Robert Augros
Auteur de The New Biology: Discovering the Wisdom of Nature
Œuvres de Robert Augros
Étiqueté
Partage des connaissances
Il n’existe pas encore de données Common Knowledge pour cet auteur. Vous pouvez aider.
Membres
Critiques
Vous aimerez peut-être aussi
Auteurs associés
Statistiques
- Œuvres
- 1
- Membres
- 34
- Popularité
- #413,653
- Critiques
- 1
- ISBN
- 4
- Langues
- 2
The following example illustrates the flaws in the reasoning supporting Augros and Stanciu's 'new paradigm.' They offer a teleological argument to explain away the ‘wasteful’ and ‘ruthless’ high-fecundity, low-care reproductive strategy found in so many species. They write, “Producing enormous numbers of offspring is not proof of ruthless competition but rather of cooperation since the excess eggs and seeds supports thousands of predators that could not otherwise subsist. If all species used the high-care, low-fecundity strategy, the vast numbers and varieties of animals we see in nature would not be possible” (p. 128). The problem with this teleological argument is that they have taken an effect of the reproductive strategy, “excess eggs and seeds supports thousands of predators”, as its cause.
In contrast, a plausible scientific explanation employs natural selection as the cause of the successful reproductive strategy. Organisms that produce very large numbers of eggs or seeds evolved from ancestors who produced fewer eggs and seeds. Within the ancestral population, there would have been variation in the number of eggs or seeds each individual organism produced. Opportunistic predators who ate the eggs or seeds acted as agents of natural selection. Those organisms who produced smaller numbers of eggs or seeds would have had most or all of them eaten, while those who produced large numbers of eggs or seeds would have substantial numbers of them survive. If the number of eggs or seeds produced is a heritable trait, then the eggs or seeds that were most likely to survive and produce the next generation would produce adult organisms that also produce large numbers of eggs and seeds. Over generations of continued selection, the number of individuals who produced large numbers of eggs and seeds would increase until they made up the largest proportion of the population.
Augros and Stanciu weave a pleasant story for those who are dismayed by the prospect of a purposeless universe, but it is not the business of science to find grand purposes in nature that give our lives meaning. We must find that meaning elsewhere. Neither can science appeal to supernatural causes as explanations. Such claims are not testable. Augros and Stanciu's teleological explanations confuse causes with effects and employ supernatural entities and thus are not scientific. Contrary to their claims, Augros and Stanciu have failed to present a new paradigm for the science of biology.… (plus d'informations)