Photo de l'auteur
16 oeuvres 761 utilisateurs 6 critiques

A propos de l'auteur

John R. Lott, Jr., is the author of five books, including Freedonmomics and Are Predatory Commitments Credible? Who Should the Courts Believe? the latter also published by the University of Chicago Press.

Œuvres de John R. Lott Jr.

Étiqueté

Partage des connaissances

Sexe
male
Nationalité
USA
Professions
Statistician
author

Membres

Critiques

This was published in the wake of Freakonomics, which explains the dumbish title and the book's intent. The thesis is that (a) the free market offers better solutions to a whole range of problems and (b) the often forgotten/ignored fact about subsidizing bad behavior leads to bad things. The first and second chapter talks about businesses in the free market and reputations. The third chapter talks about the problems with government solutions and government interference in the markets. The fourth chapter speaks about crime and punishment (the death penalty and more guns works, gun control doesn't, and broken windows is inconclusive). The fifth chapter talks about voting rights and wrongs. These are bookended by an introduction and conclusion. Freakonomics and some of its theories are directly addressed several time, like Lott's demolition of the argument that the legalization of abortion in the 1970s led to the crime reduction of the 1990s. Et cetera. A quick, breezy read; footnoted; sparse tables and graphs. If you're inclined to agree with free market principles you'll like it, if you're inclined against the free market you will think it's hogwash. I thought Freakonomics was a whole lot of hogwash. Some good examples and personal stories, though the ones in Freakonomics are more engaging. Still, a good book, though now (2021) a bit dated in its 2000 to 2007 focus and issues. I had forgotten all about ACORN, for instance. Oh, the Bush years....… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
tuckerresearch | 2 autres critiques | Jan 12, 2022 |
A solid overview of statistical arguments that "gun bans" and similar measures aren't necessary, aren't effective, and are inherently discriminatory or otherwise wrong. Unfortunately, Lott misses a lot of chances to identify problems which actually could be solved in some other ways (rather than as gun bans), merely asserting (and providing pretty strong data to support) that gun bans are ineffective ways to address those problems.
 
Signalé
octal | Jan 1, 2021 |
Big donors "allegedly" buy influence through campaign contribution? Allegedly?! What a crock of shite.

Does raise some interesting issues about unintended consequences of regulation that others fear to discuss.
 
Signalé
Paul_S | 2 autres critiques | Dec 23, 2020 |
I recommend reading this along with "Freakonomics" by Steven D. Levitt & Stephen J. Dubner -- they give somewhat opposing viewpoints on these topics.
 
Signalé
SaraMSLIS | 2 autres critiques | Jan 26, 2016 |

Listes

Prix et récompenses

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Statistiques

Œuvres
16
Membres
761
Popularité
#33,429
Évaluation
3.9
Critiques
6
ISBN
41
Langues
2

Tableaux et graphiques