D. Edmond Hiebert (1910–1995)
Auteur de James
A propos de l'auteur
Crédit image: Direction Journal
Œuvres de D. Edmond Hiebert
An Introduction to the New Testament, Vol. 3: The Non-Pauline Epistles and Revelation (1962) 199 exemplaires
THE THESSALONIAN EPISTLES 2 exemplaires
The Thessalonian letters: Words of comfort and messages of hope (A Moody correspondence course) (1973) 2 exemplaires
2 Peter & Jude 1 exemplaire
Hiebert, D. Edmond 1 exemplaire
Epistles of John 1 exemplaire
Everyman’s Bible Company momentary (Second Timothy) 1 exemplaire
Introduction to the New Testament V. 3 1 exemplaire
Introduction to the New Testament V. 2 1 exemplaire
Called to teach 1 exemplaire
رسائل يوحنا: شرح تفسيري 1 exemplaire
Oeuvres associées
The Expositor's Bible Commentary: Ephesians through Philemon (1978) — Contributeur, quelques éditions — 1,167 exemplaires
Étiqueté
Partage des connaissances
- Nom légal
- Hiebert, David Edmond
- Autres noms
- Hiebert, D. Edmond
- Date de naissance
- 1910-07-27
- Date de décès
- 1995-01-30
- Sexe
- male
- Nationalité
- USA
- Lieu de naissance
- Corn, Oklahoma, USA
- Lieu du décès
- Fresno, California, USA
- Lieux de résidence
- Fresno, California, USA
- Études
- Southern Baptist Theological Seminary (ThM|1939, ThD|1942)
- Organisations
- Evangelical Theological Society
Membres
Critiques
Introduction to the Non-Pauline Epistles par D. Edmond Hiebert
Dr. Hiebert deals lucidly and accurately with the background and content of the Epistles of Peter, James, John, Jude and the letter the Hebrews.
The author discusses the Pauline Epistles historical circumstances of their writing, deals with critical problems, and provides helpful general information on the content and nature of the books themselves.
In my mind, Hiebert oftens overplays the Greek (tenses especially) to give a meaning that he is happy with. Overall, however, he does a good job of laying out the text. He does not go into great detail about various interpretive issues. When there is a difficulty, he may or may not mention all the options, but he does choose one, often without in depth analysis as to why. His work is well footnoted, though, and further study is not hard to find for those who are looking. Not my favorite commentary of James, but not my least either. For someone looking for an introductory look at the issues and text, this will do ok.… (plus d'informations)
In my mind, Hiebert oftens overplays the Greek (tenses especially) to give a meaning that he is happy with. Overall, however, he does a good job of laying out the text. He does not go into great detail about various interpretive issues. When there is a difficulty, he may or may not mention all the options, but he does choose one, often without in depth analysis as to why. His work is well footnoted, though, and further study is not hard to find for those who are looking. Not my favorite commentary of James, but not my least either. For someone looking for an introductory look at the issues and text, this will do ok.… (plus d'informations)
Vous aimerez peut-être aussi
Statistiques
- Œuvres
- 35
- Aussi par
- 1
- Membres
- 2,851
- Popularité
- #9,004
- Évaluation
- 3.3
- Critiques
- 12
- ISBN
- 43
- Langues
- 2
- Favoris
- 1