Photo de l'auteur
10 oeuvres 394 utilisateurs 7 critiques

A propos de l'auteur

Comprend les noms: Floyd E. Randall

Œuvres de E. Randall Floyd

Étiqueté

Partage des connaissances

Date de naissance
1947-08-12
Sexe
male
Nationalité
USA
Lieux de résidence
Augusta, Georgia, USA
Études
Valdosta State University
Professions
columnist
professor

Membres

Critiques

There is nothing wrong with this book, per se. It has been sitting on the nightstand, partially read for about a year and half. Many other books have been started and finished, while this book, for whatever reason doesn't beg my attention as a reader.
 
Signalé
MrsBond | 4 autres critiques | Jun 27, 2023 |
The cover attracted me and it ended up being more interesting than what was inside. Can a book be both boring & disturbing at the same time? This was. I hate when history-themed books disappoint me but this one definitely did.
 
Signalé
DanHelfer | 4 autres critiques | Dec 29, 2022 |
This book was not good.

I hate to admit it, but maybe there was a reason (as Dusty tole me) that the book was in the bargin bin at Barnes and Noble.

I was really drawn to this book because I like to learn about people in history. But Floyd was too broad and too general. In the introduction, he said he would be, but even with his own warning, I found myself feeling something was missing.

The organization of a book also contributes to how well it reads. And Floyd failed terribly on this count. It it organized alphabetically...and I found myself jumping from 1700s to the 1930s, then to the 1860s...it would have been MUCH easier for me to read if it were chronological...… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
csweder | 4 autres critiques | Jul 8, 2014 |
This book was not good.

I hate to admit it, but maybe there was a reason (as Dusty tole me) that the book was in the bargin bin at Barnes and Noble.

I was really drawn to this book because I like to learn about people in history. But Floyd was too broad and too general. In the introduction, he said he would be, but even with his own warning, I found myself feeling something was missing.

The organization of a book also contributes to how well it reads. And Floyd failed terribly on this count. It it organized alphabetically...and I found myself jumping from 1700s to the 1930s, then to the 1860s...it would have been MUCH easier for me to read if it were chronological...… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
csweder | 4 autres critiques | Jul 8, 2014 |

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Statistiques

Œuvres
10
Membres
394
Popularité
#61,534
Évaluation
½ 3.4
Critiques
7
ISBN
17

Tableaux et graphiques