 1 exemplaire
Black Panther San Francisco State: on strike 1 exemplaire
Oeuvres associées
Étiqueté
Partage des connaissances
- Autres noms
- Newton, Huey Percy (birth name)
- Date de naissance
- 1942-02-17
- Date de décès
- 1989-08-22
- Sexe
- male
- Nationalité
- USA
- Lieu de naissance
- Monroe, Louisiana, USA
- Lieu du décès
- Oakland, California, USA
- Cause du décès
- murder
- Études
- University of California, Santa Cruz (PhD|1980)
- Organisations
- Black Panther Party (co-founder)
Membres
Critiques
Vous aimerez peut-être aussi
Auteurs associés
Statistiques
- Œuvres
- 21
- Aussi par
- 4
- Membres
- 905
- Popularité
- #28,349
- Évaluation
- 4.0
- Critiques
- 10
- ISBN
- 29
- Langues
- 2
The biggest frustration here is that he never really explains deeply some of his positions - I'm thinking primarily here of his ideas about intercommunalism. I don't know if he just never wrote more articles answering questions on the topic or what but I didn't really get a good grip on what he's talking about, which is annoying because it seems to have been an important part of his later ideology. Overall the impression you get is of someone who is serious about working in the Marxist tradition (he rejects the term Marxist because of its connotations with dogmatic people who believe in re-runs of 1917) - he talks constantly about dialectics, he references Mao, Che, Marx, Lenin (both directly and through borrowed metaphors etc), he focuses on the economic dimension. He constantly criticises himself and previous party positions and comes across as highly honest and dedicated. I came away from the book impressed by a revolutionary hero.… (plus d'informations)