Tamim Ansary

Okay, I read chapters 19-22 of this book, because I wanted to get as much coverage of the Soviet-Afghan War as possible. Yet what I read was far from an unbiased narrative. So far I can see that Sir Roderic Braithwaite's turn-pager is much more balanced and authoritative source on this conflict. Don't know if I should trust the rest of Mr. Ansary's creation. Let me illustrate with just one concrete example. Ansary presents mines mimicking children toys as a diabolical Soviet ploy to undermine Afghan families. Here's the coverage of the same topic by Braithwaite. Draw your own conclusions:

There were stories that both sides used booby traps and explosive devices disguised to look like everyday objects such as watches and pens. Much play was made with the story, which figured in a UN report of 1985 as well as in Western propaganda, that the KGB deliberately designed mines to look like children’s toys, in order to sow a particularly vicious kind of terror among ordinary Afghans. The Russians countered with stories that this was a tactic of the mujahedin and published photographs to back their claim. The story may have had its origin in the tiny ‘butterfly’ mines made of brightly coloured plastic, which were scattered from helicopters along rebel trails and supply routes. They were supposed to deactivate themselves after a given period, but often the deactivation mechanism did not work. But these devices were not the product of the twisted imagination of the KGB’s engineers. They were directly copied from the American Dragontooth BLU-43/B and BLU-44/B mines, used in very large numbers in Indo-China. They were intended to maim rather than to kill, since a wounded soldier is more trouble to his comrades than a dead one. The official name of the Soviet version was PFM-1, but the soldiers called them lepestki (petals). It is not surprising that children should have found them attractive, and that they and their parents should have reported them to journalists as disguised toys. But the experts in the Mine Action Coordination Centre of Afghanistan, whose job it was to know about these things, believed that the story ‘gained a life for obvious journalist reasons – but it has we think no basis in widespread fact’.24

24 - Alan A. H. Macdonald, Chief of Staff , Mine Action Coordination Centre of Afghanistan, email to author, 4 May 2009.

Afgantsy: The Russians In Afghanistan, 1979-1989 by Rodric Braithwaite, рp.234-5… (plus d'informations)

Ansary writes with a duality that matches his bicultural heritage. His words are at once graceful and blunt; elegant and funny. He calls his upbringing "straddling a crack in the earth", but what he doesn't tell you is that his ability to navigate both the American and Afghan cultures is nothing short of expert mountaineering. His siblings may have chosen a definitive side after September 11th, but Ansary decided to use his bicultural perspective in an effort to find a deeper truth. It all started with an emotional email fired off to friends and family after the fall of the World Trade Towers. The email is included at the end of West of Kabul, in case you were wondering.
The entire time Ansary was traveling around Tangier I was on edge. His experiences with the "guides" were troubling; as was the time he was duped about an upgrade to a sleeping car on a train. (By the way, I would like to see jovial and overly congenial Rick Steves navigate those kinds of harassments.) Even when Ansary traveled to city to city waiting anxiously for a letter from his girlfriend, I was on edge. Would she wait for him? You just have to read his memoir to find out.… (plus d'informations)