Peter Caddick-Adams

A worthy conclusion to an excellent trilogy, as first, Caddick-Adams presents a coherent operational portrait of the last 100 days of World War II in Northwest Europe. This book would be worthwhile for that if nothing else.

Two, the man continues his mission to debunk some of the "just so" stories that have come down from the war. These include such matters as the agendas and plans relating to crossing the Rhine into Germany, the trade-offs between the reduction of the Ruhr Pocket and the Western allies trying to grab Berlin from the Soviets, the murky story of Anglo-American and Soviet encounters along the Oder River, and the command stresses in ETO as the endgame finally became apparent.

Third and finally, Caddick-Adams devotes a great deal of time to the Allies coming into direct contact with the Nazi economy of forced labor and genocide, and how that radicalized and supercharged a slightly flagging effort; no one who encountered the death camps needed to have any further explanation of what they were fighting for.

I still think the man's book about D-Day and Normandy is the best portion of the lot, but one could do a lot worse than tackling this trilogy.… (plus d'informations)

The book covers from the preparations of D-Day 2 years prior and even a little further back covering the development of the landing plan, to D-Day and the weeks after. Caddick-Adams put together the narrative through interviews, soldier letters home to loved ones and military papers from WWII that have finally been released over the past decade. For me it was a tremendous learning experience from all the planning, practices, decisions to the landing and the weeks that followed (e.g. I didn't know that more people died in the 18 months practicing for D-Day than did on D-Day itself). He also does a post mortem at the end analyzing the impact of double agents, German decision tree impact and the weather. He answers questions like why was the Canadian impact so under stated in movies (Longest Day) and documents. I believe it is the definitive book on D-Day. On the negative it is a very long haul to get through. Building facts through letters and writings to demonstrate his finding, though very tedious would leave his theories lacking merit without the documented evidence he collected. What does become obvious is that although the Allies put in tremendous effort to prepare for D-Day (almost 2 years of practices on the beaches of England and Scotland!), in the end an awful lot of very fortunate luck did help in their success. This is not to say they would've failed without all the breaks, but it certainly would've cost many more lives than it already had.… (plus d'informations)

I have often said to friends that there are great historians and great writers and occasionally someone who is both and when you find one of those you have a keeper. Peter Caddick-Adams is one of these rare unicorns which he so clearly demonstrates in the last book of his Trilogy on the Western European Theater.

Fire and Steel: The End of World War II in the West is a 5 star read which focuses on the under studied and read on post Battle of the Bulge period, which includes the breaching of the West Wall, the crossing of the Rhine and the final advance on and surrender of German Forces.

Adams is great at painting the big picture while never losing sight of the small unit and individual contributors to the Allied Victory in Europe and winds up the book on the post war careers of key senior Allied Leadership.… (plus d'informations)

While I had been highly impressed with the author's book on the Ardennes Offensive, when I looked at this hunk of processed wood pulp I'll admit wondering whether I even wanted to get stuck in. However, I did persevere and can recommend it with very few reservations. One thing that has to be kept in mind is that this is a narrower book than it looks, with about half of the book devoted to the preparation for D-Day, and the other half devoted to D-Day itself. If you're interested in the conduct of the war after 6/6/1944 you'll be disappointed.

As for Caddick-Adams' mission, much of it relates to examining, and in a lot cases debunking, the myths that were created by Cornelius Ryan's "The Longest Day" (both the book and the film), and Steven Spielberg's "Saving Private Ryan." From there, there is also an effort to put the experiences of the other assault beaches into perspective, as the epic desperation experienced on "Omaha" beach tends to suck all the oxygen out of the room. In particular, this means playing up the Canadian experience on "Juno" Beach, and critically examining whether the British forces on "Sword" beach really had a chance to grab Caen. In the second case, the author has to conclude that while Bernard Montgomery may have had daydreams about grabbing the French town, he wasn't prepared to admit that the resources just weren't there to enable the mission to be accomplished; it should be noted that Caddick-Adams is not a great admirer of the field marshal.

One could go on and on about the all the small, but, salient matters that the author makes note of, from the experiences of the German make-weight battalions recruited from their POW camps, to the impact of the clockwork Allied invasion plan, to how the dicey weather inflicted havoc on the small land craft and amphibious vehicles, to squarely facing the mediocrity of the (for the most part) German anti-invasion plan. Still, at the end of the day, Caddick-Adams has to conclude that it was fortunate that June 6 was chosen as "the day" and that Eisenhower deserves all the credit in the world for having the moral courage to pull the trigger.

Highly recommended.… (plus d'informations)