Seth G. Jones
Auteur de In the Graveyard of Empires: America's War in Afghanistan
A propos de l'auteur
Seth G. Jones is Harold Brown Chair and Director of the Transnational Threats Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), as well as an adjunct professor at Johns Hopkins University's School for Advanced International Studies (SAIS). He is the author of In the Graveyard of afficher plus Empires: America's War in Afghanistan. afficher moins
Œuvres de Seth G. Jones
Counterinsurgency in Afghanistan: RAND Counterinsurgency Study-, (2008) (Volume 4) (2008) 12 exemplaires
Cute Animals: 50 Cute and Funny Animals That Will Make You Smile (Cute Animals, funny animals, animal designs) 3 exemplaires
Counterterrorism and counterinsurgency in Somalia : assessing the campaign against Al Shabaab (2016) 2 exemplaires
Russia’s Corporate Soldiers: The Global Expansion of Russia’s Private Military Companies (CSIS Reports) (2021) 2 exemplaires
Re-Examining the Al Qa’ida Threat to the United States. Testimony presented before the House Foreign Affairs… 1 exemplaire
Afganistán ¿el Iraq de Obama? 1 exemplaire
Étiqueté
Partage des connaissances
- Date de naissance
- 1972-10-02
- Sexe
- male
- Nationalité
- USA
- Études
- University of Chicago
Bowdoin College - Professions
- political scientist
international security analyst
plans officer - Organisations
- RAND Corporation
International Security and Defense Policy Center
Johns Hopkins University
U.S. Special Operations Command
U.S. Special Operations Forces
United States Naval Postgraduate School
Membres
Critiques
Prix et récompenses
Vous aimerez peut-être aussi
Auteurs associés
Statistiques
- Œuvres
- 23
- Membres
- 490
- Popularité
- #50,416
- Évaluation
- 3.8
- Critiques
- 9
- ISBN
- 78
- Langues
- 1
So for all means and purposes nothing new - same old thing, major powers extending their sphere of influence and smaller countries paying the price, only difference being that today not anyone is allowed into this club any more (unless they hold the rest of the world by the short and curlies because rest of the world moved all strategic industry to their territory - in which case, let 'em play).
Authors (it is a group of authors involved with the book) have an approach that very easily translates to old Roman speech ending every so often with "And Carthage needs to to be destroyed" that it becomes ridiculous.
So in order of things.....
Good: Presentation of Russian PMC roles, their successes and blunders are short but to a point (this is after all 100-something page booklet). Approach used by PMCs, tasks they were given and how they managed to execute them (or completely mess things up as in Mozambique) are given very clearly. Relationships to the Russian state and security are also given in rather good detail.
Bad: Insistence on how Russian PMC work closely with Russian state (ominous music!). As far as I can see only truly apolitical (at least considering the fire it drew to itself) PMC outfit was South African Executive Outcomes because they played for the money and concessions - but they did their job. And due to their rather apolitical approach where highly criticized and [if I may say] forced to disband. Author talks about these links between PMCs and state government as if he never heard of East Indian Company, Sandline Intl, Keenie-Meenie (KMS), David Sterling's PMC (Aden anybody?), Bob Denard (and that same Madagascar and Africa) and as we come to current times Blackwater/Academy/, Triple Canopy, UAE army ran by Aussies etc. They are just patriots running businesses - right :D yeah, right :) MPRI on its own trained a whole army and guide it through very advanced reconnaissance methods to achieve the effect it achieved - happened by chance right ;) I mean ridiculous, very contracts with these PMCs were made through US DOD.
Funny: Russian PMCs only exist so that Russian oligarchs and certain individuals (ominous music!) get richer. I get Prince never took any money for Blackwater engagements, or EO, or Triple Canopy..... they shared their wealth with their immediate neighbors and communities :D:D:D I mean come on...... I am still trying to figure out what did authors meant with this....
Interesting: Years of pandemic and forced isolation... it seems they weren't inactive years as much as we might think. After seeing 2020 and 2021 mentioned so much in relation to various active battlefields from Africa to Europe to Asia truly makes one wander what did take place during those years.
Not so funny:Authors are not very clear how they see the Russian PMCs (effective, not, maybe, not sure) but final thoughts on creating friction and conflict on Russian end that might cause internal conflict with possibly catastrophic consequences for Russia (I have to admit that seeing Mark Galleotti quoted here was not a surprise, unfortunately) is a little bit to aggressive for any publication. Which explains why this book is not possible to found anywhere anymore - it just went swoosh! Gone! Level of response authors advise is very very confrontational and is something that should not be publicly written about IMHO. But this just speaks of general feelings and complete lost of touch with reality and what was usually called realpolitik. Unfortunately it brought the world into the situation it is in today.
Bloody ridiculous:Constant insistence on meddling with the 2016 and (what struck me the most) 2020 (!!!!) elections. This and constant talks about Russian "hybrid war" are so ludicrous and hilarious (no pun intended) statements that are today even ridiculed officially by mass-media I dont understand why did they even mentioned this in the book (I guess it will take few more years for authors/experts to acknowledge this though because hey this is gold mine with shady/gray kinetic appliances that need to be discussed and since it is a new main buzzword it needs o be milked to the max). Again authors' mentioning of "hybrid war" as something so new it is unbelievable - maybe reading books on (heh) election meddling in Italy, Iran to prevent communists (ominous music!) to get to power, then Angola, Congo, South Africa wars and Vlaakplaas (in 1990's hype was about the Third Force!), Asian wars (Laos, Cambodia, Vietnam), Latin America (Cuba, Argentina, Chile, Nicaragua, Operation Condor anyone) and do we need to mention Algeir and Iran in 1950's, Czech Revolt, Hungary........ only thing that changed is possibility to launch the missile from the remote command post and be safe from returning fire. This insistence on "hybrid war" gotta stop - it is just a way of using overwhelming effect to stupefy your enemy, and as can be seen above it is not Russia-only domain (as a matter of fact they are kind-of-a new kids under the spotlight in this category - everybody else screaming "hybrid war" has been waging it for at least five decades). I have to say use of the buzzwords irritate me beyond belief.
So as can be seen book has everything to make it an interesting read. I cannot but think that it was published to the public by mistake, especially considering the recommendations that are poised more against the Russia than their PMCs.
What comes out of this book is that Russian PMCs have struck the cord through their actions and resulting vibrations caused authors to call for retaliatory strike that is [to say the least] out of proportion and sounds very very much ominous and belligerent. From the conclusions I can only say that they are made sensational and with not much understanding of the opponent (which is the way Russia and Russian PMCs are seen by the authors). Which again, in light of this year's events, unfortunately does not surprise me at all. Authors seem to see themselves as Catos of our time - I hope they are more reasonable than that.
Interesting book, highly recommended, especially today.… (plus d'informations)