Photo de l'auteur
2 oeuvres 42 utilisateurs 18 critiques

A propos de l'auteur

Gillian I. Leitch is an independent scholar and historical researcher and co-chair of the Science Fiction Fantasy Area of the PCA. She lives in Ottawa, Ontario.

Œuvres de Gillian I. Leitch

Étiqueté

Partage des connaissances

Date de naissance
20th century
Sexe
female
Nationalité
Canada

Membres

Critiques

Cette critique a été écrite dans le cadre des Critiques en avant-première de LibraryThing.
From the title, one would expect a book about the many companions who have traveled with the Doctor; unfortunately, the essays focus almost exclusively on "new Who".

In my opinion (for which I received a copy from Library Thing's Early Reviewers) the best essays were "Life Post-TARDIS? The Case for Jo Grant and Sarah Jane Smith" by Sherry Ginn and "A Muted Melody: The (Dis)Empowerment of River Song" by Tom Powers. Both were well-written, enjoyable reads and thoroughly annotated.

I am firmly in the "can't stand Rose" camp. Again, in my opinion, the best companions have been Sarah Jane Smith in "classic Who" and a tie between Donna Noble and River Song in "new Who". I would have enjoyed a book more focused on exploring each companion. I really would have enjoyed essays specifically about Tegan and Donna, in addition to what we got of Sarah Jane, Jo, and River.

I believe that Doctor Who enthusiasts will enjoy it regardless and feel that reading it was time well-spent.
… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
mitchma | 4 autres critiques | Feb 11, 2017 |
Cette critique a été écrite dans le cadre des Critiques en avant-première de LibraryThing.
This collection of pop-scholarly papers concerns itself with the "companion" characters in the half century of Doctor Who science fiction television. The majority of these are treatments that are principally preoccupied with gender. Several of them identify one or two companions for lengthy analysis. Such treatments are provided for Jo Grant, Sarah Jane Smith, Rose Tyler, Rory Williams, and River Song.

I think I best enjoyed the papers on outlier topics that concluded the volume: one on "companions who weren't" (i.e. Madame de Pompadour and Astrid Peth) and the other on companion characters in novels written during the inter-series hiatus of 1991-2005. In general, the papers concerned with the "classic" series seemed to be of a higher quality than those focused on the 21st-century episodes.

The authors are all academically credentialed, and clearly writing for an academic audience, despite often wearing their fandom on their sleeves. Each paper is endnoted, and there is a full reference bibliography. Hardcore fans may find some enjoyment here, but on the whole, the scholarly tone tends to dampen enthusiasm, while the pervasive tendency to hypostasize fantasy television characters creates a sense of misplaced priorities.
… (plus d'informations)
1 voter
Signalé
paradoxosalpha | 4 autres critiques | Dec 14, 2016 |
Cette critique a été écrite dans le cadre des Critiques en avant-première de LibraryThing.
Doctor Who has been on the landscape of sci-fi for more than 50 years now, with 13 Doctors and a plethora of companions, both male and female, alien and human. They are the viewer's window into understanding the self-described "mad man in a box" that travels throughout time and space.

These scholarly essays are a look at the companions in general and in particular. What makes them tick and how they fit into the story. What draws the Doctor to them, and how they inform the world of Doctor Who. These are not light reading, and often take a deep look into the psyche of the companions. If you're into writing fanfic or like to tear apart the world of Doctor Who and look for hidden secrets, this is for you.

I enjoyed the book and recommend it to people with a deep love of Doctor Who.
… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
anneb10 | 4 autres critiques | Dec 4, 2016 |
Cette critique a été écrite dans le cadre des Critiques en avant-première de LibraryThing.
I expected this to be a collection of lighthearted essays looking at each companion on their own. What I got instead was a critical analysis of the companion's role in the show, a look at how the companion's role has changed over time, and a combination of feminist theory and disability theory as well as other interesting approaches to the companions. Overall, a very interesting and intellectual look at the various companions and their history, function, and status.
 
Signalé
KarenRendall | 4 autres critiques | Nov 4, 2016 |

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Auteurs associés

Lynnette R. Porter Contributor
Paul Booth Contributor
Sherry Ginn Contributor
Racheline Maltese Contributor
Kristine Larsen Contributor
David Whitt Contributor
Andrew O'Day Contributor
J.M. Frey Contributor
Kieran Tranter Contributor
Lindsay Coleman Contributor
Kate Flynn Contributor
Aaron Gulyas Contributor
Maura Grady Contributor
Cassie Hemstrom Contributor
Andrew Crome Contributor

Statistiques

Œuvres
2
Membres
42
Popularité
#357,757
Évaluation
3.2
Critiques
18
ISBN
5