Photo de l'auteur

Azar Nafisi

Auteur de Lire Lolita à Téhéran

9+ oeuvres 14,333 utilisateurs 320 critiques 14 Favoris

A propos de l'auteur

AZAR NAFISI is a visiting professor and the director of the Dialogue Project at the Foreign Policy Institute of Johns Hopkins University. She has taught Western literature at the University of Tehran, the Free Islamic University, and the University of Allameh Tabatabai in Iran. In 1994 she won a afficher plus teaching fellowship from Oxford University, and in 1997 she and her family left Iran for America. She has written for The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and The New Republic and has appeared on radio and television programs. Azar's book, Reading Lolita in Tehran, was published in 2003 to wide acclaim. (Bowker Author Biography) afficher moins
Crédit image: Author Azar Nafisi at the 2015 Texas Book Festival. By Larry D. Moore, CC BY-SA 4.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=44476478

Œuvres de Azar Nafisi

Lire Lolita à Téhéran (2003) 13,147 exemplaires, 281 critiques
Mémoires captives (2008) 666 exemplaires, 18 critiques
The Republic of Imagination: America in Three Books (2014) 343 exemplaires, 15 critiques
Bibi and the Green Voice (2006) 4 exemplaires
Nafisi, Azar Archive 1 exemplaire

Oeuvres associées

Le livre des rois. Shâhnâmè (1010) — Avant-propos, quelques éditions793 exemplaires, 5 critiques
Light the Dark: Writers on Creativity, Inspiration, and the Artistic Process (2017) — Contributeur — 144 exemplaires, 4 critiques
My Sister, Guard Your Veil; My Brother, Guard Your Eyes: Uncensored Iranian Voices (2006) — Contributeur — 108 exemplaires, 3 critiques
Last Folio: Textures of Jewish Life in Slovakia (2011) — Contributeur — 15 exemplaires
Inge Morath: Iran (2009) — Contributeur — 14 exemplaires

Étiqueté

Partage des connaissances

Membres

Critiques

I've been somewhat distracted from leisure reading this week, as I’ve started a new job, read a great deal of research in a new field, moved house, and learned to use a smart phone for the first time. Nonetheless, I’ve also enjoyed this striking, thoughtful book. The narrative is deliberately meandering, skipping about in time and wending its way between classic Western literature and political life in late 20th century Iran. Prior to this, my only knowledge of the country was gleaned from Marjane Satrapi’s [b:Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood|9516|Persepolis The Story of a Childhood (Persepolis, #1)|Marjane Satrapi|https://images.gr-assets.com/books/1425871473s/9516.jpg|3303888] and the film ‘A Girl Walks Home Alone at Night’ (which concerns a vampire). Nafasi taught literature in Iran for many years and reflects on her experiences and those of her students. Almost all the voices included are women, who suffer disproportionate dangers and indignities under the tyrannical government. A fascinating range of women’s experiences are included. For example, Nafasi herself resisted wearing the veil until it became a legal requirement, whereas some of her students who already wore it prior to its imposition felt that this made their deliberate religious choice meaningless by making it a politicised imperative for all women. Despite hating the regime, Nafasi also cautions her students about idealising the West and they discuss their ambivalent feelings about leaving Iran. It all adds up to a thought-provoking and nuanced literary-political memoir.

Nafasi’s thesis, as it were, is most clearly articulated in an interview included in the back of the edition I read. She talks about how great literature provides glimpses of truth, beauty, and different worlds that are especially valuable in repressive, totalitarian conditions. Nafasi comes across as an articulate writer and an excellent teacher. She has an excellent way of describing the importance of books:

Reading is an exchange, a constant conversation between the reader, the text, and the writer. It is a way of interpreting and connecting to the world. We read because of our urge to know, because we are curious about others and aspects of ourselves that we have little knowledge of. Through this curiosity we gain the empathy that defines us as human. While reading is a private and intimate act it also becomes a way of connecting and empathising with those who we have never seen; it makes it possible for us to belong to a community of invisible conversations, constantly providing us with new experiences.
… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
annarchism | 280 autres critiques | Aug 4, 2024 |
Azar Afisi's memoir makes a good case for reading the classics of Western literature no matter where you are. Her perspectives on her students' plight, the ongoing struggle of Iranian citizens, and her country's violent transformation into an Islamic state will provide valuable insights to anyone interested in current international events.
 
Signalé
Rasaily | 280 autres critiques | Jun 9, 2024 |
A memoir of life in Tehran under the Islamic Republic during the 1980s and 1990s from the point of view of a secular, liberal member of the intelligentsia.

Nafisi is a professor of English literature, and the best parts of the book are the scenes of Iranian students in the early days of the revolution, and later in Nafisi's private study group in the late 1990s, reacting to the novels she loves and teaches. The classroom "trial" of The Great Gatsby, in which an ardent Islamic revolutionary student condems the book as a part of the decadent and immoral West, while another student argues in defense of its moral value, was a high point. Nafisi's drawing of a parallel between Humbert's "pinning" of Lolita and forcing her to be the person of his own imagination and what Nafisi sees as a similar act by Khomeini and the Islamic Republic in forcing Iranians to conform to their fantasies of how people should behave also struck me as interesting.

But there was less of that than I would have thought, and more of Nafisi's own condemnations and rants against the Islamic regime and its supporters and how it all made her feel. And most of the book's scenes with her small private study group of women equally alienated from the regime is spent complaining about their lives and the government, rather than discussing literature. Though to be sure, they have plenty to complain about, no argument there.

The book is interesting and worth reading, but I do wish Nafisi could have toned down her obviously strong impulse to write about "how the Islamic Republic made me continually feel depressed" and concentrated somewhat more on the actual works of English literature and how her students responded to them in their particular, much different, society.

… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
lelandleslie | 280 autres critiques | Feb 24, 2024 |
Difficult subject to read about. Reading it in 2024 makes it feel a bit dated since it is gotten so much worse for women.
 
Signalé
kakadoo202 | 280 autres critiques | Feb 18, 2024 |

Listes

Prix et récompenses

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Auteurs associés

Statistiques

Œuvres
9
Aussi par
5
Membres
14,333
Popularité
#1,604
Évaluation
½ 3.6
Critiques
320
ISBN
117
Langues
15
Favoris
14

Tableaux et graphiques