D. D. Guttenplan
Auteur de The Holocaust on Trial
A propos de l'auteur
D. D. Guttenplan, journalist and essayist, lives in London.
Œuvres de D. D. Guttenplan
The Next Republic: The Rise of a New Radical Majority 2 exemplaires
Once Off 1 exemplaire
Oeuvres associées
Granta 2: George Steiner, The Portage to San Cristobal of A.H. (1980) — Contributeur — 36 exemplaires
Étiqueté
Partage des connaissances
- Nom légal
- Guttenplan, Don David
- Date de naissance
- 1957-07-12
- Sexe
- male
- Nationalité
- USA
- Lieu de naissance
- Portsmouth, Virginia, USA
- Études
- Columbia College (BA)
Cambridge University (Clare College) (BA)
University of London (PhD) - Organisations
- The Nation
National Union of Journalists
American Historical Association
Friends of Music at Guilford
Membres
Critiques
Processo all'Olocausto par D. D. Guttemplan
L'11 gennaio 2000, di fronte alla Royal Court di Londra, inizia il processo che vede protagonisti lo storico revisionista David Irving contro la ricercatrice americana Deborah Lipstadt, accusata di averlo calunniato. La causa si trasforma presto in un processo sul genocidio. (fonte: Google Books)
Update - Re-read in 2016. Love Guttenplan's even handedness and analysis about the issues. Honesty, this is a really good overview of the trial.
This book is about the Irving vs. Penguin/Lipstadt trial, but unlike Evans, this account is written from an outsider’s point of view. This allows the reader to have both a look at all the sides and the way the wheels of the trial were moving. It is reporting in the sense of the word with a look at what should be done if anything about denial, and placing the trial in content for a non-participate. And while it doesn’t answer the question it raises, it does raise an important one. Lipstadt was sued because the libel laws in England are not as favorable to the writer as they are in say America. But it also allows for the voicing of hateful and hurtful words. That whole sticks and stone rhyme, bullshit. Complete and other bullshit. Nothing hurts more than words.… (plus d'informations)
This book is about the Irving vs. Penguin/Lipstadt trial, but unlike Evans, this account is written from an outsider’s point of view. This allows the reader to have both a look at all the sides and the way the wheels of the trial were moving. It is reporting in the sense of the word with a look at what should be done if anything about denial, and placing the trial in content for a non-participate. And while it doesn’t answer the question it raises, it does raise an important one. Lipstadt was sued because the libel laws in England are not as favorable to the writer as they are in say America. But it also allows for the voicing of hateful and hurtful words. That whole sticks and stone rhyme, bullshit. Complete and other bullshit. Nothing hurts more than words.… (plus d'informations)
Introduction is a superior essay on What We Think We Know.
Vous aimerez peut-être aussi
Auteurs associés
Statistiques
- Œuvres
- 6
- Aussi par
- 2
- Membres
- 226
- Popularité
- #99,470
- Évaluation
- 3.6
- Critiques
- 6
- ISBN
- 18
- Langues
- 3