James David Barber (1930–2004)
Auteur de Presidents (Eyewitness Books)
A propos de l'auteur
James David Barber was a Duke University political scientist and provocateur best known for exploring the psychology of Oval Office aspirants and occupants. He spent years as a consultant to "NBC Nightly News" and as a board member of the Poynter Institute, a center for the study of journalism and afficher plus media ethics in St. Petersburg, Florida. afficher moins
Œuvres de James David Barber
The Pulse of Politics: The Rhythm of Presidential Elections in the Twentieth Century (1980) 32 exemplaires
Citizen politics; an introduction to political behavior (Markham political science series) (1972) 8 exemplaires
Political Leadership in American Government 2 exemplaires
Oeuvres associées
Étiqueté
Partage des connaissances
- Nom légal
- Barber, James David
- Date de naissance
- 1930-07-31
- Date de décès
- 2004-09-12
- Sexe
- male
- Nationalité
- USA
- Lieu de naissance
- Charleston, West Virginia, USA
- Lieu du décès
- Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Études
- Yale University (PhD)
University of Chicago (BA, MA) - Professions
- political scientist
university professor - Organisations
- Duke University
Membres
Critiques
Prix et récompenses
Vous aimerez peut-être aussi
Statistiques
- Œuvres
- 13
- Aussi par
- 1
- Membres
- 815
- Popularité
- #31,299
- Évaluation
- 3.9
- Critiques
- 6
- ISBN
- 51
Barber has a clear preference for those he feels fit in the active-positive quadrant (FDR, Truman and JFK). It's not surprising, then, that he feels the active-positives have the greatest chance of success. This flip side of this, passive-negative, are exemplified by two not often grouped together: Coolidge and Eisenhower. One wonders if forty years of historical hindsight might lead to another assessment of how Ike conducted his presidency. More tragic, though, both for the individuals as well as for the nation, are three Barber groups as active-negative: Wilson, Hoover, LBJ. The common pattern he detects in them is "a process of rigidification, a movement from political dexterity to narrow insistence on a failing course of action despite abundant evidence of the failure" (p. 18).
The heuristic value of Barber's analytic tool could be seen when he turned from analyzing the past to predicting the future, in the case of the then-sitting president, Nixon. Here, Barber's analysis led him to group Nixon with active-negatives, and to foresee the strong possibility of reacting rigidly to crisis. Barber admitted that, at the time of writing (late 1971), there was as yet no sign of it happening, but boy did events from 1972-74 bear him out.
Not the last word on presidential performance, but an eye-opener for me when it first appeared that gave me much to think about.… (plus d'informations)