Photo de l'auteur

Joseph Farah

Auteur de Taking America Back

7 oeuvres 90 utilisateurs 3 critiques

A propos de l'auteur

Joseph Farah is the editor, cofounder, and chief executive officer of WorldNetDaily.com

Œuvres de Joseph Farah

Étiqueté

Partage des connaissances

Il n’existe pas encore de données Common Knowledge pour cet auteur. Vous pouvez aider.

Membres

Critiques

Joseph Farah is a weird guy. The editor of the conspiracy-ridden and schlocky WorldNetDaily news website, he makes it very clear that he was the first to the tea party. He intended this book to be a corrective to trends within the Tea Party which have been pushing towards issues-based politics rather than an ideological 'revolution'. It's very short, and very repetitive, but engaging and clear in its messaging.

While not as compelling or powerful a writer as fellow demagogue Glenn Beck, Farah's book employs similar tactics in its emphasis on a number of simply-put, key points. He has both warnings and praise for the Tea Party. Summed up - the Tea Party has far outgrown the modern conservative movement that preceded it, and needs to push forward as a united front around God and the Constitution.

This is pretty heavy material to take on in a short book, and the author doesn't quite accomplish his attempt at a rallying cry. For example, God is one of the cornerstones of his concept of the Tea Party. God is the higher power to which people are accountable, transcending worldly authorities such as the government. That's all well and good - it's a common argument, and actually similar to arguments used by Islamic revivalists for why Muslims should rebel against secular dictatorships.

However, Farah is making a conscious appeal to atheists as part of the Tea Party alliance. Why should atheists support a God-based political movement? Apparently because some of the atheists among the Founding Fathers sucked it up and supported the Constitution, which was apparently a religious document. While this point is not very accurate, it also seemed like an extremely weak sell for that kind of audience.

Outside of the main arguments, you do get a taste of Farah's somewhat bizarre political thoughts. Perhaps it's because I'm anarchist, or because I haven't read very much conservative literature or have much interaction with very conservative people, but there were some arguments that didn't quite make sense. For example, this is his political spectrum:

Communism - fascism - liberalism/"soft socialism" - tea-party conservativism/"centerism" - libertarianism - anarchism

In this spectrum, Communism = total government and anarchism = no government, with a range of degrees in between. While that's not wrong, it's an odd re-framing of the issue, especially in claiming that anarchy is, in fact, a rightist ideology.

This book was not a worthwhile read for me. If you're looking to become more educated about the Tea Party from its own perspectives, pass over this book.
… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
2dgirlsrule | 1 autre critique | Jul 12, 2020 |
In his manifesto, World Net Daily Founder Joseph Farah encourages Tea Partiers to unite, not around leaders but around the principles of the Declarations of Independence and the US Constitution. He calls for citizens to center the debate around our founding documents and principles and work toward holding an out of control government to its Constitutional limitations. He argues that that these principles, not party loyalty, are the core upon which Americans can unify and begin to take back control of our Republic. The manifesto is a brief and well laid out book that spell out a course of action in a concise, easy to understand way. It is a good read for anyone concerned about the future of our great nation.… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
fschipani | 1 autre critique | Aug 27, 2010 |
“The most successful politicians recognize the state of the nation and play to it. You want a nanny? The politician will be your nanny. You want a daddy? The politician will be your daddy. You want a big brother? The politician will be only too happy to be Big Brother.
America—you don’t need or want any of those things. Instead, you need to get off your fat, pampered butts and take care of yourselves. You need to reject government “help” altogether. Stop turning from tweedle-dee to tweedle-dum and expect anything to change. No presidential candidate is going to save you.
Govern yourself.”

This quote from Joseph Farah’s None of the Above, Why 2008 is the Year to Cast the Ultimate Protest Vote, sums up my own feelings about the direction of our government and the upcoming election. Like many, I’ve been unhappy with the choices offered to us voters in the past. I’ve done the “plug my nose and vote for the lesser of two evils” ballot. In the primary here in California this spring, the field was pretty limited by the time the elections arrived. My original choice was, of course, long gone. For the first time, in over 30 years of voting, I found myself with nobody to support in the primary. However, I had such an aversion to the frontrunner I found myself voting for a candidate I actively disliked, disapproved of and would have never voted for in the general election. I regretted it as soon as I finished casting the ballot. I’ve always, and I mean always, taken voting very seriously; read up on the candidates, and supported who I felt the best person for the job would be. I promised myself that I’d never vote for someone again, unless I believed they were the best we had to offer.

Farah’s book caught my eye with the title; since that’s just the way I’ve been feeling about the upcoming election. The book addresses the authors’ belief that now is the time for radical and revolutionary thinking. That when we chose “the lesser of two evils”, this means that we are still participating in something “evil”. Farah reminds us that we won’t get the Constitutional government our founding fathers fought for, if we don’t demand it. The Constitution of our country is an amazing document, but we’ve allowed all three branches of government to gut it and render it irrelevant. Patrick Henry said, “The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government - lest it come to dominate our lives and interests.” This document was to limit the power that government had over our lives, not allow it to be our nanny. We were to be self-governing, and yet we’ve allowed ourselves to be convinced that all our dreams can come true if we put our faith in our leaders. As Farah says, “dependency of government is the opposite of freedom and responsibility. In the long term, it means tyranny and slavery.”

None of the Above makes compelling arguments, which any American can readily understand. The authors love of this country and the freedoms enumerated in the Constitution are obviously of the utmost importance to him. Farah also is a Christian, and his faith is an integral part of his thesis. He uses Biblical reference throughout and refers often to his own beliefs. This type of theologically driven ideology may detract from his thesis in the minds of some readers. It might be easier for a reader who has a different or no religious background to discount the book as a whole, instead of realizing that the ideas contained within the book are relevant to all Americans, religious or not. I don’t necessarily agree with all of Farah’s idea, I find I have a more of a Libertarian perspective on many social issues. However when it comes to protecting the Constitution, I’m with him 100%. We have to stop taking it for granted.
Joseph Farah’s book reminds us that, “The strength of the Constitution lies entirely in the determination of each citizen to defend it. Only if every single citizen feels duty bound to do his share in this defense are the constitutional rights secure.” (Albert Einstein)
… (plus d'informations)
½
 
Signalé
NovelBookworm | Aug 20, 2008 |

Listes

Statistiques

Œuvres
7
Membres
90
Popularité
#205,795
Évaluation
3.1
Critiques
3
ISBN
20

Tableaux et graphiques