Cliquer sur une vignette pour aller sur Google Books.
Chargement... L'archipel du goulag. tome 2 (original 1973; édition 1974)par Soljénitsyne, Soljénitsyne (Auteur)
Information sur l'oeuvreL'Archipel du Goulag, 1918-1956 par Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn (1973)
Books Read in 2023 (3,025) Russian Literature (166) Chargement...
Inscrivez-vous à LibraryThing pour découvrir si vous aimerez ce livre Actuellement, il n'y a pas de discussions au sujet de ce livre. This review is written with a GPL 4.0 license and the rights contained therein shall supersede all TOS by any and all websites in regards to copying and sharing without proper authorization and permissions. Crossposted at WordPress, Blogspot, & Librarything by Bookstooge’s Exalted Permission Title: Gulag Archipelago, Vol 2 Series: Gulag Archipelago Author: Alexander Solzhenitsyn Rating: 4 of 5 Stars Genre: Non-fiction Pages: 648 Words: 276.5K Synopsis: Containing Parts III & IV of Solzhenitsyn’s book, The Gulag Archipelago. From Wikipedia.com Structurally, the text comprises seven sections divided (in most printed editions) into three volumes: parts 1–2, parts 3–4, and parts 5–7. At one level, the Gulag Archipelago traces the history of the system of forced labor camps that existed in the Soviet Union from 1918 to 1956. Solzhenitsyn begins with V. I. Lenin’s original decrees which were made shortly after the October Revolution; they established the legal and practical framework for a series of camps where political prisoners and ordinary criminals would be sentenced to forced labor. The book then describes and discusses the waves of purges and the assembling of show trials in the context of the development of the greater Gulag system; Solzhenitsyn gives particular attention to its purposive legal and bureaucratic development. The narrative ends in 1956 at the time of Nikita Khrushchev’s Secret Speech (“On the Personality Cult and its Consequences”). Khrushchev gave the speech at the 20th Congress of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, denouncing Stalin’s personality cult, his autocratic power, and the surveillance that pervaded the Stalin era. Although Khrushchev’s speech was not published in the Soviet Union for a long time, it was a break with the most atrocious practices of the Gulag system. Despite the efforts by Solzhenitsyn and others to confront the legacy of the Gulag, the realities of the camps remained a taboo subject until the 1980s. Solzhenitsyn was also aware that although many practices had been stopped, the basic structure of the system had survived and it could be revived and expanded by future leaders. While Khrushchev, the Communist Party, and the Soviet Union’s supporters in the West viewed the Gulag as a deviation of Stalin, Solzhenitsyn and many among the opposition tended to view it as a systemic fault of Soviet political culture – an inevitable outcome of the Bolshevik political project. Parallel to this historical and legal narrative, Solzhenitsyn follows the typical course of a zek (a slang term for an inmate), derived from the widely used abbreviation “z/k” for “zakliuchennyi” (prisoner) through the Gulag, starting with arrest, show trial, and initial internment; transport to the “archipelago”; the treatment of prisoners and their general living conditions; slave labor gangs and the technical prison camp system; camp rebellions and strikes (see Kengir uprising); the practice of internal exile following the completion of the original prison sentence; and the ultimate (but not guaranteed) release of the prisoner. Along the way, Solzhenitsyn’s examination details the trivial and commonplace events of an average prisoner’s life, as well as specific and noteworthy events during the history of the Gulag system, including revolts and uprisings. Solzhenitsyn also states: Macbeth’s self-justifications were feeble – and his conscience devoured him. Yes, even Iago was a little lamb, too. The imagination and spiritual strength of Shakespeare’s evildoers stopped short at a dozen corpses. Because they had no ideology. Ideology – that is what gives evildoing its long-sought justification and gives the evildoer the necessary steadfastness and determination. That is the social theory which helps to make his acts seem good instead of bad in his own and others’ eyes…. That was how the agents of the Inquisition fortified their wills: by invoking Christianity; the conquerors of foreign lands, by extolling the grandeur of their Motherland; the colonizers, by civilization; the Nazis, by race; and the Jacobins (early and late), by equality, brotherhood, and the happiness of future generations… Without evildoers there would have been no Archipelago. — The Gulag Archipelago, Chapter 4, p. 173 There had been works about the Soviet prison/camp system before, and its existence had been known to the Western public since the 1930s. However, never before had the general reading public been brought face to face with the horrors of the Gulag in this way. The controversy surrounding this text, in particular, was largely due to the way Solzhenitsyn definitively and painstakingly laid the theoretical, legal, and practical origins of the Gulag system at Lenin’s feet, not Stalin’s. According to Solzhenitsyn’s testimony, Stalin merely amplified a concentration camp system that was already in place. This is significant, as many Western intellectuals viewed the Soviet concentration camp system as a “Stalinist aberration” My Thoughts: Where Volume 1 seemed mainly to be about the process of how the (fictional) legalities came into being that led to arrests and about the arrests and early detainment, this volume was all about the camps and the various kinds of people in the Gulag. The first 65% dealt exclusively with the camps, what went on in them, how the prisoners existed, how they lived (and died) what uses the camps were put too. This was grueling. I started this particular volume back in August of last year and am just now finishing it up. So 5 months? I wish I had profound things to write here but I don't. Solzhenitsyn simply chronicles what has gone on and shows how some of it happened (people turning a blind eye, people letting it happen because it was happening to someone else, people letting it happen because they were afraid of it happening to them, people letting it happen because it was happening to a group they didn't like) and the absolutely horrific costs of the camps. Make no mistake, the Gulags were death camps as sure as the Nazi camps were. Solzhenitsyn also lets his own personality and biases show through quite a bit when he talks about the various kinds of people in the last part of the book. Any time a “thief” is mentioned (ie, a non-political offender for some actual crime), he really goes off against them. He makes no bones about how he survived his time (becoming an informer in the camps) and describes the very few kind of people who would refuse that (Christians being the main group). Besides the weighty content, what also slowed me down was the references to things or people that I simply had no idea about or anyway to put them into context. Many times whole passages held almost no meaning for me because I didn't know the people being talked about or the brand of Russian humor went winging its way over my head. Solzhenitsyn did have a dry, sarcastic kind of humor and I appreciated what I could understand. Whenever he talked about the language and how particular words grew out of the Gulag, he lost me there too. I won't go into the politics beyond to say that what we are seeing now in terms of our media organizations in lockstep with the current administration will be very familiar to anyone who has read this. I am going to be taking an extended break before attempting Volume 3. I've got a bunch of other non-fiction books that have been just sitting on my kindle so it's time to pay them some attention. And I can't face another volume like this for awhile, it's just too much. ★★★★☆ Truly worthwhile. A historical record and analysis and a personal story all running in parallel. Provides surprising insights into workings of governments, psychology, human motivations and of course the mind harrowing horrors of Russian 20th century history, showing how a whole society can collapse in on itself. Indeholder "Tredje del - Arbejds- og udryddelseslejrene", " 1. Auroras fingre", " 2. Arkipelaget dukker op af havet", " 3. Øhavet sætter metastaser", " 4. Øhavet stivner", " 5. Øhavets fundament", " 6. Fascisterne sættes ind", " 7. De indfødtes hverdag", " 8. Kvinden i lejren", " 9. Lejrhåndlangerne", " 10. I stedet for de politiske", " 11. De loyale", " 12. Samtaler bag den lukkede dør ...". "Tredje del - Arbejds- og udryddelseslejrene" handler om ??? " 1. Auroras fingre" handler om ??? " 2. Arkipelaget dukker op af havet" handler om ??? " 3. Øhavet sætter metastaser" handler om ??? " 4. Øhavet stivner" handler om ??? " 5. Øhavets fundament" handler om ??? " 6. Fascisterne sættes ind" handler om ??? " 7. De indfødtes hverdag" handler om ??? " 8. Kvinden i lejren" handler om ??? " 9. Lejrhåndlangerne" handler om ??? " 10. I stedet for de politiske" handler om ??? " 11. De loyale" handler om ??? " 12. Samtaler bag den lukkede dør ..." handler om ??? ??? Indeholder "Tredje del - Arbejds- og udryddelseslejrene", " 13. Man kan altid flå skindet af en mand to gang!", " 14. At ændre sin skæbne!", " 15. SJIZO, BUR, ZUR", " 16. De SOCIALT NÆRSTÅENDE", " 17. De mindreårige", " 18. Museerne i Gulag", " 19. Zek'erne som en nation", " 20. Hundetjeneste", " 21. Den nære omverden", " 22. Vi bygger", "Fjerde del - Sjæl og pigtråd", " 1. Opstigning", " 2. Eller forfald?", " 3. Den martrede frihed", " 4. Nogle levnedsløb". "Tredje del - Arbejds- og udryddelseslejrene" handler om ??? " 13. Man kan altid flå skindet af en mand to gang!" handler om ??? " 14. At ændre sin skæbne!" handler om ??? " 15. SJIZO, BUR, ZUR" handler om ??? " 16. De SOCIALT NÆRSTÅENDE" handler om ??? " 17. De mindreårige" handler om ??? " 18. Museerne i Gulag" handler om ??? " 19. Zek'erne som en nation" handler om ??? " 20. Hundetjeneste" handler om ??? " 21. Den nære omverden" handler om ??? " 22. Vi bygger" handler om ??? "Fjerde del - Sjæl og pigtråd" handler om ??? " 1. Opstigning" handler om ??? " 2. Eller forfald?" handler om ??? " 3. Den martrede frihed" handler om ??? " 4. Nogle levnedsløb" handler om ??? ??? aucune critique | ajouter une critique
Appartient à la sérieThe Gulag Archipelago (Volume 2, Parts III-IV) Appartient à la série éditorialeW&Wserien (370) Est contenu dansContientDistinctions
"BEST NONFICTION BOOK OF THE 20TH CENTURY." --Time Volume 2 of the Nobel Prize-winner's towering masterpiece: the story of Solzhenitsyn's entrance into the Soviet prison camps, where he would remain for nearly a decade. Features a new foreword by Anne Applebaum. "The greatest and most powerful single indictment of a political regime ever leveled in modern times." --George F. Kennan "It is impossible to name a book that had a greater effect on the political and moral consciousness of the late twentieth century." --David Remnick, The New Yorker "Solzhenitsyn's masterpiece. . . . The Gulag Archipelago helped create the world we live in today." --Anne Applebaum, Pulitzer Prize-winning author of Gulag: A History, from the foreword Aucune description trouvée dans une bibliothèque |
Discussion en coursAucunCouvertures populaires
Google Books — Chargement... GenresClassification décimale de Melvil (CDD)365.450947Social sciences Social problems and services; associations Penal & related institutions Institutions for specific types of inmates Political prisonersClassification de la Bibliothèque du CongrèsÉvaluationMoyenne:
Est-ce vous ?Devenez un(e) auteur LibraryThing. |
The Gulag, as a concentration camp, began shortly after the rise of Soviet Russian power. Initially for POW’s and undesirable foreigners, that quickly expanded for citizens. The Gulag was used to develop the nation. A system designed to obtain free labor. The prisoners would not earn anything, while the state profited from their labor. This was a reintroduction of slavery in Russia. The work was degrading, carried out under harsh conditions, and without appropriate tools. Under socialism, no one else but slaves would have performed the work. The prisoners were barely fed, with the little food they did receive being of a very poor quality. The guards stole a lot of food. Guards even made the prisoners compete and fight to get the food.
To get labor for the Gulag, there was a low tolerance for deviating thoughts. Anyone who was overheard to speak anything against the socialist system, no matter the significance of what was said or even the privacy of the claim, were heavily punished with major charges against them with long sentences. The Soviet system was much harsher against dissenters than previous regimes. Under the Soviet system, it was not just the dissenters who were punished, but their entire family. Even children were given the full measure of punishment, without exception if their crimes were unintentional. The children were trained to hate.
The way the authorities themselves complied with the laws, was to use a language that prevented them from thinking about the consequences of their actions. Defending oneself against this system was impossible, and going on a strike was useless. What was left was to change fate, to break out. Some tried to invent something useful for the state, which would have given them a release.
Caveats?
This book is very difficult to read. Contains poor organizational structure, as related content can be found sporadically in the book. Most of the book is composed of examples, without much systematic analysis. ( )