Photo de l'auteur
28+ oeuvres 562 utilisateurs 2 critiques 1 Favoris

A propos de l'auteur

Eva Brann is a member of the senior faculty at St. John's College in Annapolis, Maryland, where she has taught for more than sixty years. She holds degrees from Brooklyn College and Yale University and is a recipient of the National Humanities Medal. Feigning is her thirteenth book from Paul Dry afficher plus Books. Her other books include Pursuits of Happiness, Iron Filings or Scribblings, How to Constitute a World, Doublethink / Doubletalk, Then Now, Un-Willing, The Logos of Heraclitus, Feeling Our Feelings, Homage to Americans, Open Secrets / Inward Prospects, The Music of the Republic, and Homeric Moments. afficher moins

Comprend les noms: Eva Brann, Eva Brann

Œuvres de Eva Brann

The Logos of Heraclitus (2011) 42 exemplaires
What, Then, Is Time? (1999) 30 exemplaires
The Ways of Naysaying (2001) 9 exemplaires

Oeuvres associées

Greek Mathematical Thought and the Origin of Algebra (1968) — Traducteur, quelques éditions146 exemplaires
Essays on the Closing of the American Mind (1989) — Contributeur — 24 exemplaires
Retracing the Platonic Text (1999) — Contributeur — 9 exemplaires

Étiqueté

Partage des connaissances

Nom canonique
Brann, Eva
Nom légal
Brann, Eva T. H.
Date de naissance
1929
Sexe
female
Nationalité
Germany (birth)
USA (naturalized)
Lieu de naissance
Berlin, Germany
Lieux de résidence
Annapolis, Maryland, USA
Études
Yale University (PhD | MA)
Brooklyn College (BA)
Professions
tutor
professor
intellectual historian
philosopher
Relations
Heidegger, Martin (teacher)
Klein, Jacob (colleague)
Organisations
St. John's College, Annapolis, Maryland
Prix et distinctions
National Humanities Medal (2005)
Russell Kirk Paideia Prize (2014)
Courte biographie
Eva Brann was born to a German-Jewish family in Berlin. She emigrated in 1941 to the USA and received her B.A. from Brooklyn College in 1950, her M.A. in classics from Yale University in 1951, and her Ph.D. in archaeology from Yale in 1956. She also holds an Honorary Doctorate from Middlebury College. Vermont.
She obtained a faculty position at St. John's College in Annapolis, Maryland, in 1957, and in her early years there was very close to her colleague, the philosopher Jacob Klein. After Prof. Klein's death, Prof. Brann increasingly assumed his role as the defining figure of St. John's College and the Great Books program.
She is the longest-serving member of the faculty and previously served as dean of the college.

Membres

Critiques

There is much to be commended in this short book--Brann offers helpful interpretations and reinterpretations of Heraclitean fragments, as well as correctly identifies Heraclitus' Logos as a fundamentally agonistic relation (hence "War is the Father of all things"), that both creates, maintains, and requires tension & strife. She correctly attributes features of Socrates' dialectic to core Heraclitean insights, and acknowledges that Hegel must have recognized (and utilized) the power of his ontological paradoxes.

She goes wrong when she counter-intuitively argues that Heraclitus is incorrectly read as a "flux" philosopher, and would be better paired with his contemporary Parmenides, who famously claimed that "All is one." While I wouldn't disagree that Heraclitus stands in relation (per the Logos) to Parmenides' declaration, I do not think the One of Parmenides is the same One that Heraclitus speaks of. Instead of denying the flux (change, agonism, strife) that is at the core of Heraclitus' fragments, she could have pushed Hegel's conclusions further, and found Heraclitus' true descendant in Adorno and his Negative Dialectics, which does not seek to reconcile opposites into an untrue unity.
… (plus d'informations)
 
Signalé
reganrule | 1 autre critique | Jun 3, 2016 |
Brann illuminates and injects with many meanings the surviving fragments of Heraclitus. It took awhile to get into the linguistic circumscription philosophical technique being used, but in the end it does seem warranted. Whether Heraclitus actually meant for Logos to play the role of stable opposition and unifier of ratios or it is just Brann telling that story through his fragments is secondary to the fact that this is a deep meditative reading.
 
Signalé
albertgoldfain | 1 autre critique | Oct 30, 2014 |

Prix et récompenses

Vous aimerez peut-être aussi

Auteurs associés

Statistiques

Œuvres
28
Aussi par
4
Membres
562
Popularité
#44,484
Évaluation
3.9
Critiques
2
ISBN
33
Favoris
1

Tableaux et graphiques