Photo de l'auteur

Andrew Breitbart (1969–2012)

Auteur de Righteous Indignation: Excuse Me While I Save the World!

3 oeuvres 295 utilisateurs 10 critiques

A propos de l'auteur

Andrew Breitbart was born on February 1, 1969. He earned a B.A. in American studies from Tulane University in 1991. He became a conservative blogger and journalist. He ran his own news aggregation site, Breitbart.com, and five other websites: Breitbart.tv, Big Hollywood, Big Government, Big afficher plus Journalism, and Big Peace. He played key roles in the Anthony Weiner sexting scandal, the resignation of Shirley Sherrod, and the ACORN 2009 undercover videos controversy. He wrote two books: Righteous Indignation: Excuse Me While I Save the World and Hollywood, Interrupted: Insanity Chic in Bablyon - the Case Against Celebrity. He died of natural causes on March 1, 2012 at the age of 43. (Bowker Author Biography) afficher moins

Comprend les noms: Andrew Breitbart

Crédit image: Andrew Breitbart speaking at CPAC in Washington D.C. on February 10, 2012. By Gage Skidmore, CC BY-SA 3.0, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=18384494

Œuvres de Andrew Breitbart

Étiqueté

Partage des connaissances

Date de naissance
1969-02
Date de décès
2012-03
Sexe
male
Nationalité
USA
Lieux de résidence
Los Angeles, California, USA
Études
Tulane University
Organisations
Drudge Report
Breitbart.com

Membres

Critiques

I had a lot of preconceived notions about Breitbart (that he was an illiterate troll, boring, etc.); I'm not sure if it's that the state of political discourse in America has gotten dramatically worse over the past few years, or if I was just wrong, but he actually seems like a fairly interesting and sympathetic figure, at least based on his autobiography. I can only wonder what politics would be like today if he were still with us.
 
Signalé
octal | 8 autres critiques | Jan 1, 2021 |

The good:

* some real enthusiasm is good
* he's right: The MSM is fucked
* the Tea Party (while not my thing) (1) has been dishonestly slandered (2) is a political phenomena
* good on Andrew for what he did, before suddenly dying at 43 of natural causes a heart attack
* some of this book is a BLAST. Really.

The bad:

* he really claims that the Democrat Party are "hard left"
* makes a big thing about truth . . . except of course attacks 911 Truth and any truth about american wars
* George W Bush was "the great unifier"
* sees "the left" as one pure, uniform whole, with no possibility of variation between any two "left" people.
* absolutely and completely blind to the nearly limitless corruption of the USA corporatist right.
* dismisses as a joke any mention of the Koch brothers' clear, fundamental and necessary support of the Tea Party movement
* lives to attack "the left" but is apoplectic when the corrupt left attack him.

My feeling is that Andrew was not, really, that bright or clever. He had his platform and lots of real criminals and parasites to attack. But he couldn't see outside his rabbit hole: no sensitivity to the larger issues at all.. . .

. . . and the book did kinda tire, between his successive media and social stunts.
… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
GirlMeetsTractor | 8 autres critiques | Mar 22, 2020 |

Prix et récompenses

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Auteurs associés

Statistiques

Œuvres
3
Membres
295
Popularité
#79,435
Évaluation
3.8
Critiques
10
ISBN
13

Tableaux et graphiques