Michael J. Klarman

5761. From Jim Crow to Civil Rights The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality, by Michael J. Klarman (read 27 Oct 2021) This book, published in 2004, is a well researched book on events leading up to Brown v. Board of Education and an in depth study of the case in the Supreme Court (including a study of the notes of members of the Court, something rather unique and not often seen in studies of Supreme Court cases) and of the reaction to the unanimous Court decision. The Supreme Court left the working out of implementation of the decision to Federal district courts for years . The fierce reaction to the decision by the racists of the South is studied and it is satisfying that in time the case came to be accepted due to the good work of the Federal courts and the adverse reaction to the deplorable behavior of the opponents of the decision. The author's analysis of the reaction to the decision is penetratingly enlightening and better than I have ever seen before. This is a very satisfying study of the Brown case..… (plus d'informations)

To say that this book is detailed is a bit like calling the sun warm or a black hole poorly lit. Klarman (or Klarman's research associates) have read pretty much everything written by anyone important to the creation of the constitution, and have distilled it all down into one lengthy, exhausting book. Do you need to read this? I'd have to say no, unless you're doing research, or you're a junkie. For those two types of people, though, this is a goldmine: very well organized, convincing, and almost Walter Benjaminite in its willingness to tell an entire story through other people's words. It's not really that different from other interpretations, but it does give you all the evidence you'll ever need to show that the constitution and its makers probably aren't as great as everyone says.… (plus d'informations)

The drafting and ratification of the Constitution of the United States is one of the most heavily mythologized parts of American history. For many people, what happened in Philadelphia was nothing less than a divinely-inspired blueprint for a national government, with the wise men who created it lionized as the "Founding Fathers" with all of the majesty implied by the use of the capital letters. Though this image has not gone unchallenged, it's endurance reflects its patriotic usefulness, an example of the national exceptionalism of which Americans are so proud.

Michael Klarman's book offers a very different view of the creation of our nation's governing document. Drawing upon a vast range of contemporary writings, he argues that the creation of the Constitution was driven by fears for the effects of democracy on economic policy. The key concern was debt. During the American Revolution the states and the Continental Congress had accumulated an enormous amount of debt in their fight against the British. Though the United States had won the war, in its aftermath the country was plunged into a severe economic depression that exacerbated the economic problems of thousands of Americans. Pressured by high taxes to service the debts, voters in several states elected officials who pursued a variety of measures designed to ease tax burdens and make debts easier to pay off, many of which threatened to destabilize national unity.

It was concerns over this which Klarman sees as driving the push for a new national governing structure. As he explains, the government provided in the Articles of Confederation lacked authority to address the problem, and was itself virtually prostrate from the burden of debts and the lack of any reliable means of paying them off. For many of the people behind the push for a stronger national government, the heart of the problem lay with the disproportionate power possessed by the smaller states, which enjoyed equal representation in the Confederation Congress. It was this problem which James Madison's Virginia Plan sought to address by creating a new legislature with power residing in a lower house with representation apportioned by population. His efforts to bully the delegates from the smaller states failed, though, and after a compromise was reached establishing an upper legislative house that maintained the principal of equal state representation, the desire of Madison and his allies to empower the embryonic government waned considerably. It was a fortuitous failure, though because such were the concerns of many people about the final document that even with all of the advantages the Constituion's advocates possessed, ratification was a close-run thing, with the support of the smaller states (who never would have gone along with a structure that would have diminished their representation to the degree Madison proposed) decisive to its success.

Deeply researched and clearly argued, Klarman's book is a masterpiece of historical writing. While his argument echoes the one famously advanced by [a:Charles A. Beard|109323|Charles A. Beard|https://images.gr-assets.com/authors/1359049344p2/109323.jpg] in his book [b:An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States|187702|An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States|Charles A. Beard|https://i.gr-assets.com/images/S/compressed.photo.goodreads.com/books/1418788262l/187702._SY75_.jpg|181422], Klarman makes a more convincing case by nuancing his arguments in ways that acknowledges the complex range of factors involved. Contingency is at the heart of his tale, as he shows the interplay of arguments and how decisions played off of each other in ways that determined the outcome. It makes for an origin story for the Constitution that is more akin to the grimy details of sausage making than the high-minded debates of demigods, but it is one that is truer to the reality of politics than we would like to admit. For that reason alone it is essential reading for anyone interested in learning about the history of our country's founding or how our national government came to be what it is today.… (plus d'informations)

Every now and again it is helpful to read a history that reminds us what it was really like back in the day. The recent progress on LGBT equality can make us forget what we had to endure. While some (William Eskridge, I'm looking at you) insist we are going too fast, that we should push for change no quicker than the least tolerant of our society are willing to accept it, Klarman shows that more good than bad comes from insisting on fair treatment now.

This book is full of interesting tidbits. While he gets bogged down at points on rehearsing almost every poll that has ever been taking on same-sex marriage, the overall effect is thoughtful and enlightening. Even the weakest part of the book--when he attempts to predict what will happen after 2012--is still somewhat interesting in that he wasn't that far off.

[I had to lower the rating 1/2 star. I tried to follow up some of his claims through the references in his footnotes, but they are surprisingly poor and incomplete.]… (plus d'informations)