Photo de l'auteur

Bernard Dixon (1938–2020)

Auteur de Power Unseen: How microbes rule the world

23+ oeuvres 266 utilisateurs 3 critiques

A propos de l'auteur

Trained as a microbiologist, Bernard Dixon has for many years been a science writer, editor, and consultant. He edited the British weekly New Scientist from 1969 to 1979 and now writes regularly for Lancet Infectious Diseases and Current Biology as well as Microbe. He holds an honorary D.Sc. from afficher plus the University of Edinburgh for his contributions to public debate on scientific issues, and he was appointed an OBE for services to science journalism. He has received the Charter Award of the Institute of Biology, and in 2002 he shared with Steven Rose the Biochemical Society Award "for science communication in the public domain." His previous books include Power Unseen: How Microbes Rule the World, Beyond the Magic Bullet, Magnificent Microbes, and What Is Science For? As well as editing the journal Medical Science Research for 10 years, Dixon has served as European editor for Bio/Technology (now Nature Biotechnology). He has been a member of the board of the Edinburgh International Science Festival and the European Federation of Biotechnology's Task Group on Public Perceptions of Biotechnology. He teaches courses on science communication for bodies ranging from Cancer Research UK to the Universities of Oxford and St Andrews. afficher moins

Comprend les noms: Bernard Dixon, Bernard Dixon

Œuvres de Bernard Dixon

Oeuvres associées

Omni Magazine April 1982 (1982) — Contributeur — 2 exemplaires
New Scientist, 29 August 1968 (1968) — Contributeur — 1 exemplaire
New Scientist, 26 January 1978 (1978) — Reviewer — 1 exemplaire
New Scientist, 21 December 1967 (1967) — Contributeur — 1 exemplaire
New Scientist, 21 September 1967 (1967) — Contributeur — 1 exemplaire

Étiqueté

Partage des connaissances

Autres noms
Dixon, Dr Bernard
Date de naissance
1938-07-17
Date de décès
2020-10-30
Sexe
male
Nationalité
UK
Professions
science writer
editor
Organisations
The New Scientist
Prix et distinctions
Healthwatch Award (1999)

Membres

Critiques

Mixed bag. Starting with the title: why "creation"? what's the got to do with science? some notable omissions such as R. Feynman, Sir j Jeans, Carl Sagan. But worse the inclusions are distinctly odd. Wallace's piece struggling surreptitiously to bring God back into the story, a piece written for kids which is hardly classic, from HG Wellls an autobiographical sketch which is amusing but not really science. should really be subtitled "byways in science writing".
 
Signalé
vguy | 1 autre critique | Feb 16, 2021 |
A collection of science writings from the seventeenth century to the twentieth. The goal of the editor is to counter the idea that scientists can't write, and that their prose is flat and dull. Some of his selections succeed; others not so much. Overall, it's a mixed bag, and I found some of his choices peculiar. For instance, for Charles Darwin he didn't include anything from Origin, in spite of the fact that one of the most beautiful pieces of science writing ever is the concluding paragraphs to that book; he chose a relatively dull portion of his autobiography instead. Some of the pieces were quite short; those were in many ways the best pieces. There were a few that were way too long, and not particularly interesting. He includes Colin Tudge, who has done some wonderful writing on natural history, so why did he give us a selection on nutrition? Strange. Still, there are some decent pieces in here, and if you want, you can always pick and choose, rather than reading all of them.… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
Devil_llama | 1 autre critique | May 26, 2014 |
This book falls into three parts: a review of the history of medicine, the areas where the prevailing philosophy of try to find a drug for each ill starts to break down and a look at the problems of the developing world. The first part was an excellent potted history, if you are happy to focus on infectious disease, the second thought provoking (given that it was written over thirty years ago but the criticisms and suggestions still seem current) and the third, a bit more optimistic in the sense that there seems to have been more progress that with the previous part.… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
edrandrew | Dec 3, 2011 |

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Auteurs associés

Statistiques

Œuvres
23
Aussi par
5
Membres
266
Popularité
#86,736
Évaluation
½ 3.4
Critiques
3
ISBN
52
Langues
6

Tableaux et graphiques